Sunday, July 17, 2011

Stan Levey – Straight-Ahead and Always Swinging


© -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


“En fait, Stan a été influence par le jeu de Kenny Clarke sur la cymbal ride en accompagnement et par Max Roach pour les solos.”
- Georges Paczynski, Une Historie De La Batterie De Jazz, Vol. 2

“The art of jazz drumming has come a long way since the days of the bass drum player in the marching bands of ole New Orleans. Today we have come to expect a drummer to be an excellent technician, a well rounded percussionist, capable of improvising as well as any solo instrumentalist in any musical aggregation. It would take a very thick book to discuss the requirements of being a jazz drummer, and even then, it would be necessary to interpret the printed word through skins, sticks, cymbals, and mechanical contrivances in order to express yourself and your feeling for the music.

No doubt about it, drums and drummers are popular subjects; whether you're an avid jazz enthusiast or a bandleader, it is always interesting to hear and compare notes on the way different drummers play.”
-Howard Rumsey, Bassist and Jazz Club Operator

“You could set your watch to his time. It was one less thing for me to think about when I was playing.”
- Victor Feldman, Jazz pianist, vibraphonist and drummer


“Mechanical, my foot. You try playing his stuff and see how ‘mechanical’ it is.”

The late drummer, Stan Levey, is the fellow using the strong language [“foot” is substituted here for another part of the anatomy which was actually used by Stan in the quoted remark].

The context for Stan’s reply was his response to a statement that another drummer made about the playing of Max Roach to wit: “Oh, I don’t listen to Max much. He’s too mechanical.”

There is a reason why in his two volume Une Historie De La Batterie De Jazz, which won the 2000 Prix Charles Delauney, author Georges Paczynski follows his chapter on Max Roach with one on Stan Levey.

Stan adored Max.

Indeed, Paczynski subtitles his chapter on Stan :”Stan Levey le virtuose: à l'école de Max Roach.”

Stan was a gruff, no nonsense guy who, at one time, was a prize fighter. He left school at fourteen to make his way in the world, taught himself how to play drums, and did this well enough to be playing with Dizzy Gillespie in his hometown of Philadelphia at the age of sixteen.


Four years later, in 1945, he was working with Diz and Charlie Parker on 52nd Street along with Al Haig on piano and Ray Brown on bass.

Not a bad way to begin a career as a Jazz drummer before even reaching the age of twenty-one [21]!

The early 1940s was also about the time that Max Roach was coming up in the world of bebop and he and Stan were to become lifelong friends. As Howard Rumsey, Jazz bassist, who also was in charge of the music at the Lighthouse Café for many years, explains in his insert notes to Max and Stan’s Drummin’ The Blues:

“Ever since they first met on New York's famous 52nd Street in 1942, Max Roach and Stan Levey have felt intuitively that each was the other's personal preference. Their professional careers are closely paralleled, starting with almost four years on the "Street" with "Diz" and "Bird". In fact, Max was with Diz at the Onyx and Stan was across the street at the Spotlight with Bird when the modern period of jazz was officially born. Since then they have exchanged jobs many times with many great bands.”

Max would eventually recommend that Stan take his place with Howard Rumsey’s Lighthouse All-Stars at the famous 30 Pier Avenue Club in Hermosa Beach, CA and Stan stayed at the club from about 1955 to 1960.

Stan described his early years in the business this way to Gordon Jack in Fifties Jazz Talk, An Oral Perspective:

“I was completely self-taught because we couldn't afford a teacher, and that's why I play left-handed although I am right-handed; it just felt easier that way. I didn't learn to read really well until I joined Kenton's band in 1952, once again teaching myself. By the time I was doing studio work in the sixties and playing all the mallet instruments, I had become an accom­plished reader. My first big influence was Chick Webb, who I saw with Ella when my father took me to the Earle Theater when I was about ten years old.” [p. 129]

And, about his first impressions of Max Roach’s drumming, Stan had this to say:

"The ferocity of the playing was new to me. I had never heard time split up like that. Max's playing had music within it. . . he changed the course of drumming." [p. 130]

I got to know Stan quite well during the last three years of his stint at The Lighthouse and I came to understand that he always had a chip on his shoulder about being self-taught. 


Young drummers bugged him; they were always asking him technical questions about the instrument.

And because he couldn’t explain his answers in terminology or “drum speak,” he usually mumbled something and walked toward the back of the club.

What were you going to do, chase after him? The man was huge. He blocked out the sun.

Stan was never menacing or unkind in any way, he was just self-conscious about the fact that he didn’t have a studied background in the instrument.

Even though he was self-taught, Stan took the most difficult path to becoming a Jazz drummer.

By this I mean that he played everything open; he didn’t cheat or fudge. He didn’t press; didn’t finesse; didn’t adopt shortcuts.

Ironically, for someone who had never formally studied drums, he played them in a more “legit” way than most of the other Jazz drummers in the 1940s, 50s and 60s – many of whom were also self-taught.

To comprehend an open or “legit” sound, think of the crackling snare drums that almost sound like gunshots while listening to a Scottish Black Watch fife, bagpipe and drum corps or, most other drum and bugle corps.

