Showing posts with label bill kirchner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bill kirchner. Show all posts

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Bill Kirchner - Booklet Notes to "The Complete Verve Gerry Mulligan Concert Band Sessions

© Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


"It was the hottest band I ever played on."
— Bill Crow, bassist


I once made the mistake of referring to Bill Kirchner as a “Jazz writer.”


He wrote back straightaway and declared: “No I’m not; I’m a Jazz musician who writes.”


Boy, can he, as you will no doubt observe from the following excerpts from his booklet notes that accompany the Mosaic Records boxed set - The Complete Verve Gerry Mulligan Concert Band Series [MD4-221].


If you ever wanted to know why the Concert Jazz Band was so special and how it worked, the ingredients in that “secret sauce” could probably only be deciphered by a “... Jazz musician who writes.”


© Bill Kirchner/Mosaic Records ®, copyright protected; all rights reserved; used with the author’s permission. [Special thanks to Bill and Michael Cuscuna for allowing me to use this material on my blog.]


“The history of jazz is replete with memorable long-term partnerships: Bix Beiderbecke and Frank Trumbauer, Red Nichols and Miff Mole, Eddie Lang and Joe Venuti, Duke Ellington and Billy Strayhorn, Jackie Cain and Roy Krai, Eddie Sauter and Bill Finegan, Dave Brubeck and Paul Desmond, Cannonball and Nat Adderley, Ornette Coleman and Don Cherry, Thelonious Monk and Charlie Rouse, Kenny Clarke and Francy Boland, Thad Jones and Mel Lewis, Wayne Shorter and Joe Zawinul, and Pat Metheny and Lyle Mays among them. Some of these were official collaborative ventures where co-leaders shared equal billing. But at other times, there was a leader/sideman relationship that became something much more.


Such was the long-term association between baritone saxophonist Gerry Mulligan (1927—1996) and valve trombonist Bob Brookmeyer (b. 1929), which certainly ranks among jazz's most fruitful. The combination of the two was musically a natural. "They thought alike," observed jazz critic and historian Doug Ramsey. "They were both composers. But in their cases, it was the improvisation of composers who had very carefully thought out the way musical lines interrelated, and I thought their counterpoint worked beautifully."


Indeed it did — apparently, from their first encounters, which dated from 1953. At that time, Brookmeyer was a member of tenor saxophonist Stan Getz s quintet, which was playing an extended engagement in southern California. Getz and Brookmeyer discovered a startling new group: Mulligan's pianoless quartet with trumpeter Chet Baker. "We played Zardi's [with Getz] for 13 weeks, I think," recalled Brookmeyer, "and during that time we began to play after work with Chet and Gerry and Stanley and I, and they both said that it was the best band they'd ever played with and they would like to have this as a band. But then, of course, who's going to be the bandleader? Stanley already had his wings as a bandleader, and Gerry was just beginning to flex his."


Ironically, in January of 1954, Brookmeyer succeeded Baker with the Mulligan quartet. As musically superb — and commercially successful — as the pairing of Mulligan and Baker had been, this new combination proved at least as spectacular, and much longer in duration. It yielded a number of memorable recordings, initially including GERRY MULLIGAN IN PARIS (Vogue, 1954) and GERRY MULLIGAN QUARTET AT STORYVILLE (Pacific Jazz, 1956). After introducing a four-horns-bass-and-drums sextet on CALIFORNIA CONCERTS (Pacific Jazz, 1954), Mulligan made this his working ensemble for most of 1955 and '56; the frontline included Brookmeyer, tenor saxophonist Zoot Sims (1925-1985), and Jon Eardley or Don Ferrara (b. 1928) on trumpet. This too-short-lived ensemble made three sparkling albums for Mercury/EmArcy: PRESENTING THE GERRY MULLIGAN SEXTET, A PROFILE OF GERRY MULLIGAN, and MAINSTREAM OF JAZZ. The addition of two horns made the sextet a writer's showcase for Mulligan (mostly), Brookmeyer, and. in one instance (an arrangement of Claude Debussy's LA PLUS QUE LENTE), Gil Evans.


By 1957, Mulligan was a major jazz star: a poll-winning baritone saxophonist with a unique and popular group sound. But it was as a precocious composer-arranger that he had made his initial reputation. When drummer Gene Krupa's orchestra recorded Mulligan's advanced arrangement of now HOW HIGH THE MOON in 1946, Mulligan was barely 19. In the next six years. Mulligan contributed more arrangements to the band libraries of Krupa, Claude Thornhill. Elliot Lawrence, and Stan Kenton. Two of his compositions recorded by Kenton, YOUNG BLOOD and SWING HOUSE, are widely regarded as among the finest and most innovative big-band writing of the era; the former can be heard on one of Kenton's best albums, NEW CONCEPTS OF ARTISTRY IN RHYTHM (Capitol, 1952). The contrapuntal concepts (i.e.. use of simultaneous, independent lines) that Mulligan employed in these pieces — and soon afterward featured to acclaim in his small groups — made a deep impression on many jazz composer-arrangers, one of the most important ol whom was a Kenton tenor saxophonist named Bill Holman (b. 1927).


However, it was as a driving force with trumpeter Miles Davis’ 1948-50 BIRTH OF THE COOL nonet that Mulligan made his most important early contributions as a writer. Gil Evans and Mulligan had both written for Claude Thornhill. and they desired to get the sound of the Thornhill band (especially its rich French horn-and-tuba mellifluousness) with a smaller instrumentation. Thus emerged, under Davis' leadership, an ensemble that had a short existence and was a commercial failure: fortunately, it recorded a dozen pieces for Capitol that have become among the most influential in jazz history. Seven of these were composed and/or arranged by Mulligan: JERU, ROCKER, VENUS DE MILO, GODCHILD,  DARN THAT DREAM, DECEPTION and BUDO. (Note: for decades, some of these have been frequently miscredited to other arrangers. These credits came from Mulligan himself.)


Also, as an aside, a little-known fact: both Mulligan and one of his future associates, Johnny Mandel (b. 1925), stated that Mandel was in line to be a charter member of the Davis nonet — as both a player (he played trombone and bass trumpet) and writer. Alas, when the nonet began its rehearsals in 1948, Mandel was living in Los Angeles, doing a six-month residency necessary to obtain a Local 47 musicians' union card.


When Mulligan moved to California in 1951, he brought with him the concepts he had used so successfully with the Davis nonet. In January of 1953, after he had become a virtual overnight star with his pianoless quartet, he recorded eight pieces for Capitol with his own "tentetle" — a fusion of the BIRTH OF THE COOL concepts with those of the quartet. The legacy of both the nonet and tentette would far outlive their brief existences and show up later in Mulligan's Concert Jazz Band.


But there was an interim step. In April of 1957, Mulligan assembled an all-star New York City band for two days of recording for Columbia — for what was intended to be his first big-band album as a leader/composer/arranger. (Despite his identification with "West Coast jazz” Mulligan was a full-time California resident for only a handful of years.) The band was definitely an impressive one, with soloists including the leader, Brookmeyer, Zoot Sims, alto saxophonist Lee Konitz, tenor saxophonist Charlie Rouse, and trumpeters Don Ferrara, Don Joseph and Jerry Lloyd. From two days of recording, four pieces emerged: three Mulligan originals — THRUWAY, MOTEL and MULLENIUM — and his arrangement of ALL THE THINGS YOU ARE. The results (currently available on MULLENIUM, Columbia/Legacy) are distinctly Mulliganesque, highly listenable and at times brilliant, but in Mulligan's view, the light, dancing quality that he had come to value in his smaller groups was absent with the seven-brass-five-saxes-and-rhythm instrumentation. As Mulligan told Burt Korall in 1961, "The sound was too heavy and full. The flexibility I had been so happy with in the small band was missing."


