Friday, June 5, 2020

How The Rhythm Section Got Its Name - Jerry Coker - Part 1, Drums

© Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


Since 1900, when jazz -a uniquely American music form - began to evolve, much of its allure and artistic growth has depended on the creative freedom and expressive force that improvisation allows its performers.

Jerry Coker, himself a teacher, composer/arranger, and noted saxophonist, has written How To Listen To Jazz to fill the need for a layman's guide to understanding improvisation and its importance in the development of this artistically rich yet complex music form. Without relying on overly technical language or terms, Jerry Coker Shows how you can become a knowledgeable jazz listener-whether you are an aspiring musician, student, jazz aficionado, or new listener. In addition to looking at the structure of jazz and explaining what qualities to look for in a piece, the author provides a complete chronology of the growth of jazz, from its beginnings in the rags of Scott Joplin, the New Orleans style of the 1920s made famous by Bessie Smith, Bix Beiderbecke and Louis Armstrong, the Swing Era with Benny Goodman, and Art Tatum, Be-Bop, post Be-Bop, to the greats of Modern Jazz, including Miles Davis, Herbie Hancock, Freddie Hubbard, and Wes Montgomery.

Also including a list of suggested recordings, a section on the improvised solo, and a complete glossary of jazz terms, How To Listen To Jazz offers you a complete introduction to the entire jazz experience... the music and those who make it.

The following excerpt forms Chapter 3 of this excellent book which every Jazz fan should have along with Ted Gioia’s treatment of How to Listen to Jazz to help enhance your appreciation of the music. 

The Rhythm Section 

The term rhythm section probably began to be used in the early days of the big jazz bands (1925-1930), when one spoke of the trumpet section, the trombone section, or the saxophone section, in other words, when there was, for the first time in jazz, multiplicity of the trumpet, trombone, and saxophone (or clarinet). In prior times, as in the New Orleans style (1890-1925), such instruments seldom appeared in numbers greater than one. But when one spoke of the remaining instruments of the big band, like the piano, guitar, bass, and drums, the term rhythm section was used, lumping together four rather dissimilar instruments that shared the common function of maintaining the pulse or beat for some eight to thirteen wind instruments, in ensemble and during solos. This is an oversimplification, of course, as their duties also included supplying chords, bass lines, solos, rhythmic settings, and even melodies. But jazz is a music "with the big beat" or an emphasized pulse, and the piano, guitar, bass, and drums are especially suited to carrying that beat.

It is probably true, however, that the name rhythm section is, when applied to today's jazz, inaccurate and degrading. The term reduces those four marvelous instruments to the function of a bass drum player in a marching band or a drone in Eastern music. We surely wouldn't refer to the Oscar Peterson Trio or the Bill Evans Trio (each made up of piano, bass, and drums) as a rhythm section, as each of these trios is an entire group, one that does not rely on wind instruments to carry melody, harmony, arrangement, or solos.

Most music of the Western world will be found to have three main structural elements: bass line, chords, and melody. In the Baroque trio of the seventeenth century, for example, the bass line was played by a viola da gamba, the chords by a harpsichord, and the melody by a wind instrument (flute, recorder, etc.) or perhaps a violin. A group of instruments like piano, guitar, bass, and drums can easily carry the three structural elements of bass line, chords, and melody (indeed all three elements could be carried by piano or guitar alone), plus the added rhythmic dimension made possible by the inclusion of drums. Doubtless, we will continue to refer to them as a rhythm section for some time, but we mustn't think of that section as existing merely to supply a "big beat."

Such misconceptions have even found their way into the minds of the musicians themselves. For example, an arranger is subject to scoring all the horn parts first, leaving the rhythm section parts for the last, sometimes not even supplying written parts for them, an omission he could hardly consider in the case of, say, the lead trumpet part. For another example, the pecking order for improvised solos in sessions and in recordings will usually direct that all the wind instruments play their solos first, giving the last (and usually shorter) solos to the members of the rhythm section, when some of their solo drive has been dampened or used up accompanying long solos by the wind instruments. Rhythm section players, then, are understandably reluctant to come to a jam session and receive more punishment, especially if there are too many horn players (as, remember, the rhythm section plays virtually all the time, regardless of who is soloing). Still another example of warped values is evident in some horn players who won't learn the chord progressions by hard work and study, but expect the guitarist, pianist, and bass player to know the progressions and supply them endlessly while the horn player tries to find his notes by ear and guesswork. It would be helpful to take a closer look at each of the instruments of the rhythm section and how they function in the jazz group.

