Showing posts with label gil evans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gil evans. Show all posts

Thursday, September 11, 2025

Claude Thornhill, Gil Evans and Gerry Mulligan: Three of a Mind

 © Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


“Well, I suppose it must have been after the Krupa band that I started to play the baritone. I don't really know why I did it. I hung out sometimes with a baritone player named Johnny Dee who played with Frankie Carle's band. He was very interested in horns for their own sake. I don't know if he was teaching or buying and selling horns, but for some reason I made the decision. I don't know if it was anything that Johnny said, or if he had an influence on me or what it was. I can't recall. But it seemed like a pretty arbitrary thing to do. I took the old horns that I had—my alto, tenor, and my clarinet—and sold them, and decided I was just going to play baritone. Why I did it, I never really understood, because I hadn't really been playing it. I wasn't playing baritone with Ike Carpenter, I wasn't playing baritone with Krupa's band ever, so it was just one of those kinds of left-field decisions that I've never been able to rationalize in any way, but that's what I did. I was always kind of sorry that I did because I wound up never finding an alto I liked as much as the one that I sold. Later on I went and bought one, and I never played it much because I never liked it. Same thing with the tenor. So it was all of those things that kept me playing baritone. I wasn't even tempted to play the other horns. And that was the beginning of it. I started going to jam sessions playing nothing but baritone. When I worked with a band it was on baritone.


I had always been fascinated with the role the baritone played in the band. It wasn't just the bottom note, instrument or ensemble. But a lot of the bands, a lot of the arrangers that I liked used the baritone in a way that was very melodic. And, of course, Ellington's band, the way it appears is that Duke wrote the top line of the ensemble, the melody line for the trumpet, and he wrote a bottom line that was the baritone. There was a lot of contrary motion in these two lines, and then you could figure what the rest of the section is doing based on these two main lines. So that means the baritone line was essential to the ensemble, and I liked that very much. ….


Most of the bands when they added a fifth saxophone, a baritone sax, they stuck it on the bottom like a tuba, which can be boring to play. But if you've got something interesting in the ensemble, it's a great register. It's like playing the cello in an orchestra, which is a beautiful register in relationship to the whole ensemble.


In fact, I've often thought, when people ask me, "Why did you choose baritone instead of alto?" I said, "Well, if I had been a string player in my youth, I probably would have chosen cello over violin for the same reason." There's just something about the register that you are attracted to, that you choose to play in. The cello and the baritone are both very much human voice registers.”

- Gerry Mulligan in Being Gerry Mulligan: My Life in Music with Ken Poston [2023]


“Gil, instead of offering any advice at all, was mad at me. That was no help. I really needed some direction. Somebody had to tell me because I didn't know how to deal with people. It was hard to get along because I've always, with my quick temper . . . things would erupt out of my mouth that were not what I wanted to say but then the damage would be done and I didn't know how to undo it. That led to a lot of personal trouble for me in dealing with people.” 

- Gerry Mulligan in Being Gerry Mulligan: My Life in Music with Ken Poston [2023]


As Gerry moved from his early associations with the Gene Krupa, Tommy Tucker and Elliot Lawrence big bands, his next musical environment found his music shaped and molded by a tenure with the Claude Thornhill Orchestra and one of its principal arrangers, Gil Evans.


Also reflected in the following piece is Jeru’s astute awareness - Mulligan was a keen observer of people, places and things. He didn’t miss much about what was going on around him.


Unfortunately, though, his observational acumen notwithstanding, this was still a period when the early Mulligan lacked the social skills he needed to interact successfully with people in general and other musicians in particular.


CLAUDE AND GIL from Gerry Mulligan in Being Gerry Mulligan: My Life in Music with Ken Poston [2023]


“There is a kind of irony about the Thornhill band, or a coincidence at least. I had loved the band as a kid still in high school, and I started getting Thornhill records because the sound of the band was beautiful. I always thought that Claude approached writing for a dance band as if it were an orchestra, and even though there were no strings, he always used, in the early band especially, two clarinets. A lot of the time people thought there were French horns in the band, but there weren't. In the early band it was just five brass and the four saxes plus two clarinets, and he managed to get those orchestral sounds that way. It was the clarinets that did it, not the French horn. Later on he did have French horns because that enhanced the thing and gave it more depth, but even so, as an orchestration device, you can get those kinds of orchestral, faraway sounds that they did so well. There was always imagination in the arrangements. They always came up with some kind of unique approach to tunes. There were some things they played that were just so imaginative and beautiful to me, and he had a great vocal group that they used in interesting ways.


At one period during the early war years, or even before the war, maybe starting in 1939 or so, Glenn Miller had a daily half-hour broadcast. It was a very popular show even though it was on at 6:00 a.m. or what seemed like an ungodly time, but it was, I suppose, before the news or after. It became like an important slot for a music program. It was very popular.