In 1994, Mulligan went into further detail about this issue. "I really liked the sound of that band in '57. There were a couple of things that I wrote for that band that I got to sound more of the way I wanted a big ensemble to sound. I only ever heard a couple of other bands sound like that — or get that sound on my charts, too. What I hadn't really come to terms with was the rhythm section. In order for the rhythm section to do what I wanted them to be able to do, and why I left it as loose as I did, they would have to get to know the arrangements real well. And we never had that luxury of time. Certainly at that point I hadn't figured out how to write rhythm parts so that they flowed — how much do you indicate, how much do you write out. Nothing could be more boring than a totally written-out bass part. And if you write figures with the band, especially in the Fifties, it really takes a while for [rhythm] guys to make it sound like their own. It sounds like they're playing figures, it sounds stilted.


"So I kind of wrote myself into a blind alley with that, because it didn't ultimately jell. But 1 liked some of the stuff I wrote — there's an interesting arrangement of ALL THE THINGS YOU ARE, beautifully played. So we had our moments. But in the end, we might have gone back to it, because I had done a couple of dates, and George Avakian was producing the dates. I said, 'Well, let's put it aside for a while." and then George left Columbia and went someplace else, and it never got completed as a project."


While the Columbia dates were less than totally successful, they seem to have given Mulligan some clear ideas of what the instrumentation of his future Concert Jazz Band would be. Meanwhile, Brookmeyer left the Mulligan quartet in August of 1957 to pursue an increasingly busy freelance career in New York (as well as a memorable 1958 membership in the Jimmy Giuffre 3 with the clarinetist/saxophonist and guitarist Jim Hall). In April of 1958, Mulligan put together another outstanding quartet with trumpeter Art Farmer, Henry Grimes or later Bill Crow on bass, and drummer Dave Bailey; it lasted for a little more than a year. During this period. Mulligan also was involved as a minor actor (and sometimes as a musical performer as well) in several films: I Want to Live. The Rat Race. The Subterraneans, and Bells Are Ringing.


It’s been reported by several sources, including Leonard Feather, that the money from Mulligan’s film work was his basis for bankrolling the Concert Jazz Band. Mulligan later denied this: “I didn’t do that much. I acted in a couple of things, but it didn’t pay that much better than working [in] clubs.” But he undeniably was one of the best-paid and most successful leaders in jazz. Feather reported that “in England, where even in 1957 he was able to command $3,500 a week, every London show was a sellout, and Gerry registered more poll victories than probably any jazzman since Armstrong.” So as of 1960, when Mulligan started the Concert Jazz Band, “Whatever money I made I was sinking back into the band.” (The name of the ensemble signaled Mulligan’s intent to have, as he told Feather, “a real out-and-out jazz band,” not a dance band. As Mulligan observed, “Most bands that have been put together lately have been trying to reach a happy medium, and this doesn’t exist; they spoil the possibilities in both directions.”)


In any case, the CJB’s beginnings were less than momentous, according to Brookmeyer. “In January of 1960, Gerry called and said, could he come by my apartment; he had a week in Basin Street East [in New York] and wanted to put together a big band for it. He wanted me to write an arrangement of BWEEBIDA BOBBIDA. I don’t think that any massive decision had been made to have a [permanent] big band. That was the start, and we started rehearsing. There must have been some more jobs after that until the summer when we went to California, and that’s when we changed some personnel.


“The first six months were sometimes spent on keeping Gerry on track (laughs); I could see the potential. Gerry wanted to build out from the quartet. He wanted not a Stan Kenton or a ‘big band,’ so the quartet was the base of everything we built up from that. I was sort of the house arranger, and I was, especially the first year, the hirer and firer, and the straw boss and whatever else. Because it was the first time in my life I’d ever had a chance to be physically and musically and personally involved with something like this, where I could help something go forward.”


(Doug Ramsey confirmed Brookmeyer’s account: “I’m not ruling out Gerry’s role in this, but Brookmeyer really did do, as I understand it from Mulligan and others, a lot of the work of keeping the band level and focused. And I think he did a marvelous job of that, while writing great stuff himself and playing his behind off.”)


As one would expect, the band’s instrumentation, as determined by Mulligan and Brookmeyer, was other than conventional. There were six brass: three trumpets, Brookmeyer’s valve trombone, a slide trombone, and a bass trombone. Apart from Mulligan’s solo baritone, there were four reeds: clarinet (with some alto saxophone), alto (with occasional flute), tenor, and a section baritone doubling bass clarinet. (The clarinet lead in the reeds was not intended to be a Glenn Miller- or Ellington-style sound, but rather reflected Mulligan’s and Brookmeyer’s fondness for the way that the Claude Thornhill band--of which both men were alumni--used the instrument.) True to Mulligan’s small-group model, the rhythm section contained only bass and drums; when piano was (infrequently) used, it was played by either Mulligan or Brookmeyer. Overall, the idea was to have enough horns to provide punch and a variety of tone colors, but to have an ensemble that was lighter on its feet than a typical big band.


Mulligan intended that the bulk of the solo work would be handled by himself, Brookmeyer, tenor, and one trumpet. As he told Feather, “I’ve seen a lot of bands fall into a trap of spreading the solos around so everybody can play. Now these are known as musicians’ bands, and one of the reasons they can never establish themselves with an audience is that the audience takes time to be able to understand the playing of each man, and so many players go by that they never really have a chance to hear anybody, so nothing really sticks in their minds.” Mulligan’s attitude about this matter seems to have relaxed somewhat as the band evolved. But regardless of who was soloing, his philosophy was to allow for as much spontaneity--with open solo sections and “head” backgrounds made up on the spot--as possible.


Bill Crow (b. 1927), who along with trumpeter Clark Terry (b. 1920) joined the CJB late in 1960, talked about how this worked. “The thing that I really liked about that band was that we had a good riff-maker in each section: Clark and Bob and Gerry. We would play the written chart through whatever ensemble kicked off the next soloist, and then we didn’t count measures; we waited until Gerry gave us the signal, ’cause he liked to let the soloists stretch out. And then he would start playing the backgrounds that he liked to play with the quartet behind the soloist on his second or third chorus. And the rest of the saxophone section would chime in--harmonize what Gerry was doing. And then Brookmeyer would think of a nice counterline, and Clark would think of a nice hot little lick to stick in there. And pretty soon we had a whole new head arrangement for that section. After we’d used that up, Gerry would give us a signal, either musical or a hand signal, to go on to the next written section. It would really expand the charts and make them so interesting; we never recorded much of that.”