DRUMS

It has often been stated by jazz historians that jazz rhythms have their origins in the music of West Africa. No doubt there is some truth in this, but it would be a mistake to think that jazz rhythms and West African rhythms are very much alike. The music of West Africa is far more sophisticated and complex by comparison and well beyond the grasp of jazz drummers, even black drummers, as their color and ancestry cannot overcome several centuries of detachment from African culture. Even the music played at Congo Square in New Orleans by the blacks who gathered there in the late nineteenth century was already a diluted form of West African music, and the unusual rhythm instruments used there were largely at variance with the instruments of West Africa. Whatever similarities did exist during the spawning of jazz, soon faded away, replaced by a forerunner of the modern drum set (bass drum, snare drum, tom-toms, and cymbals). One of the earliest jazz drummers was Baby Dodds, but except for very small details, we can hardly relate his style to the West African style. In fact, we'd have an easier time proving that jazz elements like improvisation, call and response patterns, the blues style, jazz intonation, and jazz phrasing are derived from West African culture. About all that remains of African drumming in jazz (recent efforts to rediscover African drumming notwithstanding) is the general emphasis on rhythm and a few polymetric aspects.[Polymetric means the playing of one time signature against another.]

Early jazz drummers (1900-1930) were not very prominent or adventurous, tending to play relatively simple time-keeping figures and seldom soloing. Ironically, white drummer Gene Krupa probably did more to liberate the drummer from purely time-keeping functions than any drummer before him. This can be easily recognized by comparing Krupa's recordings (with Benny Goodman in the late thirties) with previous drummers. He is significantly prominent and solos often in those recordings. There were other important drummers in Krupa's time, like Sonny Greer (with Duke Ellington) and Cozy Cole, but Krupa's extraversion and flashiness were needed to bring the drums out of the purely supporting role. He forced you to listen to the drummer. He played a loud, heavy pulse with his bass drum, pounded out a quasi-jungle style on tom-toms (which was purely illusory and bore little resemblance to West African drumming), participated heavily on the overall sound of the ensemble, and played virtuoso, dramatic solos.

Joe Jones was another important drummer, also active in the late thirties, with the Count Basie Orchestra. Rather than focusing on a solo style, as Krupa did, Jones mastered the rhythm-section function of the drummer, supplying a solid, steady beat and blending with the other members of that great rhythm section (Basie on piano, Freddie Green on guitar and Walter Page on bass).

A few years later, in the early forties, the bebop style was born. As it was a very different style from the music of the Swing Era (1930-1940), it required a vastly different approach to playing drums, which was first supplied by Kenny Clarke. Clarke did away with the bass drum pulse, keeping time on the cymbals instead, using the bass drum only for explosive accents or for echoing improvised figures played on the snare drum. The pulse was infinitely more subtle than Krupa's, replacing the bass drum's "thump-thump-thump-thump" with a "ding, ding-a., ding, ding-a" on a very large cymbal (italics are used to show accents here).

Another change took place in the pulse feeling: whereas previous drummers either accented all four beats of a measure (as in 4/4 time) or accented the first and third beats, Clarke and other bop drummers switched the accents to the second and fourth beats, playing them on the sock cymbals (two cymbals that come together, operated by the foot) in a figure and sound that might be described as "(rest), chick, (rest), chick." Note that both the sock cymbal figure and the large (ride) cymbal figure played by Clarke have accents on the second and fourth beats and that neither figure is merely a thumping, unadorned pulse beat. The sock cymbal figure omits the first and third beats altogether and the ride cymbal figure adds sound between the beats, represented here by the "a" of "ding-a" These changes made quite a difference in the overall sound of drummers, the pulse, and the rhythm section.

Another innovation of the Bebop Era (chiefly 1945-50) was the new relationship between drummer and ensemble, particularly in the big bands. In the late forties, Woody Herman recorded "The Goof And I," in which drummer Don Lamond was very prominent, not as a soloist but as a sort of rhythmic coach to the entire ensemble. Lamond emphasized the ensemble's heavier accents, duplicating them on his bass drum, sometimes on snare drum or cymbals as well. This is not to be confused with the thumping pulse-beat played by Krupa in an earlier time. In Lamond's playing the bass drum was only supporting the band's accents, which are much less frequent than the pulse. His bass drum sound was explosively loud by contrast with the beats in which he wasn't using the bass drum at all. Lamond also played loud figures just prior to ensemble entrances and accents that made it easier for the ensemble to feel their rhythmic figures accurately. Several new terms were coined in this period; (1) bomb, a name for the explosive accents; (2) set-up, a figure that preceded an ensemble entrance and made that entrance more positive and accurate; and (3) fill, material improvised by the drummer in otherwise empty places, to take up the slack.