Then, after a while, they stretched the show and did another segment that had Claude Thornhill's band on it. So for a while it was Glenn Miller, I think for a half-hour, and then Thornhill's band for a half-hour. I loved the band. Then when Miller and his band were drafted into the service, Claude was given the Glenn Miller time slot, so he was really set up to become the most popular band in the country. And it was popular. People loved it.


So things were really looking up for a while and then, after not too long a time, Claude got drafted and it wasn't a high-profile draft. He chose to go into the navy and Miller got into the air force; I guess it was still called the air corps then. Miller was made a major and was high profile. And you know, they made a big fuss about it, and it was something that everybody felt something about.


Claude, on the other hand, ended up being like a chief petty officer or something because the navy wasn't about to make any musicians into officers. They figured that the upstart air force could do that, but the navy was not about to breach tradition. So none of the musicians were made officers. Claude became the piano player in Artie Shaw's band, and Shaw was a chief petty officer. I don't know what rank they gave to Claude, but number one, it was low profile, and number two, it was really tough because they sent those guys out to the South Pacific and they had some hair-raising stories to tell.


Artie left after a while. I don't know how long he was out there. Claude took it over, and from all of the accounts that I've heard about it, Claude was really remarkable out there. He'd play a piano if they had one or he'd play accordion if they didn't. He proceeded to try to make good music for the guys, island hopping for God's sake, flying island to island and going around playing for the guys. I mean, it was really physically tough and I don't know how many years they did that; really something.


So finally, when the war was over and Claude came back, I heard that they were reorganizing, and I was back in New York staying at the Edison Hotel. I had a room that was on the back of the building, which meant it faced the back of all these other buildings. So it was like a great big, not just a little air shaft, but a big air well between the buildings.


The first morning I was there I hear music, and I open up my window and I say, "My God, that sounds just like Claude Thornhill’s band. It must be somebody playing records or something somewhere," and I listen. They play the thing through and a while passes, and they start playing the thing again and they stop. I say, "My God, they're rehearsing," and it turns out my room was just about over where the rehearsal hall was.


I had this friend who was like one of my crazy Texas friends who just loved music. He was a guitar player, but he just loved to be on the scene and he was fun-loving. His name actually was David Wheat but his nickname was Buckwheat, and it fit him down to the ground. He was really a character. He showed up in my room and he had some good Texas pot or something, so we'd sit there and smoke and listen to Thornhill's band as long as they rehearsed. For the whole week, every morning and into the afternoon, the band would be rehearsing.


So I heard them when they were putting it together again. I was like the kid in the candy store. I never did go down to the rehearsals at that point because I always hated to interrupt some place if I didn't know somebody.

At some point I had gone back to Philadelphia and I was living there. One day I got a postcard from Gil Evans that said, "What the hell are you doing in Philadelphia? Come to New York where everything is happening. . . . Gil."

I had met Gil Evans, most likely when I was with Krupa's band. I remember going to some place in New York and I met Gil, who was there backstage, and we became friends.


I said, "Well, I guess you're right." I took off for New York and found myself a place to live and proceeded to hang out at Gil's place most of the time. Finally, Gil talked to Claude and Claude invited me to write for the band, and it was just kind of a natural evolution.


My first arrangement was "Poor Little Rich Girl," which Claude liked a lot. So they used to use that as the opener from then on, kind of the warm-up piece. Gil and Claude always felt that Gil's writing and my writing, and also Bill Borden’s writing, all kind of fit together. Even though there were different stylistic things, they were kind of complementary to each other.


So that worked out nicely, and I wrote for the band for quite a while. I was very much in awe of Claude, you know. Claude was such a shy man and I was always basically kind of shy and reticent, so our conversations together were always a lot of hemming and hawing, and neither of us could talk to each other.


I never intended to play with the band, but they were going out on a tour and Gil and Claude wanted me to go with the band at that point. What had happened was we spent a lot of time having sessions in New York. Whenever the band was in town, the rhythm section, who were all kind of disciples of Gil, would always get together and blow with Danny Polo, the clarinetist, and maybe one or two other guys.


I was playing with them a lot in that way, so it seemed a natural evolution to go out and play with the band for a while. I was out with them for a few months, I guess. It wasn't a terribly long time and it wasn't the greatest period for the band either, because that was the time when things were starting to fall apart in the whole music business. I think they had a hell of a time keeping the band working and getting a price for the band. It started to happen in 1948. That must have been kind of a crucial year. The bands started to disband one after another because the guys just didn't have the money to sustain themselves. Duke, for years, sustained himself on his composer's royalties and ASCAP royalties and sank the money into the band and kept his band going. But not everybody had the means to do it. I remember Count Basie in the early 1950s went out with about a seven-piece band after he disbanded. Woody even, for a while, had a small band so it really died very quickly; going from having hundreds and hundreds of bands all over the country, it just sort of disappeared.