Mulligan and Brookmeyer put together the band with an inevitable amount of trial-and-error, making replacements when necessary. “The thing that nobody knows,” explained Brookmeyer, “is that Gerry and I really tried to make it not a ‘white band’. At early rehearsals, we had Charlie Rouse, [trumpeter] Blue Mitchell--three or four gentlemen of color were invited to be part of the band, because we did not want a white band.” (In fact, Mulligan had employed a number of black musicians during the Fifties: Rouse, guitarist Freddie Green, bassists Peck Morrison, Joe Benjamin, Henry Grimes, and Leroy Vinnegar, drummers Chico Hamilton, Dave Bailey, and Gus Johnson, and trumpeters Art Farmer and Oliver Beener. Bailey became the CJB’s first drummer, and Johnson played on its last album. And as noted, Clark Terry eventually joined and became one of the band’s spark plugs; in later years, Thad Jones and Snooky Young also were often in the trumpet section at various times.)


In addition to Brookmeyer (who wrote the largest number of the CJB’s arrangements) and Mulligan (who wrote surprisingly few), Al Cohn (1925-1988), Bill Holman, and Johnny Mandel contributed vitally to the band’s library. Mulligan went so far as to fly Holman from California to work in New York for three months. “I’d known Gerry since the early Fifties,” Holman related, “when he brought in those charts for Kenton, and we’d see each other periodically. In the late Fifties he started spending more time out in L.A., so we hung out some. He knew that I had the same kind of approach to writing -- probably a lot of it was gained from playing his music. I think he thought he could trust me. [Author’s note: Mulligan had already trusted Holman with writing arrangements for THE GERRY MULLIGAN SONGBOOK recorded in December of 1957 for Pacific Jazz.  The album featured an all-star saxophone section--Lee Konitz, Allen Eager, Zoot Sims, Al Cohn, and Mulligan--with a rhythm section of Freddie Green, Henry Grimes, and Dave
Bailey.]


“One night at one of Terry Gibbs’s gigs in ’59, Gerry asked me if I’d be able to come back to New York for a few months and help him. I jumped at it; I came in March or April of 1960. He put me on salary for a few months, and he put me up in [actress-singer] Judy Holliday’s mother’s apartment; she was living with Judy at that time, so the apartment was empty. My particular gig, I found out when I got there, was to arrange a lot of his quartet hits for big band. Brookmeyer and Cohn and all those guys were getting to write pretty much what they wanted (laughs), and I had to rewrite Gerry’s hits. Which was fine--it was good music, and within the concept of the band I
had quite a lot of freedom.”


Later on, other distinguished composer-arrangers became important contributors to the CJB book: Johnny Carisi (1922-1992), George Russell (b. 1923), and a newcomer named Gary McFarland (1933-1971). And furthermore, there were a few charts from Bill Finegan, Thad Jones, Wayne Shorter, Sy Johnson, and others.


By the time the CJB played at Basin Street East in April of 1960 (after a warm-up weekend at the Red Hill Inn near Camden, New Jersey), its personnel was, as reported by Feather: Danny Stiles, Phil Sunkel, Don Ferrara, trumpets; Bob Brookmeyer, Wayne Andre, Alan Raph, trombones; Eddie Wasserman, Dick Meldonian, Bill Holman, Gene Allen, reeds; Bill Takas, bass; Dave Bailey, drums; and Mulligan, baritone and piano. According to Feather, “Holman played only the first week at Basin Street, then withdrew to concentrate on writing, and was replaced by Zoot Sims.” (At Basin Street, the CJB shared the bill with singer Sarah Vaughan and a clarinetist named Mike Gold.)


Early in the band’s existence, Mulligan acquired a vitally important financial backer: Norman Granz, head of Verve Records and mastermind of the hugely successful Jazz At The Philharmonic tours of the postwar era. Bill Crow explained: “[Drummer] Mel Lewis told me Norman had presented this deal to Gerry that he would be Gerry’s partner. Norman could have the band for European tours and recording where he could make some money, and [in return] he would make up the difference between the losses that Gerry took booking the band into clubs over here. Evidently Gerry told each guy, ‘I need everybody to tell me what’s the absolute lowest salary that you can survive on for this band to work.’ So the guys that had families asked for a little more, the single guys took a little less, and everybody was happy about it because it was such a good band.”


The CJB continued to work in the New York area, including a May booking at the Village Vanguard, and in late May-early June, it made its first recordings. Personnel changes continued, including Gene Quill (1927-1988) for Wasserman and Jim Reider (1931-1968) for Sims. Sims, however, would return later.


In mid-June, the CJB made its first trip to California to play a one-nighter, a jazz festival at the Hollywood Bowl. At this point, Brookmeyer made an important decision. As he told it: “I was staying with Mel [Lewis], and I went with Mel to a rehearsal of Terry Gibbs’s band; the band was fantastic. And I thought, ‘Jesus, we sound like fucking amateurs--this is a band!’ So I don’t recall whether I even asked Gerry or not, but I hired Mel and [bassist] Buddy Clark and [trumpeter] Conte [Candoli]. Then we made some other changes when we came back. But getting Mel, of course, was the key.”


And it was. Without slighting the ability of Dave Bailey (b. 1926), a most capable small-group drummer and a Mulligan stalwart, the addition of Lewis (1929-1990), one of the finest big-band drummers of all time, proved a crucial step forward. Lewis continued to live in California until 1963, but he commuted regularly between Los Angeles and New York for Mulligan and other work--a rather extraordinary display of commitment.


Back on the East Coast, the CJB made a Newport Jazz Festival appearance on July 1. Of that occasion, Gene Lees wrote a vivid account: “It was pouring rain that night. I was back in the band tent when they went on. Voice Of America was videotaping the show. I slipped into the control room, which was at the front of the stage. The stage was at chest height, and, under the roof of that improvised control booth, I had the perfect vantage point. I could see not only what was happening on stage but the TV monitors showing what the cameramen were picking up. The band began to play Bob Brookmeyer’s chart on Django Reinhardt’s MANOIR DE MES REVES an exquisite thing. I watched a monitor as a camera panned across a sea of black umbrellas in the rain and then picked up a great puddle onstage in which was reflected the image of Gerry Mulligan, upside down, as he started his solo. The raindrops fell into this puddle, making the image tremble, like the music. The memory is indelible.”


At the end of July, the CJB returned to Plaza Sound in New York; after more key personnel changes (including Zoot Sims returning on tenor), the band redid and completed its first album.


Lead trumpeter Danny Stiles was replaced by Nick Travis (1925-1964). Along with Brookmeyer and Lewis, Travis became one of the CJB’s pivotal members. As Mulligan attested, “I had a lot of pressure (laughs) from Nick Travis and Brookmeyer and Mel Lewis to put that band together. They were always on my case. It never would have become a band without their collaboration,pushing me to do it.”


Norman Granz hastened the release of the first album, THE CONCERT JAZZ BAND to coincide with the CJB’s fall tours. Typical of the critical response was John S. Wilson’s October 30 review in the New York Times: “On the basis of its first disk, THE CONCERT JAZZ BAND ...is the most promising big band organized in the last fifteen years.”


In mid-September, the CJB flew to California and beginning with the Monterey Jazz Festival, executed by bus and plane a West Coast and, then, cross-country tour of the United States. (This included five nights in the Sutherland Lounge in Chicago, October 19-23.) After the album had been made, there were three other personnel changes: Dick Meldonian, who had recently become a father and didn’t want to go on the road, was replaced by Bob Donovan; Wayne Andre left to become a CBS staff musician and was succeeded by Willie Dennis; and Jim Reider returned as section tenor, allowing Zoot Sims, who didn’t want to play in the section, to travel that fall with the CJB as “guest soloist”.