During and after the Be-Bop Era, the drums became an instrument for sizzling virtuosos, especially in the hands of Max Roach, whose phenomenal technique was baffling to the drummers of the time. Roach was particularly dazzling both as a soloist and as a drummer who could drive a group through some of the fastest tempos ever attempted by a jazz group. Most of his career was spent playing in the greatest of the small groups of that period, with Charles Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Sonny Rollins, and the Max Roach-Clifford Brown Quintet. Roach dwelt on polymetric figures and on rhythmic form (variations on rhythmic motives). [Sometimes the rhythmic motives used by Roach were actually the rhythms of a known melody. By using the various components of his drum set, he even implies the contours of the melody.]

In the early fifties, while the Max Roach-Clifford Brown Quintet was in full bloom, a group in Detroit let by Barry Harris was featuring a new drummer on the rise, Elvin Jones, who later joined the John Coltrane Quartet and made some of the most significant recordings of the late fifties and early sixties with this group, including the album A Love Supreme. Jones perfectly complemented the dynamic Coltrane style. Far from merely keeping time for the group, Jones was a fully participating member, coinciding with and echoing every important rhythmic nuance of both the ensemble and the solos. It was a boiling, brewing, conversational style that didn't wait for empty spots to be filled.

About this time musicians and critics were beginning to refer to a new rhythmic concept, called the implied beat, in which it was no longer necessary for the rhythm section, particularly the drummer, to produce timekeeping figures. Instead, as long as they were all feeling the pulse together (and they were), it was no longer necessary to play the pulse
itself, as it would be apparent anyway in everything they chose to play. In other words, they didn't ignore the pulse, as everything was related to and measured by that pulse, but they simply didn't need to thump it out anymore. The pulse would be implied by what they did play. This was new to jazz, yet it had existed in many other forms of music for centuries. Thus we seem now to have arrived at a point about 180 degrees from where we started our discussion, at a stage where pulse-keeping was deemed redundant.

Compared to singers and to players of wind instruments and strings, a drummer plays an instrument that is almost without the capability of being tonal or melodic. Early drummers in jazz, when they tightened or loosened the heads on their drums, doubtlessly were more attentive to the tone quality than to the actual pitch of each of the drums. And the drummer is not likely to change the tuning of the drums to suit the key of each selection played. Furthermore, the pitches produced by drums do not sustain, nor are they Very distinct vibrationally or a high enough range to be perceived as specific pitches by many listeners. Even the cymbals, for all their beautiful ringing, are almost indistinct in terms of specific pitches heard by the average listener. Finally, the cymbals and drums used in jazz are, under normal circumstances, not built for the spontaneous tuning to specific pitches during the performance used with the timpani (which can be spontaneously tuned, owing to a foot-pedal mechanism) or the tabla (of India, tuned by pressing on the bottom head of the drum with the hand that is not beating the rhythm). Drummers like Art Blakey partially solved the problem by pressing the top head of the drum with an elbow, thereby raising and lowering the pitch at will. This limited solution, however, could not, in itself, push the drum style much closer to a recognizable melody.

If drums are relatively unmelodic, compared to wind and string instruments, they are even less capable of producing harmony. Thanks to these limitations, drummers often acquire, by experience, a defensive attitude about studying music, formally. Melody and harmony reign supreme in music classes (too much so, in fact), but the members of the class who play drums have less opportunity to apply melodic and harmonic principles to their instrument. Application and experience being crucial to the assimilation of such principles, the drummer is often at a disadvantage and called a "slow learner."

The solutions to all these problems are interesting to observe, historically. Krupa was already working on the melodic problem in the thirties, by rapid alternation between the different drums, creating the illusion of counterpoint (simultaneous melodic-rhythmic events, usually in imitation), and by using accessories, like the cowbell or the woodblock, in semi-melodic ways. Drummers of the forties, like Max Roach and Shelly Manne, began tuning their drums to specific pitches to aid the drive toward a more melodic concept. Roach and Mel Lewis did much to aid the element of story-telling form to the drum solo, that is, they repeated rhythmic motives and developed them slowly and completely, like the melodies to familiar songs. Some drummers, like Benny Barth, spent many practice hours drumming the rhythms of hundreds of popular and standard songs, in an effort to be more melodic.