Every drum stroke is sounded; nothing is muffled; nothing is pressed into the drums. Everything is struck. Art Blakey’s famous snare drum press roll would be unacceptable in such an environment.

To play in this manner, one’s hands need to be strong and they need to be fast.

Enter Stan Levey.

Enter Max Roach.



Although they came to their respective styles from different directions – Max had taken lessons - both approached drums the same way. Each relied on open strokes.

In Max’s case, because he had a sound grasp of the basic, drum rudiments and learned to cleverly combine them in a syncopated manner that particularly fit the Bebop style of Jazz, his playing could be described as a “mechanical” in the sense of structured or fundamental.

This is especially the case when Max’s solo style is compared to that of other bebop and hard bop drummers such as Roy Haynes, Art Blakey and Philly Joe Jones.

But Stan didn’t hear the loser and freer drumming of Blakey and Philly Joe when he was putting things together, he heard Max [and also Kenny Clarke, Sid Catlett, and Chick Webb].

And even though he didn’t know the technical names for them, he learned to play solos in a manner similar to Max’s “mechanical” or rudimental style.

I knew Stan to be a fiercely loyal person and a very competitive one.

When your hero and your friend is being “put down” or “disrespected,” isn’t it all the more reason to be defensive and perhaps curt with those implying such disapproval?

Stan knew that what Max was playing wasn’t easy to do. But to his ever-lasting credit, he broke it down and incorporated many elements of Roach’s approach into his own. And, he did it all by ear!

Stan didn’t like to solo. He loved to keep time. He referred to it as: “Doing my job back there.”

And “keep time” he did, with the best of them.

Louie Bellson once said: “Stan’s time is alive. It has a pulse that you can always feel.”

Ray Brown declared him to be – “A rock, and a magnificent one, at that.”

Ella Fitzgerald said: “He never strays and never gets in the way.”

Peggy Lee “loved the intensity [of his time-keeping].”

The other thing that Stan loved to do was keep time FAST!

Few could rival him, and this from a naturally right-handed guy who was playing an open, three stroke cymbal beat with his left hand!!

Some of the best recorded examples of Stan’s time-keeping speed can be found on the Bebop, Wee [Allen’s Alley] and Lover Come Back to Me tracks on Dizzy Gillespie’s For Musicians Only album [Verve 837-435-2].

With someone like Stan, the highest compliment you could pay him would be that as a drummer he was - straight-ahead and always swinging.



Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Christian Jacob: A Jazz Pianist, Composer and Arranger of Distinction




© -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.

“Descriptive words such as ‘virtuoso’ and ‘genius’ are not words I easily throw around. When I first heard Christian Jacob I knew right away his potential for deserving those words and certainly after his tenure with my band I was sure of it!”
- Maynard Ferguson

Every so often, we have a good idea.

Like the time that we suggested to pianist Christian Jacob that he consider doing a recording of the music of the late French pianist, Michel Petrucciani.

Nobody plays Michel’s music; it’s too difficult, let alone, too idiosyncratic.

But in my heart I knew that if anyone could make a success out of attempting it, Christian would be the one and he would make his own statement in the process. He’s too much of a musician and too wonderful a human being not to succeed with a musical exposition honoring the memory of Michel.

After taking a step back to make sure that I wasn’t trying to be cute with some kind of trite idea centered around French Jazz pianist [Christian was born in Metz] plays the music of another French Jazz pianist [Michel was born in Orange], Christian was kind enough to indulge me with a listening of Petrucciani’s music. – which he had never heard!

He and his wife Wilder were at our house for dinner so while it was being prepared by my kind and generous wife, up we went to my study where I played him Michel’s medley of Thelonious Monk’s medley of I Mean You and ‘Round Midnight from the Michel Petrucciani Au Théâtre des Champs Elysées Dreyfus CD [FDM 36570-2].

Christian is not a wordy guy, After intently absorbing all that was on offer in Michel’s 12 minute and 37 second performance, he looked up at me and said: “Sure, Let’s give it a try.”

What guts – oops, I mean - sang-froid!

Most guys would have looked at me and said something to the effect of “Are you crazy? Nobody but Michel can play on these tunes.”

But not Christian; not when there is a challenge to be met. This from one of the quietest, kindest and unpretentious people on the planet. But put him on a piano bench and he becomes a tenacious tiger.

To make a long story, short, I grouped together a bunch of Michel’s tunes and mailed them to Christian.


For a variety of reasons, it took some time for it all to come together, but the result was the issuance in 2006 of Christian’s self-produced Contradictions: A Look at the Music of Michel Petrucciani. [Christian has his own website should you wish to locate information about ordering the CD].

It was worth the wait as the quality of Christian musical tribute to Michel exceeded my expectations.

Christian allowed me the honor of writing the following introduction to the album:

“With the death of Michel Petrucciani on the night of January 5th 1999 at the ridiculously young age of 36, Francis Marmande wrote in La Chambre d'Amour:

‘If the death of a musician touches us in a special way, it is because they take their secrets with them — the secret of their unique musical sound, the secret of their precise relation to space, air and the movement of their bodies that they alone knew how to produce.’