“By that time we’d really solidified,” Brookmeyer recalled. “Two weeks in the [Village] Vanguard [author’s note: actually four--two in July and two in September] had given us a good spirit, and we really felt that we were a good band. I remember the first night at the Vanguard with Mel, I just looked across and thought, ‘My God, this feels so good!’


“[On tour] we rode in a bus. Nick Travis and Mel and I were sort of the cadre--I was first and Mel was second and Nick was in there somewhere. So we sort of ran the band away from the stand - probably on the stand a little bit, too. The bus was a zoo--screaming and yelling, everybody got nicknames, a lot of drinking. Mulligan was flying back to New York after every concert to be with Judy [Holliday]. [Author’s note: in the late Fifties and early Sixties, Mulligan was involved in a serious relationship with Holliday. The actress at that time was ill with the early stages of the cancer that would kill her in 1965.] He made one trip with us, and couldn’t believe it. He said, ‘I’ll never do that again--you guys are crazy!’


“And we were! In Europe I called us ‘the basketball team,’ careening around. But there was a lot of esprit in the band, and we really enjoyed playing, and we were, I think, proud of the band, too.”


Upon completing its sweep of the U.S., the CJB flew off to western Europe for a three-week concert tour of major cities, including Amsterdam, Berlin, Copenhagen, Genoa, Gothenburg, Milan, Paris, Stockholm, and Zurich. A few items from the Berlin and Milan concerts--as well as from an October 1 appearance in Santa Monica, California--were later released on the CJB’s
ON TOUR album. Recordings of its Paris and Zurich concerts--alas, not owned by Verve-- were released on CD in the 1990s. Mulligan also mentioned in 1994 that a tape of the Gothenburg concert was mislaid and found years later by Granz. (It’s now owned by Fantasy.) By all accounts, the European sojourn was highly successful in every respect; unfortunately, it was the CJB’s only trip overseas.


Back in New York, the CJB began a two-week engagement at the Village Vanguard on November 29--“all three previous stints [at the Vanguard] having been standing room only smashes,” according to a press release. Buddy Clark and Conte Candoli had returned to California after the tour, replaced by Bill Crow and Clark Terry, and Zoot Sims departed for good. The hiring of Terry, who was recommended by Nick Travis, evidently compensated for the loss of Sims. “Clark just really turned the whole band on,” declared Crow. “The right addition to that band--he had such a big bag of really extraordinary things that he could do on a big band.”


Crow and Lewis quickly became an exemplary rhythm team that functioned for most of the remainder of the CJB’s existence.  “Mel was interesting,” said Crow. “When I first heard him, I was at the Hickory House with [drummer] Joe Morello and [pianist] Marian [McPartland].  Guys would come in to sit in, including Mel, and he didn’t sound like anything special to me. I was so used to Joe’s control when he played with the trio, and I felt that Mel was playing a little heavy for that, but he seemed like a good player.


“Then he went to California, and my suspicion is that he fell under the influence of [drummer] Shelly Manne, because the next time I heard him play, he was doing all those subtle, interesting things that I had heard Shelly do, and I had never heard Mel play like that before. I had heard him with Kenton, but not the way he had it down a year or so later. All of a sudden he had control of his cymbal sound, and he wasn’t cutting the brass section as much as he was setting them up. And he would switch over to that kind of a dead sizzle cymbal he found that had a crack in it--it had such a wonderful sound behind the sax section.


“Mel’s tendency was always to settle. I never heard him rush in my life; if he ever made a mistake, it was to slow down. So I used to just play on the front end of that beat, and it seemed to really match what he was doing, and I could feel like I was putting some life into it. I just loved playing with him. I could trust where he was going to be, and really enjoyed the decoration that he brought. He told me one time, ‘I don’t believe in kicking the brass section anymore; those guys get lazy and they lay behind the beat, and if you don’t kick ’em, they have to get up on time and swing themselves. And they’ve got enough accents in the sound of the brass that the drummer doesn’t have to be adding to that.’ He said, ‘I’d rather play the saxophone parts, and then set the brass section up.’ He was just brilliant in figuring out how to get a good beat going that would excite the band, and not ever feel like he was pushing.”


The vibrancy of the Crow/Lewis team can be heard on the CJB’s AT THE VILLAGE VANGUARDat , recorded on a single Sunday afternoon. (Material recorded at other times during the two-week run has not been locatable in the current Verve vaults.) The band as a whole sounds relaxed and thoroughly seasoned by this time, with countless possibilities ahead.


But because of an unexpected development, only some of those possibilities were ever realized. In January of 1961, Norman Granz sold Verve to MGM for $2.5 million. The financial support that had enabled the CJB to exist as a full-time working band abruptly disappeared, and Mulligan was unable to carry the band on salary on his own. So Mulligan reverted to his quartet (now with Brookmeyer, Crow, and Lewis, Gus Johnson, or Dave Bailey) as his principal working group, and the CJB became a part-time band that worked mainly in the New York City area. As Crow noted in his book From Birdland To Broadway, “...the spirit wasn’t the same. We weren’t the family we had been; we had lost the continuity and the feeling of commitment. Gigs with the Concert Jazz Band were still fun, but the band wasn’t the center of our lives anymore.”


All was not lost, however. The CJB still had two remarkable albums ahead: A CONCERT IN JAZZ and GERRY MULLIGAN ‘63. (In addition, in April of 1961, an augmented edition of the band recorded a vocal album supporting Judy Holliday; it was released by DRG as HOLLIDAY WITH MULLIGAN in 1980.) And it still played in public with a frequency that most part-time big bands today would envy. Crow’s gig diary for 1964, for example, notes the following CJB bookings: four weeks in Birdland for January, another four weeks in Birdland during March and April, a Carnegie Hall concert in November, and finally, three weeks in Birdland in December. At that point, with the closing of Birdland, the band simply ceased working, though it never seems to have come to an official end.


In a glowing Down Beat review of two January ’64 nights by the CJB in Birdland, Ira Gitler wrote: “...if this band cannot work when it wants to, there is something very wrong with the state of music in the United States.” (The band on those two nights included a trumpet section of Travis, Terry,
and Thad Jones, as well as Richie Kamuca and Al Cohn alternating on tenor, and Phil Woods subbing for Quill.) But possibly the CJB had simply run its course. In a 1970 Down Beat interview, Mel Lewis revealed that “Gerry’s always had a stopping point. I guess we were actually starting to take over and he’d feel that. He didn’t resent it, but he couldn’t let it go beyond a certain point.” Thad Jones added, “It’d be going like a sonofabitch, and all of a sudden it would hit a brick wall. Not a brick wall, but a velvet wall.” For that matter, Brookmeyer also has spoken of having wanted to take the CJB musically further out than Mulligan was comfortable in going.


So in a very real sense, the Thad Jones-Mel Lewis orchestra, which began late in 1965, picked up where the CJB left off.  Not coincidentally, one of its key charter members, as both a player and composer-arranger, was Brookmeyer. (Also, between 1961 and ‘67, the trombonist co-led a unique quintet with Clark Terry--a fellow Sagittarian.)