Somewhere along the way, drummers stopped trying to compete melodically with the other instruments. Instead, they developed a pride in percussive melodies, not compared to or in strict imitation of or limited by standard pitch-melody concepts. Listen, for example, to the constantly chattering, conversational style of Elvin Jones, both in soloing and in accompanimental capacities.

Many of the foregoing contributions came together in the drum playing of Tony Williams, in the sixties and into the present, and were developed further by him. Finally, spontaneous tuning of pitches was added (though not in imitation of traditional scales and melodies), chiefly by Billy Cobham, through the use of electronic gadgetry that can alter pitch, quality, and reverberation. A Cobham solo is, by anyone's standards, extremely melodic.

Even the overall image of the drummer's musicianship has increased greatly over the years. In the forties and early fifties, drummers like Tiny Kahn and Louie Bellson were writing choice arrangements and teaching chord progressions to other members of a jam session. In  1958, at the Monterey Jazz Festival, Max Roach electrified the San Francisco Symphony with his performance of a difficult piece by Peter Phillips, written for Roach and the orchestra. By the end of the sixties, Elvin Jones and Tony Williams had become leaders of major jazz combos. In the late sixties, Stan Kenton had two drummers who had switched from wind instruments to drums, Dee Barton and John von Olen. And then there are those, like Stevie Wonder and Billy Cobham, who can perform virtually every task of the well-rounded musician, composing, arranging, playing several instruments, singing, and leading, with success and with perfection. Drummers like Alan Dawson and Max Roach, in addition to being great players, have also become successful as teachers of jazz drums in major colleges and conservatories. 

Another dimension was added to drumming in the late sixties when Miles Davis added a percussionist to his rock-oriented jazz group that recorded albums like In A Silent Way and Bitches Brew. Davis retained the drummer, as well, simply adding Jim Riley or Airto Moreira on miscellaneous percussion instruments too numerous to list fully, but the numbers included strings of bells, Latin American rhythm instruments, and virtually anything that would rattle, scrape, or jingle. The percussionist's music (written) or parts were generally unassigned, leaving to their tasteful discretion to play whatever and whenever they felt the need. Such percussionists add color, texture, and dimension to the overall sound of the group. In a sense, we have returned to percussion instruments like those used in Congo Square, a full 360 degrees of change and development.

To be continued in Part 2 with Bass and Guitar

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Dave Pike Mambo Bounce



Dave Pike on vibes with Tommy Flanagan on piano, George Duvivier on bass and William Correo on drums. See if you can hear the reference to "Twisted" in Dave's solo.

Wednesday, June 3, 2020

Ed Bickert With Paul Desmond & Company LIVE! 1975

Paul Desmond - The Complete 1975 Toronto Recordings- Mosaic Records

© Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


“Beauty is an undefinable thing. Not everyone even hears it but for those that do, it's probably the main reason they really love the music they love. Paul's playing was never about how he could play the saxophone. He had lots of chops but his playing was always about the feeling and the beauty of the music and I believe that this is what makes him one of the greatest players of all time.”
- Don Thompson, double bass, piano, and vibes


“Paul's longtime associate Jim Hall was his guitarist at the Half Note, but Hall was unable to go to Toronto when Desmond accepted a gig there at the club called Bourbon Street. Hall recommended Ed Bickert (1932-2019), often mentioned with Lennie Breau and Sonny Greenwich as among Canada's finest guitarists. Don Thompson was the bass player in Desmond's quartet at Bourbon Street. A pianist, composer and superb bassist, Thompson is also a gifted recording engineer. Every night at Bourbon Street, he taped the Desmond group. He has worked with Breau and Greenwich and says, "I played with all of those great guitarists, but for Paul and his music, Ed Bickert was the perfect fit. It was a match made in heaven." The heavenly match led to Bickert's being the guitarist on the 1974 CTI album PURE DESMOND, produced by John Snyder and recorded in New York in the fall of 1974 with bassist Ron Carter and drummer Connie Kay. Thus, despite the personnel differences, PURE DESMOND was the prototype of what became Desmond's Canadian quartet.