Many of the "secrets" that made Michel and his music so distinctive live on in his legacy of recordings.   However, for those intent on trying to unlock the essence of his musical uniqueness, there are perhaps keys contained in the body of Michel's original compositions left largely unexplored since his passing — until now.

In Christian Jacob, Michel may have found a fellow countryman and kindred spirit who, through his exploration of Michel's tunes, offers some fresh insights into Petrucciani's genius while also revealing his own brilliance.

Such a voyage of discovery is not for the faint of heart. For not only are the compositions difficult to navigate, but Michel himself had become such an authoritative and powerful player by the time of his death that Christian and the trio would be pressed to add to their richness and complexity.

As you will hear in this recording, through his musical courage, strength and originality, Christian has more than met this challenge.  Assisted and inspired by Trey Henry on bass and Ray Brinker on drums, Christian and the trio have created a sparkling homage to Michel.

Into the ‘... space, air and movement in time’ created by the texture and tone of Michel's compositions, Christian has interposed a vitality and an inventive­ness that serve to bring alive Michel's music once again while at the same time making it his own.

It is almost as though Michel had left this music behind for Christian to find and, in so doing, create a bond of musical affection between them. After all, ultimately, our immortality is contained in the memory of others.”

Here are Christian’s introductory notes to the recording:

“Thanks To Steven, for coming up with the original idea for this CD. You were the first to hear its potential. To Dom [Camardella, recording engineer], for being such a perfect pro at what you do. To Michael [Gottlieb, photographer], for those great moments you are able to capture on film. To Jenny [Keresztes], you're the best, your graphic art is always so perfect for my projects. … To Trey [Henry], for being the "road less traveled" bassist, and I mean that in every way. To Ray [Brinker, drummer], for being yourself, your ability to fuse this trio together is astounding. To Tierney [Sutton, vocalist], for your never ending support. To Wilder [Jacob], for being my light. I am so aware of your partnership, and how this project wouldn't be without you. I love you! And finally, To Michel, for coming around this earth of ours and showing me how things are done around here; I feel so close to your music, I just wish I had known you personally. Merci mon ami!”

Gene Lees wrote this overview of Christian’s early years in music through to his 1990s association as a pianist and musical director for trumpeter Maynard Ferguson’s Big Bop Nouveau orchestra.

Christian Jacob started studying piano at the age of four and a half. His father, a jeweler who played piano part-time, gave Christian a book of old songs, including some of George Gershwin's. Christian was immediately fascinated by the harmony.

He won first prize in piano performance at the Conservatoire National de Region in his native Metz in 1970, when he was twelve years old. In 1978, at the age of twenty, he took the same prize at the Con­servatoire National Superieur in Paris. ‘I was always into jazz,' Christian says, ‘and I was playing jazz for recreation, though my teachers at the Conservatory didn't like it and were telling me not to do it. I was interested in it really very early.’ After graduating from the Conservatoire, he went home to teach piano in his old school in Metz. Then he went to the Berklee Col­lege of Music, where he took a degree in professional music magna cum laude. He won the Joe Zawinul Jazz Masters Award at Berklee in 1985, and in 1986 the Oscar Peterson Jazz Masters Award. He then joined the staff of the college, teaching piano there from 1986 to 1990.


A fellow student at Berklee was Wilder Ferguson, one of Maynard Ferguson's four daughters. She was studying voice. In 1984 Christian gave her a tape to give to May­nard, who was impressed by it — so much so that he began to use Christian on the road in a quintet. Meanwhile, relations with Wilder Ferguson were growing closer, and in October 1989 she and Christian were married. Soon after that they moved to California where Christian became musical director and arranger for May-nard's Big Bop Nouveau Band.

Christian has also worked with Michael Brecker, Eddie Gomez, Steve Gadd, Peter Erskine, John Abercrombie, and Benny Carter, and toured extensively with Gary Burton, who recorded some of Christian's compositions.” [Jazz Lives: 100 Portraits in Jazz, p. 184].

More information about the last decade or so of Christian’s career are available on his website. The highlights include his long association with Jazz vocalist Tierney Sutton, performing and writing for both the Bill Holman and Carl Saunders big bands, and fronting his trio on record and in concert and club appearances.

Equally important to who he is and where he works as a Jazz musician is the fact that Christian has continued to grow and develop as a person of quality, both in terms of his music and in terms of his character.

As Louis Armstrong once said: “Jazz is who you are.”

Christian Jacob’s qualities as a person of skill, substance and sensitivity radiate through his music.

Merci, mon ami. The world is a richer place because of who you are, Christian.


The audio track on the following video tribute to Christian was recorded during his trio’s January 29, 2006 performance at George Klabin’s Rising Jazz Stars Foundation in Beverly Hills, CA. The tune is Michel Petrucciani’s Brazilian Suite No. 1

Christian and the trio, Trey Henry on bass and Ray Brinker on drums, would go into Sound Design Studios in Santa Barbara, CA the following day to conclude their recordings for the Contradictions tribute CD to Michel that began on December 30, 2005 and January 17, 2006, respectively.