Mulligan continued to have a distinguished career for another three decades, though in retrospect, the decade following the demise of the CJB seems to have been rather anti-climactic for him, compared with his monumental accomplishments of the preceding two decades. (Perhaps the title of a 1965 Mulligan album of pop/rock tunes tells part of the story: IF YOU CAN’T BEAT ‘EM JOIN ‘EM.) In the late 1970s, he put together a slightly larger, more
conventional big band that worked off and on for several years, and in the Eighties and Nineties, he toured actively with his quartet, now using a piano-bass-and-drums rhythm section. (In 1992, Mulligan even re-recorded the Miles Davis BIRTH OF THE COOL material with a nonet.) By the time of his death, Mulligan had become a jazz elder statesman.


Not long before Mulligan died of cancer on January 19, 1996, he, Phil Woods, and others performed on an ocean-liner jazz cruise. “On that last gig,” Woods reported, “Gerry played so deeply and honestly with his quartet that all of us (Johnny Mandel, Gene Lees, and [Woods’s wife] Jill and I) cried like babies. It was some of the most beautiful music I ever heard in my life.”


Brookmeyer, too, has become a jazz elder statesman. After leaving the Jones-Lewis orchestra in 1968, he moved to Los Angeles and spent the next decade in artistic limbo. But in 1978, he returned to the East Coast and resumed an active career in jazz. His playing, always personal, has become even richer and more venturesome, and his compositions for large ensembles now comprise one of the most impressive bodies of writing in jazz history.


For a few years in the early 1960s, the Concert Jazz Band was the center of Mulligan’s and Brookmeyer’s artistic lives. Bill Crow insightfully summed up the relationship between the two men. “Bobby had a musical integrity that was so powerful that he became the sounding board for the band, like ‘Are we playing well?’ Not Gerry. And it was an interesting combination, because Gerry was taking care of the star appeal and the direction of the band in terms of presenting it to the public, and it was certainly Gerry’s musicality that was shaping the band. But if we wanted to know whether we were really where we belonged to be as a unit, we always had our feelers out to Bobby. And I think as a result of that, Gerry had a stronger musical core than he knew.


“Bob had his own musicianship and musicality that were so strong and radiated such a no-nonsense, ‘let’s get right into the core of this,’ that you couldn’t be superficial on that band. Even the drunks and the weirdos (laughs) would get sucked into that thing, and it was so strong. I don’t think Gerry would have been able to create that kind of a thing by himself, because he had too much ego. Bobby didn’t have any ego, except musically. Bob had a great sense of humor, and it made it impossible for Gerry to get into his ego thing; it pulled him back into his music thing where he was strongest, and I think without Bobby, that it might not have gone exactly that way.


“So I really valued him as the straw boss on that band. He brought a demand for musical integrity that everybody followed, and it really brought the best out of that band. He could do it in a way that Gerry never felt threatened -- Gerry just felt the support of having him.”


Thus happened one of the most impressive jazz orchestras of the postwar era.  But let’s allow Brookmeyer the last word: “One of my classic stories happened in Berlin.  Nick and Mel and I were having a beer out on the terrace. Zoot and Quill roomed together--my God, imagine that!-- and they come out.  “Where are you going?” We’re going to the laundry.” So we’re still there about two hours later, and they come mopin’; back. “What happened?”


“They turned us down.”"



Saturday, December 29, 2018

A Conversation About Jazz With Bill Kirchner

© -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


Over the years, I learned a great deal about Jazz from Bill Kirchner. Not first-hand, mind you, as I live on the Left Coast and he lives on the other one. So we can’t just get together for an espresso or a brewski or a glass of vino while Bill expounds on his unique understanding of Jazz.

No, I’ve had to learn from Bill vicariously - through listening to his recordings, reading his many writings about the music, and via the occasional correspondences we’ve exchanged over the years. The latter are mostly to do with requests for copyright permissions which Bill, being the heckuva nice guy that he is, always grants.

Phone calls and video conferencing would be good, but he’s a busy guy and I’m more than a bit aurally challenged these days so that approach has its limitations.

What to do; what to do?

And then I came across the following from - “Writing About People: The Interview” in William Zinnsser’s On Writing Well:

“Get people talking. Learn to ask questions that will elicit answers about what is most interesting or vivid in their lives. Nothing so animates writing as someone telling what he thinks or what he does — in his own words.

His own words will always be better than your words, even if you are the most elegant stylist in the land. They carry the inflection of his speaking voice and the idiosyncrasies of how he puts a sentence together. They contain the regionalisms of his conversation and the lingo of his trade. They convey his enthusiasms. This is a person talking to the reader directly, not through the filter of a writer. As soon as a writer steps in, everyone else's experience becomes secondhand.

Therefore, learn how to conduct an interview.”

And, to take it a step further, how about conducting an interview that essentially conducts itself by creating a series of questions that attach to an email, contacting Bill and asking if he would be willing to write responses?

No pressure. No time constraints. No impediments.

Bill takes his time and constructs thoughtful and instructive responses that make my pedestrian questions sound better than they are and - Viola! - I’m learning more about Jazz from Bill Kirchner.

So that’s what I did and the following is what he shared in return - all 13 pages of it!

Did I mention that Bill is a heckuva nice guy?

© -Steven Cerra and Bill Kirchner, copyright protected; all rights reserved.

A Conversation About Jazz with Bill Kirchner

How and when did music first come into your life?  
Probably around the age of five—which would have been 1958.  There were a number of TV cop shows that featured modern jazz scores, beginning with Peter Gunn.  Most of them only lasted a season or two:  Mr. Lucky, Johnny Staccato, Richard Diamond, Dan Raven, Checkmate, etc.  But all of them had scores by Henry Mancini, Pete Rugolo, John Williams, and others.  They used sounds that intrigued me; I later discovered that these sounds were called “harmonies.”

What are your earliest recollections of Jazz?  
Again, probably the Peter Gunn series, which was popular beginning in the fall of 1958.  It had an innovative jazz score by Henry Mancini that was very influential, and they even showed real jazz musicians like Victor Feldman and Shorty Rogers on camera.  (You can see many of these episodes today on YouTube.)

By the way, Peter Gunn also was my introduction to the concept of sex. Even at the tender age of five, I understood that Lola Albright, who played Peter Gunn’s singer-girlfriend, was stunning. She died only this year at age 92.

What made you decide to become a Jazz musician?  
On June 19, 1965, I attended the Pittsburgh Jazz Festival with my parents.  The festival was produced by George Wein and lasted for three days; we went on a Saturday night.  The lineup that evening included the Walt Harper Quintet, a local group; Earl Hines with a trio; Carmen McRae with the Norman Simmons Trio; the Stan Getz Quartet with Gary Burton, Steve Swallow, and probably Roy Haynes; the John Coltrane Quartet with McCoy Tyner, Jimmy Garrison, and Elvin Jones; and the Duke Ellington Orchestra.

I had never heard Coltrane before, and he left my parents and me baffled; this was nine days before he recorded Ascension.  But we hung in for Duke’s band at the end.  Overall, this was a mind-boggling experience for a kid who was just short of twelve years old.  From then on, I somehow knew that this was what I wanted to do.

Many conversations about Jazz invariably turn to “impressions” and “favorites.” Why do you think this is the case?
I’m not quite sure what you mean.  In my case, I’m a devout eclectic, so I’ve been affected musically by many, many people.  To narrow these to a handful would be impossible and pointless.

Okay, so let’s turn to “impressions”; who were the Jazz musicians who first impressed you and why?
All of the aforementioned.  Most of all Duke Ellington, whose band I first heard on The Ed Sullivan Show when I was ten. The sound of that saxophone section playing “Satin Doll” with those voicings lingered in my head for weeks thereafter.