Thompson had an assignment to capture Desmond's quartet lor the A&M Horizon label. A&M issued the resulting album on vinyl, and later on CD, as THE PAUL DESMOND QUARTET LIVE. He recorded Desmond in March of 1975 and again in October and November of that year. Expanding on Bickerl's compatibility with Desmond and on the guitarist's abilities in general, Thompson said, "Ed was famous for knowing all the tunes in all the keys. We had no music and never rehearsed. There were a couple of endings we discussed before going on, and Paul had a funny little cue that he'd play to let us know the next chorus would be stop-lime. Other than that, we'd go on stage, he'd call a tune and the key, and we'd just play. These are possibly the best recordings there are of Ed Bickert.”
- Doug Ramsey, author, Take Five: The Public and Private Lives of Paul Desmond


These excerpts from Doug Ramsey’s booklet notes provide the background for the evolution of Mosaic Records’ latest boxed set - Paul Desmond - The Complete 1975 Toronto Recordings [MD7-269] about which you can locate order information by going here.


Don Thompson, the bassist on these dates who recorded them in performance [Chad Irschich is the Mosaic recording engineer], also provided an overview of these sessions in the booklet that accompanies the set. We wrote to Don and to Michael Cuscuna who produced them along with Don and Chad and requested their permission to reprint Don’s notes on these pages and they graciously gave their approval.


These recordings capture many brilliant performances by Paul less than two years before his passing on May 30, 1977. They are an everlasting testimony to his uniqueness as a musical artist.


“Thompson is now the last survivor of the Paul Desmond Canadian Quartet. In preparation for this Mosaic release, he has restored and remixed his original tapes so they can be heard by Desmond's longtime fans as well as a new generation of listeners. These recordings offer further proof thai the legacies of jazz musicians extend far beyond their mortal lives. They remain with us as long as their music can be heard.”
— Thomas Cunniffe August 2019, Mosaic Set Postscript


 © -Don Thompson/Mosaic Records, copyright protected; all rights reserved; used with the author’s permission.


“Back in the 1970s there was a club in Toronto that would regularly bring in major artists to play a couple of weeks with a local Toronto rhythm section. I was the bass player (sometimes piano player) in one of the two house rhythm sections and I played there many times with such people as Jim Hall, Art Farmer, Milt Jackson, Clark Terry, James Moody and many others. In 1974 I got a call to play there with Paul Desmond.


Paul had always been a favorite of mine. When I was about 15, still in high school, I had a band (alto sax, piano and drums) and we played a lot of the Brubeck hits of the day including BROTHER CAN YOU SPARE A DIME?, A FINE ROMANCE and PENNIES FROM HEAVEN. I wrote out Paul's solos for my alto player who was not an improviser but was a good reader with a pretty sound.


The first jazz concert I ever went to was in 1957 (I was 17) and there were five groups on the program. Stan Getz, Shorty Rogers, George Shearing, Billie Holiday and Dave Brubeck. It was pretty silly having five groups playing about 20 minutes each and the only things I remembered after the concert were Paul's playing and a bongo solo by Armando Peraza who was playing with George Shearing. Paul got to me then as he always has just by playing so pretty and without any show biz jive.


As I understand it, when I got the call in 1974 the Brubeck Band had sort of disbanded a couple of years earlier and Paul had not been playing very much, so he really wasn't that keen on coming to Toronto and working with guys he didn't know. He'd recently done a week in New York with a quartet with Jim Hall and he'd asked Jim if he would come to Toronto for the gig but Jim declined, suggesting he try to get Ed Bickert to play guitar along with me on bass and Terry Clarke on drums. Ed was one of the greatest guitarists in Canada along with Sonny Greenwich and Lenny Breau. All three of them lived in Toronto in the early 1970s and I played with all of them but for Paul and his music Ed Bickert was the perfect fit.


Paul came back to Toronto in March 1975 and this time he asked me to record the gig for a live recording on A&M Horizon. We recorded that gig and another week in October and these CDs are the result of those two weeks. We had no music and never rehearsed but there were a couple of endings we discussed before going on to play. He also had a funny little cue that he'd play to let us know the next chorus would be stop-time. Other than that, we'd just go on stage and he'd call the tunes and the key they'd be in and we'd just play.


Ed was famous for basically knowing all the tunes in all the keys. It was impossible to think of a tune he didn't know and I'd been playing with him for four years so I really knew his harmony. These are possibly the best recordings there are of Ed Bickert. He made quite a few recordings but most of them were either as a sideman or under his own name but with music arranged by someone else, so he was usually reading someone else's chords. Ed had an amazing knowledge and understanding of harmony and with no music to read he was free to play whatever harmonies that came into his mind and all those beautiful chords he played were things that he'd figured out and had been playing since the early 1960s.