The focus was moved. I guess all of show business was in kind of a ferment; they didn't know quite what to do with themselves. It was also a transition from the important days of radio. Radio was still it, you know. What the family did in the 1930s, man, you had your favorite show, the Jack Benny show and the Fred Allen show and Burns & Allen and so on and everybody would sit and look at the radio set. But radio was great, and as a social focus I always felt radio was a healthy evolution and television was unhealthy, because radio did things that you still had to use your own imagination; you did your own visualizing. Television does it all for you, you know; you're just kind of a blob who sits and reacts to all of this. When you compare the stuff they do now to the science fiction things they did in the 1940s and 1950s, I mean, there's no comparison, and the 1930s even more so, though I must say the Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers things were quite satisfying when we were kids.


But musically it was a good period for me because the band traveled by cars most of the time at that period, and Danny liked to have his own car. Because I was young and strong, I always had the first gig of driving after the dance was over. Danny and I liked to take back roads instead of going on the main highways. We'd say, "This road looks good on the map." So we wandered around and sometimes wound up in the middle of somebody's farm in Indiana at six in the morning. We had some kind of eerie experiences that way.


Being with Danny was kind of a settling experience for me because Danny was very mature and gentle and kind of spiritual. There was a quality about the guys in "Thornhill's band who were close to Gil. They all had this kind of spiritual quality. There were lots of almost religious-sounding theories that these guys were always into. When they were in town, Gil and Billy Exner, the drummer, would talk all night. They were very much into mysticism. In fact, the relationship with Danny and Gil was mystical to begin with.


Gil had known Billy for years apparently, and Billy had been a seaman all his life. He didn't start playing drums until he was about forty, and some place he was in — South Africa or Asia or somewhere — he bought a picture of a man with an Asian face. It was just a beautiful picture: a very serene, wise-looking man with kind of a wispy gray beard. He brought that picture back and gave it to Gil. Well, sometime later, Danny Polo joined the band, and Danny Polo was the absolute spitting image of this picture that Billy had brought back. Man, he looked like a younger version, not that much younger either, because Danny had gray hair and his mustache had turned gray. He was probably in his fifties, but he was just identical to this picture. There were lots of little things like that about those guys that made for a kind of contact between them that was unusual.


The guys in the rhythm section, like Joe Shulman, the bass player, loved Billy — and they just had all these theories about how rhythm should be played and its function in the band. They were very influenced by the Basie rhythm section, where Freddie Green was really the control center of it. Barry Galbraith, guitarist with the Thornhill band, was very much in that mold. He played with the band in a similar way to Freddie, and later on when I got to know Freddie, I realized that there were other similarities in personality, which often happens — that people who are of similar physical structure and similar personality often have the same kind of approach to music. And there will be something recognizable in the ways that they play. There are these basic structural similarities. I was always fascinated with the ways that people's physical presence related to their playing.


A good example was Lester Young, whose music, especially when he was young and playing with the Basie band, had such grace and a flying, soaring quality to what he played. It just came out so effortlessly, and he would stand and look so graceful and hold his horn up, man, he was flying.

Bird, on the other hand, who was very down to earth, had a hard, straight-ahead kind of time. He could swing but it was in another kind of way altogether. Bird would walk on the stand and plant his feet like a tree, you know; he was like rooted to the ground and so he'd play this stuff that was fiery and with that same kind of earthy, basic beat going on. The ways that they held themselves physically related to the ways that they played.


I'll never forget one time I was standing outside Birdland and I turned around and saw Prez's hat kind of sailing up the stairs, you know, a porkpie hat with the big brim, and he'd sail it upstairs . . . effortlessly, man. He floated, you wouldn't see him taking steps, he'd kind of float out of the place and down the street and right behind him a couple of minutes later came Charlie. And Charlie comes stomping up the steps and the whole place rattled — such a total difference in personality.


Several of the musicians in the Thornhill band were drawn to Gil Evans. I think they gravitated toward him because Gil tended to be a philosopher. He adopted attitudes that I think were his associations with, probably, Zen Buddhism. That seemed to be the direction that he was evolving. But his attitudes were very considered and nonjudgmental, and there was always this kind of activity of thinking and theorizing and talking. It was an ongoing thing. So it was a very rewarding experience for everybody to be part of something, and you'd feel like something is happening. Gil was very much the focus of it. He brought that out in other people.


He was a leader in a way, but he refused the conventional roles of leadership, and he was very happy to let Claude be the one who had to deal with an audience and with agents and with the musicians. You know, it suited him just fine that he didn't have to do any of that and he could just concentrate on writing, which of course is a very selfish way to be and he realized that. It's a hell of a lot easier to let somebody else do all the worrying and all the kind of work you don't want to do.


But if you want a band and you want the things that go with having a band — the music — somebody's got to do it. Bands don't just happen. They don't run themselves, and they have to be self-supporting or they can't function.


As a consequence, Gil was a kind of guru to everyone, even though he really refused the role. There are things that happened to me during that period that if Gil had really offered advice, it's quite likely that I would have done things differently. But he didn't, so I went my way. After the fact, sometimes he would get mad at me because of what I did. I'd say that it's too late and I wasn't smart enough to go and undo what I had done.