Staying with your impressions for a while, what comes to mind when I mention the following Jazz musicians:

Louis Armstrong
The father of “vernacular music,” which was made possible by the microphone.  Anyone with any kind of contemporary rhythmic concept—be they singer, instrumentalist, or composer-arranger—owes a debt to Armstrong.  By the way, my favorite Armstrong performance, both playing and singing, is his 1957 recording of “You Go To My Head” with Oscar Peterson. If you want to understand where Miles Davis came from, and why Armstrong is still relevant today, listen to this.  I often play it for students, and many of them find it a life-changing record.

Duke Ellington
The most important and innovative name in jazz composing and arranging. Though I’m puzzled by people who put him in competition with composers such as Stravinsky, Bartók, and Copland. Ellington was a unique voice, and he could do things that those others could not do, but they could likewise do things that he could not do.  So what’s the point of such comparisons?  Music is not the National Football League.  More to the point, I’m one of a zillion jazz composer-arrangers who have been deeply affected by his work (and Billy Strayhorn’s).

Coleman Hawkins
The father of jazz tenor saxophone, and along with Art Tatum, the first major jazz soloist for whom harmony was the primary consideration.  There would not have been a Don Byas, Charlie Parker, Sonny Rollins, John Coltrane, and many others as we know them without Hawkins.  Though all of those players had other influences as well—most notably Tatum and/or Lester Young.

Lester Young
The father of modern linear thinking in jazz.  Including an even-eighth-note concept that he probably got from Bix Beiderbecke and Frank Trumbauer and that was expanded upon by Charlie Christian and Charlie Parker, as well as over-the-bar phrasing that Christian and Parker likewise embraced. There probably has never been a more emotionally naked jazz soloist than Lester; his fondness for singers, especially Frank Sinatra and Billie Holiday, reflects this. Too bad that Sinatra and Lester never did an album together. (Or for that matter, Sinatra and Miles Davis.)

Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker
The yin and yang of bebop.  Or as Dizzy called Bird, “the other half of my heartbeat.”  Bird was bebop’s most inspired and inspiring voice, and Dizzy was its master theoretician, teacher, and organizer; he had a self-discipline that Bird lacked.  I think that both Dizzy and Miles reached their peaks as players in their early 40s: circa 1957-62 and circa 1966-71, respectively.  Bird of course died young because of his excesses, so it’s impossible to know how or even if he would have developed further.

Stan Getz
A master player who has been more of an influence than he’s often been credited.  As Coltrane said, “We’d all sound like that if we could.”
My favorite Getz album is Sweet Rain from 1967, with Chick Corea, Ron Carter, and Grady Tate—Getz at his most challenged and inspired.  Though Focus, with Eddie Sauter’s masterly string writing, is a close second.

Lest I forget, Getz the sophisticated lyricist was also capable of the straight-ahead, stomping virtuosity of the 1955 “S-H-I-N-E.”  As with Sweet Rain and Focus, this too is one of his most acknowledged recorded masterpieces.  Getz’s virtuosity was a multifaceted one.

John Coltrane
As I said, I first heard Coltrane when I was very young, but it took me many years to fully appreciate him. One of the most underappreciated things about him was his encyclopedic knowledge of the American Popular Song.  As a result, he and Red Garland could walk into those 1957-58 Prestige record dates unprepared and effortlessly record many obscure tunes. No matter how “out” his music got later on, Coltrane retained a basic, grounding lyricism that was missing in many of his less-capable imitators.  Not to mention his deep harmonic knowledge and astounding technical virtuosity.

Miles Davis-Gil Evans collaborations
One of the greatest partnerships in twentieth-century music—matched only by Ellington/Strayhorn and Sinatra/Nelson Riddle.  Miles was Gil’s greatest interpreter, and Gil could frame and inspire Miles as no one else could.  (When Miles died, he and Johnny Mandel were discussing doing an orchestral project.  Given the success of Mandel’s Here’s To Life album with Shirley Horn—which Miles was scheduled to have played on—one can only lament that Miles and Mandel never got together.)

Gil was a master colorist, and part of the thrill of looking at his autograph scores is seeing some of the unconventional sonorities he came up with. (One chart for Porgy and Bess had three bass clarinets in both unison and harmony; they sounded like a grainy cello section.) But he was more than just a colorist. Compare his 1956 five-horn chart on Blues for Pablo for Hal McKusick with the much larger version of Blues for Pablo on the Miles Ahead album a year later.  There’s a structural and harmonic strength in both versions that makes the size of the bands irrelevant.

Miles Ahead, Porgy and Bess, and Sketches of Spain all belong in any serious jazz record collection; even the lesser Quiet Nights, a relative failure, has its charms.  Gil continued to do uncredited work on Miles’ small-group albums for another two decades.  Given the value of the Miles and Gil projects and Gil’s best albums as a leader and for others, Evans deserves his reputation as jazz’s finest orchestrator after Ellington and Strayhorn. That reputation is undiminished today despite his relatively small output.  

Gerry Mulligan, Bob Brookmeyer, and the Concert Jazz Band
Mulligan’s 13-piece CJB began in 1960, went full-steam for a little over a year, then lasted part-time until petering out at the end of 1964. Brookmeyer was its “hirer and firer,” chief arranger, and (along with Mulligan) principal soloist.  Other contributors to its book were Al Cohn, Bill Holman, the young newcomer Gary McFarland, Johnny Carisi, George Russell, and (only occasionally) Mulligan.

The CJB was a successful attempt at preserving the airiness of Mulligan’s small groups while maintaining the punch and colors of a big band.  Brookmeyer, Mel Lewis, and Thad Jones—all CJB sidemen—eventually got impatient with Mulligan’s musical conservatism; Jones called it a “velvet wall.”  In the later Thad Jones-Mel Lewis band, they sought to expand the possibilities of the big band/small band dichotomy.

On Mulligan’s own terms, though, the CJB was a remarkable ensemble unlike any other.  In a sense, it was an expansion of the Red Norvo and Claude Thornhill bands of the Swing Era.  All three bands excelled in a kind of quiet ecstasy built around relatively subdued instruments: the xylophone (Norvo), French horns and clarinets (Thornhill), and a single clarinet lead and Mulligan’s light baritone (CJB).

The pleasures of the CJB’s music are real and considerable, but as with Mulligan’s “pianoless” small groups, I find that I need to wear a different set of ears for it.  This music is the antithesis of the simple, roaring bluesiness of Count Basie or the raw physicality of Maynard Ferguson and Buddy Rich.  Sometimes that’s just fine, sometimes not.  “Velvet wall” indeed!

Kenny Clarke-Francy Boland Big Band
This is a band that has grown on me over the past 45 years.  It existed in Europe in the 1960s and was half top European players and half American expatriates.  It was co-led by the pioneer bebop drummer Kenny Clarke and the Belgian pianist-composer-arranger Francy Boland.  Boland was the band’s principal writer.

The Clarke-Boland band in its heyday was often compared with the Thad Jones-Mel Lewis band, but I don’t believe that the comparison holds up too well.  Both bands were brimming with jazz virtuosi, but I generally don’t find Boland’s writing nearly as satisfying as Jones’s (and Bob Brookmeyer’s).  Boland’s writing was always competent, but it seldom had the point of view or personality that Jones’s and Brookmeyer’s had.  With Thad and Bob, one often got the sense of writers trying to do new things within older traditions.  I seldom get that from Boland.  (A notable exception: the CBBB’s 1971 album Change of Scenes with Stan Getz as guest soloist.  I facetiously call this recording “Francy Boland on acid.”)