The tracks with Rob McConnell came about as a result of Ed's father passing away and Ed having to leave town for a couple of nights to deal with things. Rob had been into the club a couple of times to sit in and he and Paul had become friends so rather than trying to get another guitar player we asked Rob to fill in for Ed for the two nights. Paul and Rob played beautifully together and it often sounds like they'd had a rehearsal but it was the same as it was with Ed. Paul would ask Rob what he felt like playing and Rob would suggest, for example MY FUNNY VALENTINE, then they would play it so beautifully it sounded like they had a worked-out arrangement. All they did, in fact, was listen to and watch one another. Just a glance from Paul and Rob would take over the melody for four or eight bars. Then he'd look over to Paul and Paul would take over the melody and they both knew exactly what to play when the other was playing a solo.


Jerry Fuller was so understated and inconspicuous he was often overlooked, but the fact is his playing was a big part of the success of the whole gig. Jerry was a very schooled musician having studied piano and arranging when he was a student at Westlake in Los Angeles. He was also a very good bass player and he knew all the tunes, too. He had a reputation for shouting the chord changes to a bass player who didn't know a tune they were playing and he was always right. I remember sitting with him on a break one night and a young student drummer came over and asked him what it was like playing with Paul. Jerry thought about it and replied "I try to play everything Paul wants me to play and every now and then I play something I'd like to play." Jerry was known for being a power bebop drummer who's playing came right out of Philly Joe Jones but he'd put all that aside when he was playing with Paul. He always played exactly what the music needed.


For me the gig was a most beautiful experience. The music was all very familiar to me and all I had to do was just listen and try to do what the music asked me to do. Paul gave me a solo on every tune whether I wanted it or not and there were many times I was just playing and hoping I didn't mess up what had been up to then, another perfect take.


Working on this project with recording engineer Chad Irschick was another amazing experience. We'd worked together on the mastering of the JIM HALL LIVE CDs that came out on Artists Share and the GEORGE SHEARING AT HOME CD as well as many of my own projects. He is the best engineer I've ever worked with and he cares about the music as much as any musician I know. He hears every note as though he'd played it himself and uses his knowledge as a musician and all the technology he has to make the music come alive. There were a couple of tapes that were unplayable because of a buzz on the bass track but one of the young tech geniuses in the studio spent quite a few hours on it and got rid of every buzzing bass note giving us some of the best tracks we have.


I do think that Paul was one of the real giants of jazz and this is a chance to hear him playing live, having fun with musicians he really enjoyed playing with. For me, the thing that makes someone a really great musician is not technique. It's not hip-ness (tricky patterns on D minor, playing in odd meters, all the stuff that kids learn in college). It has nothing to do with those kinds of things. Everyone knows Charlie Parker and John Coltrane had chops to burn but that's not what made them great. For me it's the feeling and the beauty in their playing that sets them apart from the rest. It's how I feel when I listen to Bird play OLD FOLKS or when I hear Trane play I WANT TO TALK ABOUT YOU. Beauty is an undefinable thing. Not everyone even hears it but for those that do, it's probably the main reason they really love the music they love. Paul's playing was never about how he could play the saxophone. He had lots of chops but his playing was always about the feeling and the beauty of the music and I believe that this is what makes him one of the greatest players of all time.


I can't think of very many musicians in the history of jazz that would have this kind of continuing popularity 42 years after their passing. He was an honest, pure artist who did it all without any kind of ego or show. I don't think he was ever actually trying to do anything. He just did it the only way he could and I'm truly honored to have been a part of his music.”
— Don Thompson July 2019

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

Portrait of Tracy



Portrait of Tracy" is a composition by bassist Jaco Pastorius. It appears on his landmark self-titled debut album, and is widely recorded as a tribute by bassists such as Joe Ferry, Marcus Miller, Victor Wooten, Brian Bromberg, and others. It is considered by many a bass guitar standard, and is often used as a benchmark for a bassist's abilities. The song is played almost exclusively with natural harmonics, giving it a dreamy, unfamiliar tone for the bass, which is common in Pastorious' Style. The song has been sampled as well, most notably, SWV's "Rain", Cannibal Ox's "Pigeon", Amon Tobin's "Daytrip", Chingy and Tyrese's "Pulling Me Back", Wagon Christ's Mr. Mukatsuku, Steve Spacek's "Hey There"and Hotstylz Faucet.

Lennie Niehaus - 58 Masterpieces



If you want to know what Lennie Niehaus was all about listen to his playing and writing on these tracks on which he appears with the usual west coast jazz suspects.
It's such a shame that too, few Jazz fans know about this stuff.
"Masterpieces" is an understatement as far as I'm concerned.