For instance, at one point all of us, even though we were writing for Thornhill, needed to write for other bands to make money. And George Russell, he was always looking for other bands to write for, and Johnny Carisi, you know, we had to do it. One time I got an offer to write some stuff for Herbie Fields, a tune that he wanted that was a vocal for the girl singer. Herbie had a band that was kind of a stomping band. There were a couple of bands like that. I always liked them but I never really thought for myself that I had a feeling for writing for them. I was always trying for orchestral things, the interrelation of parts and counterpoints and all that kind of stuff, and these kinds of bands didn't function well in that kind of situation. These were ensemble bands, and that's what you should write for them.


Well, I did the best I could on this thing and brought it into the rehearsal and they liked it and it worked out all right, but Herbie wanted me to change the ending. Well, I was kind of stunned, not because I felt that it had been written in stone and that it couldn't be changed, it was because I couldn't change it. I didn't know what to do. I had done what I could do, and this was again my own limitations. So without saying anything to him, I collected the music and left. I'll never forget the look of astonishment on Herbie's face and on the musicians, like, "What happened?"


I went back and told Gil what had happened, and, you know, I was kind of being a little smart-ass about it I guess, like wanting somebody to give me a pat on the back or something, and he was furious with me. Well, I agreed with him, and I learned a little bit about being able to swallow false pride or to be able to overcome my own blustering, because I think we usually bluster, do dumb things in life, because of our basic inability to know the right way to do it. You make the worst mistakes trying to cover up what you're trying to hide. In this case, I was trying to cover up the fact that I didn't know what the hell to do, and I made a bunch of people unhappy. I really hurt Herbie's feelings. I never meant to do it and I didn't know how to undo it.


Gil, instead of offering any advice at all, was mad at me. That was no help. I really needed some direction. Somebody had to tell me because I didn't know how to deal with people. It was hard to get along because I've always, with my quick temper . . . things would erupt out of my mouth that were not what I wanted to say but then the damage would be done and I didn't know how to undo it. That led to a lot of personal trouble for me in dealing with people. I am embarrassed to this day to have hurt Herbie Fields' feelings when he had nothing to do with it. It was my inability to be able to do what he wanted with the arrangement. That was life. That was just one example.”






Sunday, May 5, 2024

A Light in the Darkness: The Music and Life of Joaquín Rodrigo

 


‘A Light in the Darkness’ Review: The Song of Joaquín Rodrigo

Though seductive and beautiful in itself, the composer’s work reached new listeners with the help of Miles Davis.

By 

Tim Page

May 3, 2024 11:28 am ET


A Light in the Darkness: The Music and Life of Joaquín Rodrigo

By Javier Suárez-Pajares and Walter Aaron Clark

W. W. Norton & Company

512 pages

Several mid-20th-century composers, though prolific, are remembered mostly for a single piece of music. Think of Carl Orff and his “Carmina Burana” or Ferde Grofé’s “Grand Canyon Suite.” And, certainly, think of the Spanish composer Joaquín Rodrigo (1901-99) and his enduringly popular work for guitar and orchestra, “Concierto de Aranjuez.”

Rodrigo wrote a lot of music in his 98 years. He created choral pieces, songs, works for large orchestra and concertos of various size for violin, cello, harp, flute and piano. (Rodrigo’s own principal instrument was the piano, by the way: He was never more than a passable guitarist.) Now two far-flung professors of musicology—Javier Suárez-Pajares at the Complutense University of Madrid and Walter Aaron Clark at the University of California, Riverside—have collaborated on the first major biography of the composer in English.

“A Light in the Darkness: The Music and Life of Joaquín Rodrigo” is more successful as a thorough and thoughtful chronicle of the composer’s work than as an engrossing tale. Recent musical biographies of Sibelius, Barber and Vaughan Williams, among others, have separated person from production, offering a chapter of life story followed by a chapter devoted to the works from the period, a helpful sort of division that offers a double path for the general reader.

In “A Light in the Darkness,” however, a paragraph or a page may be devoted to Rodrigo’s life, and then there may be long passages of musical analysis, some of it quite technical. The book is all well worth reading—there has never been and may never be another English-language book that tells us so much about the composer—but readers who are not adept at score reading may find themselves skimming here and there to catch up with the narrative.

The story is remarkable. Rodrigo was born in Sagunto, a city on the eastern shore of Spain, just outside the city of Valencia. He lost his sight almost entirely after a case of diphtheria when he was 3 years old, although he was able to distinguish light from darkness and recognize the presence of large objects until he was in his 40s. According to the authors, “being blind affected every aspect of Rodrigo’s life and brought him closer to music through an acute aural sense.” He learned to read and write music through an elaborate system based on Braille, one that arranged the raised-dots matrix into 256 encodings instead of the now standard 64.

He moved to Paris to study with Paul Dukas—another fine composer remembered almost entirely for one piece, “The Sorcerer’s Apprentice”—and published the “Suite para piano” in 1923. The authors consider the suite “an auspicious and somewhat surprising debut” from the 22-year-old man and note that the movements “already bear the stamp of Rodrigo’s distinctive musical personality, as well as a non-Spanish character that might perplex those familiar only with his more popular works.” In the next several years, he moved back and forth between Spain and France, but the best-known evocation of Spain in the 20th century was written entirely in Paris.