Sunday, July 10, 2011

Dutch Jazz : Yesterday and Today






© -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.

Recently a friend in Oregon sent the editorial staff of JazzProfiles the Dutch National Public Service radio broadcast of the Jazz Orchestra of the Concertgebouw’s April 28, 2011 performance featuring Jan van Duikeren, one of Holland’s premier Jazz trumpeters.

Thanks also to the generosity of a close friend in Holland, we have been able to listen to Dutch Jazz dating back to the 1950s right up to those creating the music for Holland’s contemporary Jazz scene.

As our previous features on the subject have indicated, The Netherlands has a long-established involvement with Jazz which has been fostered and developed by a number of resident large orchestras such as The Metropole, Rotterdam and Concertgebouw, a variety of fun-to-listen-to small groups and a whole host of engaging, individual soloists.

In order to share with visitors to JazzProfiles examples of both early and recent forms of Jazz in Holland, we asked the crackerjack graphics team at CerraJazz LTD to develop the following videos.

The April 28, 2011 Jazz Orchestra of the Concertgebouw [JOC] April 28, 2011 Bimhuis concert featuring the marvelous Dutch trumpet player Jan van Duikeren is the source for the audio tracks on the first, two of these. Henk Meutgeert is the musical director of the JOC and deserves a great deal of credit for the consistently high quality of its music.

On the first video, Jan performs his original compositions, No Flowers, while the second, continuation video puts pianist Peter Beets in the solo spotlight playing 1912 Seventh Avenue. The graphics for the second video consist of a retrospective of classic Dutch LP covers which we hope will help underscore the longevity of Dutch Jazz.



And here are the insert notes to a retrospective CD by The Diamond Five, one of the earliest Dutch Jazz quintets, after which you will a video tribute to the group.

“Time and again during the past decade or so John Engels would say to me: ‘Cees, don’ t you think its time for a CD of the Diamond Five? Isn’t there any way, any possibility to get this done?' And invariably my reply would be that in this day and age where especially in the entertainment business, most art forms are so volatile and everything has to be always new and different, nobody will be waiting for the recordings of a Jazz quintet from the sixties, and not even an American jazz quintet at that! So who on earth would be interested to furnish the money to realize such a project?

And then, out of a clear blue sky, here comes this man Henk Toorenvliet who not only is interested to release a Diamond Five CD and is prepared to invest in the project, but also goes out of his way to find out where the tapes are and who owns the recording rights and how he can lay his hands on them which, with all the recent mergers in the record industry appears to be not all that easy.  But with the determination and perseverance of a terrier  or should I say of a Jack Russell? - he sets his teeth into the matter and he gets it done!


Thanks so much Henk. We really are very much indebted to you for this.

So here it is. Music we recorded in the sixties as it appeared on our LP Highlights from the 60's which is now a collector’s item The second and third sentences of the liner notes I wrote on the cover of that album read as follows:  When we had that good feeling making our first recording in Brussels way back in 1959, we had no way of even suspecting that (now) in 1978 we would have that same good feeling listening to Alone Together and Diamondate   Much less that we would like the material to be reissued.  Now I may add: Let alone that in the 21st century this would happen again now taking advantage of great new techniques to make the sound even better.

We are all very proud and grateful that we had this rare opportunity to make a band that people later would refer to as the legendary Diamond Five. Something to rejoice for us.

Sadly the most legendary member of our group, Cees Smal [trumpet/flugelhorn] cannot share this with us. After a long illness he passed away on May 24, 2001. And let there be no doubt about this: Without Cees enormous drive and enthusiasm, his grand musicianship and his arranging skill, the Diamond Five would have been but a shadow of what they have become with him.  Fortunately Cees knew this CD was going to be released and he was thrilled by the idea.

And thus I may speak for all five of us whishing our many fans who will hear and/or own this CD many happy listening hours.

And. surprise! There's more to come after this one. so watch cut!”

- Cees Slinger, pianist, arranger and composer


"Highlights from the 60’s was the apt title for the LP compilation that was released in 1978. Although the original Diamonds were founded in the fifties, their 'finest hour' so to speak was their tenure at the Scheherazade Club in Amsterdam, where the band resided from October 1958 through April 1962. As a result no post-war Dutch jazz quintet with a bebop site has played as tastefully and with more tightness than The Diamond Five

I first encountered ‘The Diamonds from Haalem’ at a concert in the Stadsgehoorzaal in Leiden in the summer of 1955.

Cees Smal on valve trombone and Harry Verbeke on tenor sax were then front-lining Wim van Beelen, piano, Henk de Jong, bass, and Tonv Funke-Kupper on drums. In their neatly striped jackets and dark pants they performed standards along with original compositions by Cees Smal, who already then proved to be a real 100 carat diamond!

Actually this was the second version of the group, the first one having, beside Cees Smal on trumpet, Ruud Brink on tenor sax, Cees Slinger on piano Henk de Jong on bass and Ruud’s brother Han Brink on drums.