Lennie Niehaus - A Consummate Pro [1929-2020] R.I.P.

© -  Steven A. Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.

Lennie Niehaus died on May 28, 2020. He would have been 91 years of age on June 1st. The editorial staff at JazzProfiles is re-posting this feature as a tribute to his memory.



For different reasons, the author Max Harrison and the alto saxophonist, composer and arranger, Lennie Niehaus have been people I have admired over the years, so what better way to celebrate them on JazzProfiles than to feature a Marx Harrison article on Lennie Niehaus that was originally published in the March, 1958 edition of Jazz Monthly?

Somewhat ironically, as Ted Gioia points out in his seminal West Coast Jazz: Modern Jazz in California, 1945-1960 [p. 163]:

“Despite the striking virtues of his playing, Niehaus never achieved more than passing notice from the critics. One notable exception, however, was Max Harrison,…, whose insightful essay on Niehaus captures the essential virtues of the altoist’s work ….”


Both Lennie’s plaintive wail on many of the Stan Kenton’s mid-1950s albums such as Back to BalboaCuban Fire and The Stage Door Swings, to my ears the quintessential sound of West Coast Jazz, and Max Harrison’s acerbic wit and unconventional views had a powerful impact on my appreciation of Jazz at a very early [impressionable?] age.

I do disagree with Mr. Harrison on one aspect of Lennie’s career as I happen to very much enjoy Stan Kenton and Lennie‘s playing during his stints with the Kenton Orchestra. However, not to belabor the point, Max and I do agree on the four wonderful recordings that Lennie made for Contemporary records in the 1950s that are the subject of his essay.

I have taken the liberty of augmenting Max’s essay with the addition of Volume 4: The Quintets and Strings [Contemporary C-3510; OJCCD 1858-2] which was not referenced in Max’s essay, as well as, with the inclusion of excerpts from the original Contemporary LP liner notes by John S. Wilson, Arnold Shaw, Lester Koenig, and Barry Ulanov, respectively. Lennie was also very gracious in granting me time to answer a few interview questions about these albums at recent events sponsored by the Los Angeles Jazz Institute at which he appeared.


Individual Voice: Lennie Niehaus - Max Harrison

“It was unfortunate Niehaus first became widely known as a result of the tours he undertook in the mid-1950s with Stan Kenton’s band, for the records he was then producing under his own name made it obvious that he had nothing in common with that master of the unintentionally comic bombast.

The second thing to be learnt from them was that Niehaus had little to learn about playing the alto saxophone. His ease and fluency conveyed a feeling of relaxation and security that is always rare, and his attack and swing were almost equally striking.

But the most notable feature of the twenty-six performances considered here is the consistency of his inventive power in improvisation. He never seems to be at a loss for a good melodic idea, and even though his phrasing is concise and pre-eminently logical, an element of the unexpected is never absent.

Lester Koenig noted: “He is a remarkable alto soloist, with a sense of flowing melodic line, lovely cool tone, and a strong feeling for rhythm. He is a thoughtful and serious musician, who composes in his own style, with definite ideas of where he is going and what he wants to achieve.”


In some ways, Niehaus first LP – Lennie Niehaus Vol. 1 ‘The Quintets’  [Contemporary C-3518; OJCCD- 1933-2] – with a quintet instrumentation remains the most informative of his abilities as a soloist.


The scored passages are generally brief, and, apart from a few meandering contributions from Jack Montrose and Bob Gordon on tenor and baritone saxophones respectively, the leader fills all the available solo space with notable effect.

His consistency makes it hard to single out an performance as exceptional, though the quick-fire Whose Blues? Is a reminder that real spontaneity is less a matter of technical command than of a steady flow of ideas. Almost impressive in this respect are Prime Rib, with its double-time phrases, and the breaks of You Stepped Out of a Dream.

Niehaus wrote the arrangements for all the recordings dealt with here, and these show a nicely understated skill, nearly always being shorn of unnecessary gesture. As his was a musical family, he began his studies early and thus had a better chance of acquiring sound theoretical knowledge than many jazzmen. This places an agreeable variety of writing techniques at his disposal, but he is aware of the dangers of over-elaboration in the modest circumstances of small combo jazz.


[The Original Jazz Classic CD tray plate notes offer this overview of the recording.


“Lennie Niehaus’s first album is his most intimate. The music is rich in the colorful, complex writing that he would pursue on larger canvasses as his career progressed, while the compact sound of the quintet focuses attention on Niehaus, the fluent, Parker-inspired yet quite personal alto saxophonist. What emerges are well-balanced performances from two distinct ensembles.