Messrs. Suárez-Pajares and Clark rightly devote a long chapter to the “Concierto de Aranjuez,” which they call “the key with which Rodrigo opened the door to the history of music and walked through it.” It was not the first concerto for guitar and orchestra: Arrangements of works for lute and mandolin by Boccherini and Vivaldi had preceded it. But those works were played with small ensembles. Rodrigo worried that a full modern orchestra would drown out the soloist.

A paragraph from the program notes Rodrigo wrote for the first performance—on Nov. 9, 1940, in Barcelona—sums up his approach: “It would be unfair to ask that this concerto be powerful, and in vain would great sonorities be expected of it; that would be the same as falsifying its conception and bastardizing the instrument made of subtle vagueness. Its strength has been sought in its lightness and in the intensity of the contrasts.”

Mostly cheerful, always tuneful, the “Concierto” played off the sound of the full orchestra with the softer tones of a guitar, largely by couching the music in a sort of call-and-response dialogue. It was an immediate hit with guitarists. Yet the instrument was nowhere near as popular then as it is today—indeed, the Juilliard School had no guitar faculty until the 1980s—and it took an ingenious American jazz musician to make Rodrigo’s music famous through the world.

In 1959 the trumpeter Miles Davis attended a program of flamenco in New York. He was captivated by what he heard and bought all the albums of contemporary Spanish music that he could find. A friend then passed along the only recording of the “Concierto” to Davis, who was enraptured by its beauty. His favored arranger, Gil Evans, later recalled copying the music directly from the record because there was no published score available. By summer 1960, an album titled “Sketches of Spain” was released on Columbia and has never since been out of print. The first and by far the longest track on the record was Davis’s idiosyncratic vamp on the central Adagio from the “Concierto.”

Rodrigo had mixed feelings about such an adaptation and the forms the concerto eventually took after becoming so popular. So, too, do the authors. The original work “was a challenge to compose and a singular achievement, which attained renown in the halls of symphonic music for which it had been conceived,” they write. Still, “after becoming a widely recognized symbol of what was ‘Spanish,’ it ended up as a conventional musical ditty to sell luxury items like cars or perfumes and used in many film scores.”

True enough. Yet the unadorned “Concierto de Aranjuez” maintains its own distinctive poetry and power. May “A Light in the Darkness” lead new listeners to Rodrigo’s music and life.




Monday, November 20, 2023

Kenny Burrell: The Making of the Guitar Forms Album By Steve Siegel

 © Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


“ Burrell is on hundreds of records, many of which are among the more famous jazz sessions of the LP era, yet he has never secured the popularity which a guitarist might have expected in a period when its practitioners became as important as saxophonists and pianists. He grew up in Detroit and worked there until a tour with Oscar Peterson minded him to look further afield, and he moved to New York in 1956. His Christian-derived style helped get him a job with Benny Goodman, but thereafter he played in settings which were in the heartland of hard bop, for Prestige, Blue Note and New Jazz. Less a sideman and more a partner with several small-group leaders - especially Jimmy Smith, who was a favourite collaborator - Burrell's easy going manner fits so snugly and accommodatingly into any jazz groove that he can almost disappear in a band situation, but his solos and rhythm parts are bluesily effective whatever the prevailing conditions. Gil Evans arranged Guitar Forms for him at Verve, which is perhaps the closest Burrell has ever been to a big-time date, but earlier or later records alike are highly enjoyable and only occasionally slip towards noodling.”

  • Richard Cook’s Jazz Encyclopedia

With previous features on pianist Wade Legge, the Great Day in Harlem Photograph “Mystery Man” - William J. Crump, drummer Frankie Dunlop, vocalist Jimmy Rushing, critic and author Nat Hentoff, Jazz Party: A Great Night In Manhattan featuring the Miles Davis Sextet, the Duke Ellington Orchestra, the September 9, 1958 fest that Columbia Records put on at the Plaza Hotel for its executives and guests, vocalist Ed Reed, Dupree Bolton, Helen Merrill, Sonny Clark and Herbie Nichols, Steve Siegel has assumed the role of “unofficial” staff writer for JazzProfiles.

© -Steve Siegel copyright protected; all rights reserved; used with the author’s permission.

“The guitar as a lead or soloing instrument was late to the jazz party.  In the early days of jazz, you might have found a guitar in a big band, such as Count Basie's use of Freddy Green on rhythm guitar. Finally, in the late 1930s, Charlie Christian liberated the instrument and showed its potential as a lead instrument. But following Christian’s early passing in 1942, not much occurred to further the instrument's reputation until the early 1950s.