But the real Diamond Five - a little later so re-baptized when a popular duo called the Blue Diamonds scored a huge hit in Holland with their rendition of the old war-horse Ramona - were actually born when Cees Slinger was requested by the then owner of the Scheherazade to form a band that would pep up the place again after some bands of lesser quality had caused business to be slow. Slinger was lucky to recruit Harry Verbeke and Cees Smal whose catchy tunes and arranging skills were to become the most valuable asset of the group. The quintet was competed by John Engels on drums and Dick van der Capellen on bass, the latter soon after to be replaced by Jacques Schols.

And thus the languid lyrical lines of Harry Verbeke and the masterful versatility of Cees Smal were a perfect match for the great soloing and comping of pianist Cees Slinger the big booming bass of Jacques Schols and the ever-propelling, flexible timekeeping of drummer John Engels.

A typical night at the "ZADE" for me was a wet walk from the tram stop at the Rembranctplein trying to get in past doorman Willem Ruska (to later become 1972 Olympic champion judo in Munich) then opening the thick-padded door looking for a seat and finally winding up standing in front of someone.

Taking in the immense cloud of cigarette smoke, not thinking of all the alcohol in rows of bottles on the left side of the bandstand, I would soon be deeply immersed in the music just wondering who would drop in to jam.

It all comes back listening to the highlights from the 60's for the first time on CD, sounding as fresh as if recorded yesterday Thanks to the engineers and of course the cats that bared their souls in Brussels, Amsterdam and Hilversum some forty years ago.”


- Cees Schrama
host TROS SESJUN
(live jazz radio show)



Friday, July 8, 2011

Nat King Cole – Jazz Pianist




© -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.

“Billy May is not one of your more maudlin chaps. It's hard to imagine him getting teary-eyed even when he talks about people that meant a great deal to him. His memories of Nat King Cole are about as sentimental as I've ever heard him get. ‘Nat was just a wonderful guy,’ May says. ‘He was also a talented and a very capable musician. He had a very open mind about music ... and everything. Nat was always a good musician and he never caused anybody any harm. He was a wonderful man.’"
- Will Friedwald, insert notes to Nat King Cole: The Billy May Sessions

Who knew?

My earliest impressions of Nat King Cole were based on the fact that he was as huge star – a popular vocalist with a slew of hit records, a highly rated television show and a celebrity status of enormous proportions.

For a while, he appeared to be everywhere: on billboards as you drove up the Sunset Strip in Hollywood, CA; on magazine covers; in television commercials.

It seems as though each month he had a hit record, was appearing as a guest artist on a television variety show [when not hosting his own], or was involved in some Beverly Hills gathering that made the society pages of the newspaper.

The Jazz pianists with whom I worked mentioned names like Bud Powell or Lennie Tristano or Dodo Marmorsa or Al Haig, among a host of other bebop era pianists when listing their favorites.

Art Tatum’s named was mentioned with lips parted in reverence and eyes lifted toward the heavens, but few brought up Early Jazz or Swing Era pianists among their direct influences. There was no mention of Earl “Fatha” Hines, or Thomas “Fats” Waller or Teddy Wilson, let alone, Nat King Cole.

For as Gene Lees asserts:

“Ironically, Nat Cole is remembered by the general public only as a singer, though he was one of the greatest pianists in jazz history, and one of the most influential.

Horace Silver once told me that when he first played the Newport Jazz Festival, impresario George Wein stood offstage calling out, "Earl Fatha Hines, Earl Fatha Hines!" This baffled Horace, since he had never listened to Hines. But later, he said, he realized that he had listened a lot to Nat Cole, and he had listened to Hines.

And that Cole assuredly did, in Chicago, when he was growing up. He would stand outside the Grand Terrace Ballroom listening to Hines, absorbing all he could.

Hines is a headwater of jazz piano, perhaps one should say the headwater, because of the influence he had on pianists who were themselves immensely influential, no one more so than Teddy Wilson, Bud Powell, and Bill Evans.

Who was this Nat Cole?”


Irony upon irony, I first became familiar with Nat King Cole’s history as a Jazz pianist while working a trio gig at the Swanee Inn on North La Brea Boulevard in Hollywood, CA. Sitting at the bar during one of our breaks, I noticed a photograph of Nat seated at the club’s piano and asked the bartender if he knew anything about it.

The bar keep replied that: “Oh, he got his start here playing solo piano.”

By way of background, Nat King Cole had been a minor celebrity on the South Side of Chicago where he began his career in the mid-1930s. In January, 1937, he married Nadine Robinson, a beautiful dancer, and the two of them went on the road with a variety show - Shuffle Along.

Shortly after the show opened in Long Beach, CA in May, 1937, someone made off with the payroll and Nat and Nadine were stranded in Los Angeles.

Gene Lees picks up the story from here:

“For a time Nat was playing solo piano. He was ap­proached by Bob Lewis, who owned a nightclub called the Swanee Inn. Lewis asked him to organize a small group and bring it into his club. Nat engaged Wesley Prince, a bassist he'd heard with Lionel Hampton, and the Texas-born guitarist Oscar Moore. There are conflicting theories of why he didn't also use drums. One is that Lee Young didn't show up on opening night. This is unlikely. Lee Young was as responsible and punctilious as his brother Lester was elusive. One story is that Lee thought the bandstand was too small for a quartet with drums. In any event, Cole went in with a trio, and if it was not unprecedented, piano-guitar-bass had not evolved to the heights of integration and sophistication he, Moore (later Irving Ashby), and Prince (later Johnny Miller) would take that instrumentation. They stayed at the Swanee Inn for six months, honing their material in the luxury of a secure situation.”