Another crucial difference:  the Jones-Lewis band had Thad out front as soloist-conductor, whereas with the CBBB, both co-leaders remained in the rhythm section.  Jones was an inspiring conductor and a natural-assed bandleader, whereas both Clarke and Boland were seemingly reserved men devoid of any showmanship.  Despite the CBBB’s collective excellence, there was no one overtly in charge.  Interestingly, the band in 1967 permanently added Kenny Clare as a second drummer.  It was never clear why this was done, though one wonders if the added visual dimension had something to do with it.

Here’s my favorite video of the CBBB:  a 1970 concert with Dizzy Gillespie as guest soloist:  https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dizzy+gillespie+clarke-boland
With Dizzy out front, the band instantly had a dimension it usually lacked:  a soloist-frontman who was one of jazz’s foremost showmen.  It’s great fun to watch the band respond to Dizzy, and vice versa.

Thad Jones–Mel Lewis Orchestra
The most important large jazz band of the past half-century.  More than anyone else, Thad Jones gave conventional big-band writing (i.e., 8 brass, 5 saxophones-with-doubles, rhythm) a new lease on life.  And he and Mel changed listeners’ expectations of a big band. With Jones-Lewis, the band could shift effortlessly from complex ensembles to the looseness and hipness of the best small groups.  Big bands and composer-arrangers all over the world took notice.

I first heard Bob Brookmeyer’s “ABC Blues” (from the first Jones-Lewis album) when I was 13 years old.  Though I had already heard Ellington, Basie, Harry James, Buddy Rich, and Glenn Miller, I had never heard a big band like this, and it hit me hard.  I devoured all of the available Jones-Lewis albums when I was in high school, and when I went to New York to attend college, Monday nights at the Village Vanguard became a major part of my musical education.  Watching Thad conducting that band was an experience I’ll never forget.  Later, I got to know both Thad and Mel, and still later I subbed in the saxophone section of Mel’s band (after Thad’s departure in 1979) in the 1980s.

Given all this, I’ve been dismayed in recent years that several jazz-history texts have paid little or no attention to the Jones-Lewis band and its successors, the Mel Lewis Jazz Orchestra and (since Mel’s death in 1990) the Vanguard Jazz Orchestra.  This to me is inexcusable.  So I’m gratified to see the newly-published book 50 Years at the Village Vanguard: Thad Jones, Mel Lewis and the Vanguard Jazz Orchestra.  I hope that this book will shine a needed light on one of the seminal ensembles in jazz history.  

What brought about your interest in Jazz composition – arranging - orchestrating? How did you go about acquiring these skills?  Who were/are some of your greatest influences in these areas?
As I’ve said, from the age of five I heard sounds that captivated my ears—sounds that I later learned were polychords and contemporary harmonies.  Jazz and contemporary classical music had more of those sounds than did any other musics—certainly more than rock, country, and folk musics.  So my tastes as a listener were set, and when I was in high school, I was lucky to have a hip band director named Sam D’Angelo.  We had a “stage band,” as they were then called euphemistically, and for that band I wrote my first charts and played my first jazz solos.

As a composer-arranger, I’ve been most influenced by writers such as Duke Ellington, Billy Strayhorn, Eddie Sauter, Gil Evans, Gerry Mulligan, Thad Jones, Bob Brookmeyer, Bill Holman, Gary McFarland, Clare Fischer, Wayne Shorter, Herbie Hancock, Rod Levitt, Mike Abene, Mike Gibbs, and others.  When I lived in Washington, D.C. from 1975 to 1980, I was extremely fortunate to work for several years with a big band led by Mike Crotty, who at the time was staff arranger for the USAF Airmen of Note.  Crotty was and is an undersung heavyweight; I tell people that I went to the University of Mike Crotty.  Later, I got a National Endowment jazz grant and studied with Rayburn Wright, who was head of the Jazz and Film-Scoring Department at the Eastman School of Music.  So with Crotty, Wright, and later Brookmeyer and Manny Albam at the BMI Jazz Composers Workshop in New York, I had four of the best jazz composing-arranging teachers on the planet.

When I moved back to New York in 1980, I knew that however I was going to make a living as a musician, I needed my own band to write for.  That led to forming my Nonet, which I had for 21 years.  There’s nothing like having some of the world’s best jazz musicians to write for to kick your derrière.  We eventually did five albums:  What It Is To Be Frank and Infant Eyes (both LPs for Sea Breeze), and Trance Dance (a two-CD set for A-Records), One Starry Night, and Lifeline (both CDs for Jazzheads).

I try to pass along what I’ve learned.  I’ve taught advanced jazz composing-arranging (and numerous other courses) at The New School for Jazz and Contemporary Music in New York for 26 years, and a “Music of Duke Ellington” course at Manhattan School of Music for 14 years.

One of my proudest achievements as a record producer was a 5-CD set for the Smithsonian Collection of Recordings, Big Band Renaissance: The Evolution of the Jazz Orchestra.  It’s a collection of post-Swing Era big band recordings from 1941 to 1991.  Smithsonian Recordings went out of business almost twenty years ago, but you can still find copies of the boxed set online.

When you form a rhythm section, what do you look for in a pianist; a bassist; a drummer. If you could substitute a guitarist for a pianist in this rhythm section would you be inclined to do so? Or would you prefer to have both and if so why and if not why?
In all cases, I look for players who know how to LISTEN—to each other and to the rest of the ensemble.  And hook up rhythmically.  Also, their reading skills need to be at least adequate, though I’ll take a superior listener with a hip time feel over a great reader any day.

I don’t know any guitarist who can play the harmonies generated by my favorite pianists.  So there would be few instances where I would prefer guitar to piano in a rhythm section.  Having both piano and guitar tends to be too cluttered unless the roles of each are carefully defined.  If you have a guitarist who reads single lines fluently (Barry Galbraith was legendary for that), having guitar doubling lines with sections in a big band is a great color.

What instruments make up your current Nonet and why did you decide on this format for your regular working group?
  1. 2) Two trumpets (with mutes) doubling flugelhorns
  1. Bass trombone (with mutes)
  2. Reed I:  soprano and alto saxophones, flute, alto flute, clarinet, piccolo
  3. Reed II:  tenor saxophone, flute, alto flute, clarinet
  4. Reed III:  baritone saxophone (or bassoon), bass clarinet, flute
  5. Piano and synthesizer
  6. Acoustic and electric basses
  7. Drums

Having two trumpets and a bass trombone, with three reeds as inner        voices, allows for a quasi-big-band sound when desired. Having the bass trombone on the bottom is a hipper, fatter sound than baritone saxophone.  Also, extensive woodwind doubling and muted brass give a huge variety of coloristic possibilities.