 It wasn't until 1953 that a major jazz label recorded a guitarist as a group leader and featured his name on the album cover (Blue Note’s recording of Sal Salvatore, followed in 1954 by one of Tal Farlow). In fact, looking at the classic instrumentation of a jazz combo as it exists today, since the early 1950 the only other instruments beyond the guitar to integrate into the fabric of the jazz combo as a solo instrument were the soprano saxophone and the bass clarinet (originally popularized by Sidney Bechet (reintroduced by Steve Lacy and John Coltrane) and Eric Dolphy respectively).

Guitarist Kenny Burrell arrived in New York City in 1956, in the midst of the great diaspora of jazz musicians who grew up in the greater Detroit area. But unlike the others who left Detroit to test themselves in the shark-infested waters of the many thriving jazz clubs and recording studios of the world's mecca of jazz, Burrell arrived with a rather unusual possession - a four-year baccalaureate degree in music from Wayne State University.

In the world of New York City jazz, circa 1956, a college degree in music signified that the holder of said degree might have merely wasted four years that they could have spent woodshedding in those clubs - learning the ins and outs of jazz from the “street professors” who invented the curriculum of bebop and hard bop. But before entering college, Burrell had already gone to “graduate school” guesting in “professor” Dizzy Gillespie's big band. This combination of great natural ability on the instrument, a broad exposure to the “legitimate” world of music (there were no collegiate jazz programs in universities in the early 1950s) and working within a world class jazz organization had more than prepared Burrell who, along with his friend and fellow Detroit native, pianist Tommy Flanagan*, arrived in New York in early 1956 as a fully formed musician and almost immediately integrated himself into the jazz scene.

Though Burrell was profoundly talented on his instrument, it did not hurt that compared to the large pool of talented players on other traditional instruments used to produce jazz, there was, in 1956, few guitarists who possessed Burrell's combination of total mastery of his instrument, crack reading skills and the ability to play in most of the styles of jazz, popular and even classical music that a record producer or a group leader in a club might ask for. With the exception of Burrell, in 1956 the future wave of modernist jazz guitarists had not yet arrived in NYC. Jim Hall, Joe Pass and Barney Kessel were on the West Coast. Wes Montgomery was still in Indianapolis and Grant Green was not to arrive in NYC until 1960.

The track was wide open and Burrell was soon recommended to Blue Note Records major-domo Alfred Lion as well as to Prestige Records Bob Weinstock – the two biggest jazz labels of the day on the East Coast.

Between March 12 and May 30, 1956, Burrell led three sessions for Blue Note – material that would form his first two albums as a leader. One week later, on June 6-7, he entered the studio for Norman Granz's Clef label and recorded tracks with Billie Holiday that would form the better part of her Lady Sings the Blues albuma rather auspicious introduction for the 25-year-old Burrell.

From 1956 until the Guitar Forms album in 1965, Burrell released 15 albums on eight different labels as a leader or co-leader, nine of which were for Prestige and Blue Note, as well as appearing on hundreds of other sessions as a sideman. 

Eventually, musicians can reach a career crossroads. Following 1963's critically acclaimed Blue Note release, Midnight Blue (Burrell was not to record again for Blue Note for 22 years), Burrell returned to Prestige where his soulful and smooth flowing style appeared to the label to be a perfect match for the commercially oriented emerging soul jazz and bossa nova styles. Burrell’s record sales might have been satisfactory but critical reception was rather tepid with Burrell seemingly repeating himself through no fault of his own. The labels and his producers knew what they wanted and Burrell, throughout his long career, could always deliver a credible performance regardless of the material he was given or the musical style he was asked to work within.

In time, the rewards of being such a musical chameleon and fitting into the musical sphere of others such as session leaders or producers, can weigh on a musician. The public who purchased your last recording can be put off if your next effort deviates from the feel of the one that preceded it. The musicians’ version of the “scales of justice'' with financial rewards on one side and personal aesthetics on the other, may get out of balance. At this point the musician might seek out a label and producer who might allow them to go their own way – or at least have more input into the aesthetic side of the jazz art/profit equation.

By 1964, Burrell was ready to go his own way. As he related to Gil Evans' biographer Larry Hickok:

 I just personally felt I wasn't growing fast enough. I also felt and I still feel that if I had stayed in the studios my career really would not have continued for very long.

Burrell was now looking to do a concept album drawing on multiple sources for his material - an approach that he felt would finally allow him to draw upon all aspects of his talents on his instrument.

In the summer of 1963 Burrell had worked with Verve Records, receiving co-billing with Jimmy Smith on the Creed Taylor-produced album, Blue Bash. Previous to Blue Bash, he had occasionally worked with Taylor who now approached him with a proposal that Burrell work with him to do the type of album that Guitar Forms ultimately turned out to be.

Burrell: 

I worked with him (Taylor) a lot, doing a variety of things in the pop world and also working with some people from Brazil. So, I did a lot of different types of playing which he was aware of, and one day he approached me and said ‘you do all these different things on the guitar, would you like to do an album showcasing all of these aspects of your playing?’ And I said, yes, of course I would. I wanted to have a variety of material based on quality. After that I started to visualize what would be the best setting for this production and for the large ensembles. I thought about Gil Evans, because I really admired his work and I had worked with him in his own group… I wanted to work on it with somebody who was very adaptable and not afraid to tackle said work and was free spirited and that for me happened to be Gil Evans

Moore, Samuel: Interview of Burrell for Guitar International in 2013. 