Gene goes on to say that:

“The Nat Cole trio in its early days had recorded for Decca, [he was twenty-three]….

The first recording strike by the American Federation of Musicians was about to hit the industry, and Johnny Mercer's newly-formed label Capitol acquired some Cole sides from the small Excelsior label, ….

Other than some of those earlier records and transcriptions, and a few extracur­ricular dates for Norman Granz later, Cole's entire body of recorded work was for Capitol. The chemistry of Cole-and-Capitol would propel him to a stardom that has not ended, though he has been dead thirty-five years.


The body of that work is among the most significant in American musical history. In 1991, Mosaic, the independent reissue label notable for the reverent quality of its product, acquired all the Capitol records on which Cole played piano and put them out in a boxed set. The arrangement covered such performances with orchestra as Nature Boy and The Christmas Song on which he played piano, but not those orchestral performances on which he only sang.

This Mosaic set of 18 CDs constitutes some of the most significant jazz documentation we have. Alas, you can't get it. It came out as a limited edition that has long been sold out. With 19 or 20 takes on each CD, the collection contains 347 tracks, including alternate takes. By my count, 64 of these are instrumentals, mostly by the trio.”

The editorial staff of JazzProfiles was fortunate enough to “be in the right place at the right time” to acquire The Complete Capitol Recordings Of The Nat King Cole Trio [Mosaic MD18-138].

Among the vast insert notes assembled for the Mosaic set is an overview by Dick Katz of what made Nat's style so distinctive and why it was so influential.

Dick, who passed away in 2010, was a pianist, composer and arranger who performed with the J.J. Johnson – Kai Winding Quintet, Oscar Pettiford, Carmen McRae, Sonny Rollins, Coleman Hawkins, Philly Joe Jones, Jim Hall, Helen Merrill, Lee Konitz, Roy Eldridge, Benny Carter and Many others.

No one explains the workings of Jazz piano better than Dick Katz, who also authored the retrospective on the history of the instrument in Bill Kirchner, ed., The Oxford Companion to Jazz.

Michael Cuscuna of Mosaic Records has graciously consented to allow us to reprint Dick’s writings on “Nat Cole – Jazz Pianist,” at the conclusion of which you will find a video tribute to Nat and the trio featuring their 1946 version of Sweet Georgia Brown.

© -Dick Katz/Mosaic Records; used with the permission of Mosaic Records; copyright protected, all rights reserved.


“When Nat Cole got up from the piano bench in the 1950's and concentrated primarily on his singing career, he inter­rupted one of the most brilliant sagas in jazz piano history. Of course, the transition was relatively gradual, because almost from the start, his vocal output with the King Cole Trio had met with considerable success, including a number of hit singles.

The realities of earning a living as a serious jazz musician obliged artists of an earlier era, including Nat Cole, to conform to the vagaries, and often indignities, of show business. (This writer vividly remembers waiting in line with Nat—sometime in the late 50’s, when he was already an international celebrity—to be fingerprinted for a cabaret card, then an odious requirement of all New York night club employees.) As jazz improvisation became increasingly complex, so did the problem of getting and keeping an audience. Early masters like Louis Armstrong and Fats Waller (and later ones like Dizzy Gillespie) met this problem head-on by dividing their performances between instrumental segments and vocals, which made more direct contact with their listeners. Humor was often an all-important factor.

Pacing, dynamics, programming and the element of surprise were all essential ingredients of success. Nat Cole exemplified this approach; he was also a physically imposing figure whose sheer presence on the bandstand made an indelible impression. Above all, he was an extraordinary talent, like few others, because in addition to his obvious gifts, he had that rarity— exquisite taste—both pianistically and vocally.

Although Cole was born in Montgomery, Alabama, his father, a Baptist minister, moved the family to Chicago when Nat was a young child. His early exposure to church music and the flourishing Chicago jazz and blues scene was evidently crucial to his development.

"My church work was a constant worry to Dad," Cole has been quoted as saying. "I was inclined to play the accompani­ments too much on the hot side, which resulted in a familiar raising of the eyebrows that meant, Tone it down, son, or take the consequences later.'" (His mother's view—and she was the church's music director—is not recorded.)

Jazz history overflows with statements from major black artists who cite the church's powerful influence on their music. The Baptist, and, particularly the Holiness Church, are famous for being the source of the irresistible rhythmic thrust of a special kind of gospel music. Jazz greats like Milt Jackson are referred to as being "sanctified," although this musical credential does not always guarantee the greatness he achieved.