Switching to the subject of “favorites:”
What are some of your favorite books about Jazz?
Just a few, in no particular order:
Martin Williams, The Jazz Tradition
Max Harrison, A Jazz Retrospect
Larry Kart, Jazz In Search of Itself
Walter van de Leur, Something To Live For: The Music of Billy Strayhorn
Keith Waters, The Studio Recordings of the Miles Davis Quintet, 1965-68
Rayburn Wright, Inside the Score
Dan Morgenstern, Living with Jazz
Richard M. Sudhalter, Lost Chords
Terry Teachout, Duke: A Life of Duke Ellington
Ted Gioia, West Coast Jazz
Gene Lees, Meet Me at Jim & Andy’s

What are some of your favorite Jazz recordings?
Again, just a few, in no particular order:
Duke Ellington, The Far East Suite
Miles Davis, Miles Ahead
Miles Davis, Miles Smiles
Wayne Shorter, Speak No Evil
Herbie Hancock, The Prisoner
Bill Evans, Sunday at the Village Vanguard
Thad Jones-Mel Lewis, Monday Night
Denny Zeitlin, Zeitgeist
Kenny Wheeler, Gnu High
Sarah Vaughan, Sassy Swings Again
Lester Young Trio
Shirley Horn, Here’s to Life
Joe Henderson in Japan
Steve Kuhn-Gary McFarland, The October Suite
Sonny Rollins, Our Man in Jazz
Louis Armstrong Meets Oscar Peterson
The Lee Konitz Duets

Who are your favorite big band arrangers?
I think that I’ve already answered that, more or less.

Who are your favorite Jazz vocalists?
Among the deceased, Sarah Vaughan and Shirley Horn top my list.  I won’t mention anyone living for fear of making enemies among those I omit. One living exception, though, is a singer-pianist who I’m sure no one will begrudge me:  Andy Bey.  

Who among current Jazz musicians do you enjoy listening to?
All of my former and current students who have done well.  By dumb luck, I’ve managed since 1991 to have had many of the best jazz musicians under current age 46 as students.  I’ve had well over 1000 (mostly classroom) students at this point.

How did you become involved in Jazz education?  
In 1979, arranger Bill Potts got me my first college-teaching gig at Montgomery Community College in Maryland.  And I started doing clinics elsewhere. In 1991, I was hired to teach at The New School, and the rest has mushroomed from there.  

What classes have you taught and/or are you currently teaching and where?
At the risk of appearing overly academic, here’s from my resumé:

The New School for Jazz and Contemporary Music

Adjunct Faculty 1991-present (all undergraduate students).  Classes include:
Advanced Composing/Arranging (1991-present)
Jazz History (1996-present)
Jazz & Ballet (2000-01)
Composers Forum (2001-02)
Composition Styles (2002-05)
Improvisation Ensembles (2006-07, 2014-present)
Contemporary Jazz & Its Exponents (2010, 2013-14)  
Music of Bill Evans (2013)
Manhattan School of Music
Adjunct Faculty 2004-present (undergraduate and graduate students).
Music of Duke Ellington (2004-present), Music of Miles Davis (2016-present)

New Jersey City University

Adjunct Faculty 2002-2015
Jazz History (Master’s Program); Composition Styles (Master’s Program)
Rutgers University/Newark
Guest Lecturer of Graduate Seminars, 2002-03, 2006: Jazz-Research Master’s Program

I’ve also done clinics, school concerts, and artist-in-residences all over the world.

What brought about your selection as the editor of the Oxford Companion to Jazz?
In 1996, Dan Morgenstern recommended me to Sheldon Meyer, a longtime editor at Oxford University Press who was responsible for commissioning many of their jazz books.  Sheldon wanted to do a jazz volume for their “Companion” series and asked me to edit it.  After the initial shock wore off, I accepted and set off on a four-year odyssey: 60 articles by 59 writers.

How did you go about identifying who would author the individual chapters in the Oxford Companion to Jazz?
First I had to decide on the nature of the articles themselves, then it was a matter of deciding who would do the best job on each piece. In a way, it was similar to leading a band and writing music for it and deciding who would be the best soloists for each piece.  So the whole thing came rather naturally to me.

Then I got on the phone and made offers to the writers. Very few turned me down, though a few ended up bailing out later on and needed to be replaced.  But for the most part, people delivered the goods for me and on a high level, though not always on deadline.  I earned my honorary Ph.D in psychology doing this book.  It was quite an experience.

Given your special skills as a Jazz musician who can write, over the years you’ve written numerous liner and booklet notes to various recordings. Which of these are among your favorites and why?
I guess that my “magnum opus” was a 40,000-word booklet for Big Band Renaissance: The Evolution of the Jazz Orchestra.  I spent three years on that project, co-producing it and picking five CDs worth of music.  The booklet won a NAIRD “Indie” award for “Best Liner Notes.”

Then there were the booklet notes for Miles Davis and Gil Evans: The Complete Columbia Studio Recordings.  George Avakian, Bob Belden, Phil Schaap, and I won a Grammy for those.

I’m equally proud, however, of the extensive booklet notes I did for Mosaic for their Thad Jones-Mel Lewis and Gerry Mulligan Concert Jazz Band boxed sets.  Needless to say, both of those projects were close to my heart, and I put in a lot of effort to ensure that they were done right.

Overall, I’ve done close to sixty liner note and booklet projects over the years, mostly for reissues but occasionally for new releases. For about a decade, there was a lot of work, but with the decline of the record business and CD sales, the demand for liner notes has slowed down to a trickle.

If you could put on an imaginary 3-Day Jazz Festival in NYC, how would you structure it and whom would you invite to perform?
Let’s just say that I would include both veterans and up-and-comers.
Actually, I would be more interested in focusing on a single project that I could sink my teeth into, rather than having to design an entire festival. When doing what a George Wein does, you always have to be mindful of having enough tushies in seats to justify your overhead.  I’d rather that someone else determined that Concert X would draw, then gave me the responsibility for planning the music and hiring the musicians.

If you were asked to host a television show entitled “The Subject Is Jazz,” whom would you like to interview on the first few episodes?
My models for such a show would be the 1962 Jazz Scene USA hosted by Oscar Brown Jr., and Frankly Jazz, hosted by Frank Evans during the same period.  As long as the musicians are really good, it almost doesn’t matter who they are.  It’s more important that the host not be pontificating or asking vapid questions.  Keep talk to a minimum, as Robert Herridge did with the 1959 The Sound of Miles Davis.  Give essential information, such as the names of musicians and titles of tunes, and use the cameras imaginatively.  Let television do what television does best—engage the audience visually.  Once that is done, then the music can, as they so often say, speak for itself.

You’ve accomplished many wonderful things in your life both personally and professionally. Why is it that Jazz has continued to play a role in your life?
Simple answer: it allows me to make a living doing things I love.  Those things cover a lot of territory—as a composer-arranger, saxophonist, bandleader, jazz historian, record and radio producer, and educator.  Though not all of these things are happening all the time or in equal proportions.  Because I’ve had serious health issues for almost 25 years, I’m physically limited, so I’m fortunate that I have enough skills that enable me to piece together a livelihood.

Years after Artie Shaw quit the music business, he appeared on a TV talk show along with Count Basie.  Shaw asked Basie, “Why don’t you quit this business?”  Basie shrewdly replied: “What would I do?  Be a janitor?”  I understand intimately what Basie meant—at least, in my own way.  This is what we do.

I tell my students:  You’re being trained as jazz improvisers, and part of that skill involves being able to improvise a career.  Many of the onetime ways of making a living in music have evaporated or have sharply diminished.  Now more than ever, every tub, as the saying goes, has to sit on its own bottom.