Taylor was finishing up his work producing Evans’ newest Verve album, The Individualism of Gil Evans (with Burrell on guitar) and was well aware of Evans' reputation as a slow and deliberate arranger who, though producing unique and innovative charts, could slow down production and cause budget overrides. But despite some trepidation, Taylor felt comfortable that, despite the costs, Evans could provide charts that would support his and Burrell’s vision.

So, the impressive trio of Burrell, Evans and Taylor were all on-board. Most importantly they were in agreement on the concept and had a collective understanding of musical expectations for the outcome of the album.

Evans began work on the five charts that he was contracted to provide and as expected, his work pace was very deliberate. But Burrell was unfazed:

My position was I didn’t care how long it took because I could see him maybe once a week or every two weeks and I knew he was working. Hey, when it’s done it’s going to be great and it was.

The recording stretched over three sessions, from December 1964 to April 1965 at the Van Gelder Studio in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. In addition to Burrell, a total of 17 musicians were involved in the project; 11 of whom had appeared on the Individualism sessions, with some of the musicians having also appeared on one or more of the Columbia Records Miles Davis/Gil Evans trilogies of the late 1950s, early 1960s.

With Taylor producing, Evans arranging and a cadre of Evans' alumni in the orchestra, Burrell must have entered the project with high expectations - confident that the pieces were in place to produce his visionary album.

Writing credits spanned almost 50 years and include Elvin Jones, Cyril Scott, Alec Wilder, Harold Arlen, Joe Benjamin (the bassist on the album), George Gershwin and two selections written by Burrell.

The extent of styles included modern jazz, folk, classical and bossa nova (an idiom found frequently on mid-1960s jazz albums). The album had, as Ferdinand “Jelly Roll” Morton once put it, a definite “Spanish tinge.” 

All of this came together successfully because of the remarkable arranging skills of Gil Evans and the mastery of Burrell combined with the sensitivity and musical flexibility of the “A list” players. Evans' orchestra featured the usual big band/jazz orchestra instrumentation augmented by English horns, French horns, a bass clarinet, a tuba, flutes, a bassoon and an oboe.

It would be quite possible for an album with such musical reach to sound disjointed or for the orchestra to overpower the gentle sounds of Burrell's guitar. There are relatively few classical music concertos written for the guitar for the same reason that the guitar has never become an essential instrument in jazz big bands/ orchestras – the difficulty of the instrument being heard, even when electrified, limits its role. But after his brilliant work of integrating a similar orchestral sound with the often soft, muted sound of Davis' trumpet and flugelhorn, Evans was now an acknowledged master of the nuances of arranging such a combination. He did this through utilizing unique tonal variations and varying the dynamics of sound between sections of the orchestra and even within those sections. 

So just like the muted, ethereal sounds of Davis' horns, the guitar of Burrell does not compete with but integrates into the swirling sounds of the orchestra.

Credit Rudy van Gelder for his usual fine job of creating an authentic soundstage - spotlighting Burrell when he solos over the orchestra and controlling the relative dynamics of instruments through microphone placement and his sound board's dials and sliders.

Of the nine selections that made it to the album, one was a solo rendition of an excerpt from George Gershwin's, Prelude #2, three were small group blues-oriented pieces by the quintet of Burrell, Roger Kellaway, Joe Benjamin, Grady Tate and Willie Rodriguez. The remaining five pieces were all arranged by Evans for the small group and orchestra.

Perhaps Evans' best work on the album is a remarkable arrangement of a classical piece, Lotus Land, written in 1905 by the British composer Cyril Scott (1879-1970).

Scott has been referred to by some as the “English Debussy" as well as “The Father of Modern British Music.” Interestingly, the piece has quite an Eastern feel to it. Scott, who was a true polymath, had studied Eastern philosophy and the piece has been described as containing “Orientalist musical techniques common to modernist composers representing the exotic East.”

Lotus Land is defined in Webster's as “An idyllic place of contentment and ease.” Scott’s own piano renditions of the piece indicates that perhaps it was written as musical impressionism. Though Lotus Land, as Evans views it, is not as idyllic a place as Scott might have viewed it. As the nine-minute plus piece moves from Burrell's soothing predominantly single note opening lines and the orchestra joins in, Benjamin on bass and Tate on drums lay down a rather militaristic beat which does seem to propel the stately melody line forward into the swirling orchestral parts.

Music writers and critics who have studied the Evans/Burrell treatment of the piece have perceived similarities to Evans' arrangements for Miles Davis on the Sketches of Spain album - primarily heard through the English horn/guitar interaction. The similarities are confirmed by Burrell:

Well, I kind of had that background in mind when I thought about doing that song, because I very much liked what he had done with Miles Davis…My approach to the piece was certainly different than one might think because it was by an English composer, about an oriental place and it’s very interesting how it all came together, but that’s what I was feeling as I heard it. (Moore)




Another strong piece with a Spanish flavor is Burrell's composition “Loie”, written for his then wife, Delores. The song first appeared on Ike Quebec's 1962 album Bossa Nova Soul with Burrell on guitar. 