Chicago's great jazz and blues culture was an even more decisive influence. The New Orleans masters like King Oliver and Louis Armstrong had flocked there a little before Nat's time, but Louis' records with the Hot Five and Seven were surely a part of Cole's musical upbringing. And he undoubt­edly heard other giants, like clarinetist Jimmy Noone at the Apex Club (whose pianist was Karl Mines.) Noone's theme song was Sweet Lorraine, which became one of Cole's most popular numbers. Art Tatum also worked a lot in Chicago in the 1930's, as did Fats Waller and Teddy Wilson. Then there were the boogie woogie masters—Jimmy Yancey, Meade Lux Lewis and Albert Ammons, whose approach and feeling clearly influenced Cole, especially in his remarkable blues playing.


Blues of every kind were an important cultural force in Chicago's African-American community. The migration from the South brought many great rural artists and later resulted in the development of an urban blues tradition and a great body of recorded work by such artists as Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf and others. All of this heady music undoubtedly influenced the young Nat Cole's musical perceptions and overall jazz conception.

In retrospect, however, Earl "Fatha" Hines would have to be identified as the primary and original inspiration. Cole grew up near the famous Grand Terrace, where Hines and his band were featured for 12 eventful years from 1928-1940. legend has it that an underage Nat used to listen to the band from the alley next to the club. In Stanley Dance's book. The World of Earl Hines, the songwriter and manager Charlie Carpenter quotes Nat Cole as saying, "Everything I am I owe to that man, because I copied him. Of course, through the years I've gotten away from him, but I'll never forget him, because he was my idol. He was always kind to me, and never too busy to say hello or to show me something."

Even Cole's physical demeanor at the keyboard resembled Hines. He often faced the audience at a right angle from the piano, while his hands seemed to have a life of their own. Cole's ability to accompany his singing in such a creative and independent way was truly remarkable, and was something he perfected independent of the Hines effect.

Cole's distinctive piano style developed fairly rapidly. His first recording date was in 1936 with a band led by his older brother, Eddie Cole, for Decca. Nat was only 19 years old, but had already mastered the essentials of Hines' style. The lightning-fast octave passages and the syncopated left-hand punctuations were fully assimilated. But in the manner of most youngsters, he tried to show all of his "stuff" at once.

In the years that followed, he absorbed gradually some of the harmonic savvy of Tatum, the rhythmic bite of Billy Kyle (also a Hines disciple) and the cool precision and assurance of Teddy Wilson, often expressed by the walking tenths in the left hand. But by 1943, when the Nat King Cole Trio began recording for Capitol Records, the pianist had added many innovative features to his playing, some of which pre-dated or coincided with the advent of bebop.

Harmonically, Cole far outdistanced both Hines and Wilson. Only Tatum surpassed him (and, for that matter, every other pianist) in that department.

This example (Figure A), excerpted from Easy Listenning Blues shows some of Cole's characteristic harmonic touches. Note the B-flat major seventh and C minor seventh suspension in bar 3, and also the descending minor sevenths in bar 8. Chromatic minor sevenths were to become commonplace from 1945 on, particularly in the blues and in "turnarounds" on standard tunes. Note, too, the II-7 to V-7 progression in bar 9.


When Easy Listenin’ Blues was recorded in 1944, these devices were quite rare. So either Cole initiated this himself, or he picked it up from some early "bopper." Ken Kersey was another pianist who was using minor sevenths at the time— but one can only speculate about who did what first.

Nat Cole's playing was so rich and many-faceted that any analysis can only scratch the surface. Understanding the technicalities can never substitute for feeling what he played.

The most striking feature of Cole's mature pianism was its singing quality. His single-note lines were very vocal-like and his actual singing perfectly matched his playing, both rhythmically and melodically. He was blessed with one of the most beautiful touches ever, pearly but firm, and he made everything he played come to life. He was vibrant without shouting. He was cool in the best sense of the word—great power, but always under control. He embellished the com­posed melodies of standards and originals in the manner of the great Jazz horn stylists—Armstrong, Roy Eldridge and Benny Carter, to name a few.

I think it was Thelonious Monk who once told me, "If you can't play [improvise] a chorus at least as good as the tune you're playing, you're in trouble." Of course, Nat Cole, like all the masters, constantly did just that. And his statements of the original melody always seemed definitive, as if his was the only right way to play the melody. Sometimes his way of phrasing a song reminds me of Lester Young, whose laid-back conception must have affected Cole; his collaborations with Prez did indeed produce some masterpieces.


Probably the key element in Cole's style was his way with rhythm. One of the reasons he never sounds dated, even today, is his utterly relaxed way with the beat. He had thoroughly absorbed the 12/8 feel (think 4/4 in triplets) of the Southwest­ern blues players and the boogie woogie pianists. Also, he often favored those down-home, just-right, slow-to-medium walking tempos that the original Count Basic band played so well. In this regard he differs markedly from his predecessors, Hines, Waller, and even Wilson, who stated the beat more obviously, and more formally. Hines, of course, was metrically very complex, but he had an on-rushing quality which was quite different from Cole's later work.

To be specific, Cole's use of both quarter-note and eighth-note triplets gave his playing at medium tempos a lope and swing that no other pianist of the time had perfected to the same degree. These features are beautifully illustrated by this example (Figure B) from I Can’t See For Lookin’.


Like the great Southwestern players — Lester Young, Charlie Christian and others—Cole always "'told a story." His solos usually had a well-defined beginning, middle and ending. The ability to do this in just 16 bars, or one chorus, is a skill that has largely disappeared. The limits of 78-rpm records imposed a discipline that only the most creative musicians truly mastered.

Nat Cole was also an exceptional blues player, as was Tatum. although he was seldom thought of as such. Hines, Waller and Wilson, as great as they were, didn't relate to the blues as well as the Kansas City-based pianists like Pete Johnson, or Mary Lou Williams, or even Count Basie, whose own playing, in his New Jersey youth, had been much stiffer and less bluesy than it later became.

A beautiful example of Nat's blues prowess is Blues In My Shower. This piece has no theme or composed melody, but his improvisation is so vocal-like in its melodic contours that it is easy to imagine lyrics being put to it. Like many great blues performers, he gives the chord progressions less importance than the continuity and character of the melody and the projection of the blues feeling.

At faster tempos, Cole's playing was more straight-ahead, and he liked to display his considerable piano "chops," as he does on Jumpin’ At The Capitol. This carefully arranged piece shows his debt to Teddy Wilson in the two-handed passages.

Not to be overlooked is the influence of classical music on his playing. His non-syncopated use of thirds, and occasional quotes from classical composers, were probably commercial gestures (also used successfully by Tatum and his trio). A brilliant example is Cole's carefully worked out solo on Body and Soul, where he makes liberal use of Grieg's In The Hall Of The Mountain King. This solo is truly one of Cole's recorded masterpieces and he used portions of it intact in other performances of the tune. (For an in-depth analysis of this solo, see Gunther Schuller's book. The Swing Era.)


Body and Soul also offers a choice example of Cole's skill with block chords, a device he perfected early in his career. Other pianists, like George Shearing, used them in a more dazzling fashion, but none have surpassed Cole's expressiveness in the idiom. Of course. Milt Buckner is acknowledged as the originator of the technique.

No discussion of Nat King Cole's jazz contribution would be complete without pointing out the significance of the trio as a truly innovative force on the jazz and pop music scene.

The idea of a drummer-less trio was unheard of in 1937. But in Oscar Moore, Cole found a guitarist who was a perfect foil and musical partner. Moore expanded the harmonic and rhythmic language on his instrument as much as Cole did on the piano and, together, they found a way to blend with each other that has never been duplicated or improved upon. As this writer knows first-hand, piano and guitar are often incompatible, especially when both are playing chords. But Cole and Moore never got in each other's way, and the contrapuntal and ensemble passages they came up with are still amazing to behold. It is fair to say that Oscar Moore has never gotten his due, and has been sadly neglected by the critical establishment.

Not to be forgotten, either, is the work of his bassists, first Wesley Prince, then Red Callender, Johnny Miller and Joe Comfort. While not innovators like Moore, their steady and sensitive playing kept things flowing—the right word for the trio's irresistible pulse. And, as Callender recalls in his 1985 autobiography, ‘Nat was a very thorough arranger—that's why everything came off so well.’ This is a slight oversimplifica­tion, but it does emphasize that structure and organization are essential elements of musical communication, ones that many talented ensembles have perhaps unwisely downplayed in more recent times.

A good demonstration of this structure is the trio's recording of Rachmaninoff's Prelude In C Sharp Minor. Although the arrangement is credited (in the Capitol Songs Nat Cole Folio] to Nadine Robinson, Nat's first wife, it obviously has Cole's stamp on it—especially the way it is condensed to fit the three-minute time limit. (This "Third Stream" rendition predated the Modern Jazz Quartet— another structure-conscious group — by at least 10 years.) Most of Cole's trio's recordings benefit from this acute and razor-sharp sense of pacing and contrast. This fact alone had a great deal to do with the trio's ability to reach millions of non-jazz oriented listeners.

Coming on the heels of the big-band era, the trio proved you didn't have to shout to really swing, and it laid the foundation for countless piano-guitar-bass combos. It preceded the Art Tatum Trio by several years, and the Oscar Peterson and Ahmad Jamal trios, too. (The Tatum trio in particular invites comparison because both Cole and Tatum sprinkled their work with "quotes"—everything from nursery rhymes to the classics. This device was a sure-fire way to get attention from noisy, boozing audiences.) However, the Tatum and later, the Peterson trios were often dominated by the pianists' virtuosity.

A final word about Cole's influence as a pianist. His deep "groove," harmonic awareness, supple phrasing, touch, dynamics, taste, and just plain delicious music had a profound effect on the following, to name only a few: Oscar Peterson, Hank Jones, Tommy Flanagan, Al Haig, Bill Evans, Wynton Kelly, Ahmad Jamal, Monty Alexander, and many others, including myself.

Nat "King" Cole was aptly named. Just as surely as Duke Ellington and Count Basie, Nat Cole was musical royalty. He was totally unique, and not the least of his accomplishments was his success in reaching millions while not compromising his musical standards, ever.

His music was pleasure-oriented. He wasn't interested in being the subject of the kind of analysis that puts jazz under glass to be dissected like a butterfly. But the end result has been that his piano playing satisfies on every level, including the intellectual.

Long live the King!”