On this version, forward momentum is supplied by Grady Tate’s ostinato beat. It features a series of short solos by Burrell punctuated by one of Davis' favorite devices of a tutti where the full orchestra provides a jarring contrast to the serenity of Burrell's guitar, with a series of blasts of color followed by another short calming solo from Burrell. 

The interplay of Andy Fitzgerald’s English horn with Burrell's guitar has, as we hear on “Lotus Land,” a Concerto de Aranjuez feel.

Whereas Burrell composed “Loie” in the early 1960s, “Greensleeves” has a history dating back to 1580. A version of it has been played on almost every instrument ever invented and presumably on a few that have become extinct. Yet Gil Evans found a way to freshen the arrangement that persuaded the 1966 Grammy panel to nominate the old war horse (the song…not Evans) for the Grammy Award in the category of “Best Arrangement Accompanying a Vocalist or Instrumentalist.” 

Burrell truly showed his esoteric taste in music by including Alec Wilder's “Moon and Sand” on the album – a song written in 1941 when he and co-writer Mort Palitz were “noodling" on violin and piano respectively with Wilder writing down the melody line and lyricist William Engvick adding the words. The song had been introduced by Xavier Cugat and his Waldorf Astoria Orchestra. The piece was rather obscure until the 1960s. Until then, if it was performed at all, it was probably in the context of dance or cabaret music and was generally neglected by jazz musicians. 

The inclusion on Guitar Forms again shows both Evans' and Burrell's ability to see very deeply into a composition and extract something unique. In part, because of the song’s exposure on Guitar Forms, versions of the song began appearing on albums by both jazz singers and pianists.

Conclusion:

 In 1964-65 when Burrell decided that he needed to make a powerful musical statement, there were major changes happening in the music world that ultimately had a negative impact on the recording opportunities and distribution of jazz records. The revitalization of rock and roll was underway with theBritish Invasion” led by the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. Albums by the top rock groups could sell more units in a week than even well received jazz albums could during the record’s entire life cycle. The major labels began to pare down their jazz divisions and might only be interested in jazz to the extent that they could find a crossover hit along the lines of Lee Morgan's The Sidewinder.  The small independent jazz labels were being acquired by larger companies for their back catalogs and in many cases, they became reissue-only labels.

Against this backdrop in 1965, Burrell had a very small window of opportunity to make his signature jazz album. Verve Records, under head producer Creed Taylor, was still committed to making quality jazz records but was moving toward a more slick, commercial type of jazz such as the fusion of light jazz with bossa nova. By 1967, Taylor had left Verve and formed CTI Records. From 1964 on, Verve’s parent company MGM, turned its attention to signing rock artists. 

Meanwhile, Evans was phasing out his work in arranging albums for other artists (Miles Davis excluded) to concentrate on his own orchestral recordings. However, for a short while, the stars were in alignment for Burrell and a very narrow window of opportunity allowed Guitar Forms to be made.

At the 1966 Grammy Awards, Guitar Forms was nominated for the “Grammy Award for Best Instrumental Jazz Performance – Large Group or Soloist with Large Group,” for “Best Album Cover – Photography,” and Gil Evans was nominated for “Best Arrangement Accompanying a Vocalist or Instrumentalist” for “Greensleeves.”

In summary, Burrell offers this postscript:

I just looked at the music and did my best to play it right. But, in this case, it (Guitar Forms) was tailor made for certain kinds of guitar playing. It wasn’t just straight ahead jazz with a theme, improvisation and band background or band soli, these were pieces that were pretty well integrated with the guitar and the orchestra combined. 

Not every jazz artist is provided the support and guidance to allow them to produce a “signature” album. Even when a record producer provides an artist with the opportunity, such as Creed Taylor did with Burrell, corporate executives may impose budgetary constraints, or request changes in personnel and/or repertoire in order to commercialize the product to penetrate multiple market segments and bring in more profits. 

Even if a session has the full support at all levels of the company and the session is deemed successful, there is no guarantee that the tapes won't be shelved. Reasons include such occurrences as the company recording too much “product" from an artist and can’t release it all. Occasionally, it was simply that a session tape and notes were literally misplaced and lost to time, often to be discovered in the master tape vault decades later – Blue Note Records, when owned by Alfred Lion and Francis Wolff, being a prime example of both scenarios occurring. 

We are all very fortunate that Guitar Forms managed to negotiate all of these possible obstacles to produce what is perhaps the best guitar with orchestra jazz album ever recorded.”

*To some ears, there seems to have been a bit of musical cross-pollinated between Burrell and Flanagan. Ironically, I once heard Burrell be referred to as the “Tommy Flanagan of the Guitar” and on another occasion, Flanagan as the “Kenny Burrell of the piano”.