Eight tracks recorded in 1954 … feature an inspired three-saxophone front line with Jack Montrose and Bob Gordon, plus the great Monty Budwig/Shelly Manne rhythm section. Four additional titles by a 1956 unit with Manne, Stu Williamson, Hampton Hawes, and red Mitchell were added for a 12-inch release, and represent Niehaus, a paragon of West Coast Jazz, in his most East Coast mood.”

On the sleeve of his second LP [Zounds! The Lennie Niehaus Octet! – Contemporary C-3540; OJCCD- 1892-2] Lennie writes: 

“With the more intellectual and academic approach there is a tendency for … work to become contrived and esoteric. It must be remembered that most modern jazz compositions written during the past few years are no more ‘modern’ than things Bartok, Berg, Schoenberg and others wrote twenty of thirty years ago.”]




[Max continues] Such a viewpoint is healthy, first because it is historically and technically realistic, and second because it is a corrective to the attitude of many jazzmen who in the past have imagined themselves to be daring iconoclasts while purveying what actually was simple and conservative music.

On the octet performances on his second LP Niehaus still occupies most of the solo space and is fully able to justify this. His arrangements are similar in general style to many others being written on the West Coast at that time, and what individual character they possess is due more to certain technical details than to an overall new approach. Such features most often arise from his concern with unity, and he is fond of deriving introductions, bridge passages and codas from the theme, or part of it, whenever possible. Instances are Night LifeHave You Met Miss Jones? and Circling the Blues; also typical of Niehaus is the way the introduction to The Night We Called It A Day recurs in sequential form to effect a modulation.

The first batch of octet scores have a pleasingly full texture, with the themes announced mainly in block chords. By the jazz standards of his time, Niehaus had a quite extensive, though in no way personal, harmonic vocabulary, so these parallel chords often are interesting, and are effectively distributed over the ensemble.


The result, however, could easily have been a rather too consistent harmonic richness, so he occasionally scores a passage for the horns without the rhythm section, as in How About You?, or has the drums only supply interjections, as on Figure Eight. He has many similar procedures to ensure variety, such as the bridge to Night Life, first played in block chords then scored contrapuntally on its return.

Another example is the first section of the code on The Way You Look Tonight, where each horn plays a separate line based on a different part of the theme; the result is of considerable harmonic and contrapuntal interest, and one regrets this passage only being four bars long. Even drum solos are made to further the development of the piece, as in The Way You Look Tonight, where, the piano and bass silent, the percussionist for a while alternates bars with the front line. There is a similar episode on Seaside.


Such devices, though, are very far from exhausting the scope of an ensemble … [featuring Lennie - alto sax, Jack Montrose - tenor sax and Bill Perkins - baritone sax, Stu Williamson - trumpet, Bob Enevoldsen - value trombone, Lou Levy – piano, Monty Budwig – bass and Shelly Manne – drums], and Niehaus appears to have been conscious of the almost unrelieved homophony of the above scores.

[Since Max doesn’t discuss the four compositions featuring Octet No. 2, made up of Lennie – alto sax, Bill Perkins moving to tenor sax, Pepper Adams – baritone sax, Vince De Rosa – French Horn, Frank Rosolino – trombone, James McAlister – tuba, Red Mitchell – bass, and Mel Lewis – drums, that also appear on Zounds!, I thought perhaps the following comments from the original LP liner notes by Arnold Shaw might prove descriptive in this regard:

“ The fact is that the four new arrangements are less linear. The various horns do not have completely free, independent lines, and the drive is toward a coordinated swinging beat. ‘I still don’t go for blowing arrangements,’ Lennie said recently. ‘I like to write backgrounds and interludes, and my goal is a swinging line’ Whether the octet is taking an ensemble chorus or Lennie weaving, at break-neck speed around the ensemble, the Niehaus combo jumps and rocks and swings.”]

[Max continues] In his third LP [Lennie Niehaus The Octet #2, Vol. 3 Contemporary C-3503; OJCCD 1767-2] there is a certain amount of section differentiation though not enough.



Alto saxophone and trombone contrast tellingly with the full band on Cooling It, as do alto and tenor in Bunko, yet such antiphony is infrequent, and counterpoint mainly conspicuous by its absence.

[Since Max gives rather short shrift to this album in his essay, the following comments about the recording’s personnel and Lennie’s playing from John S. Wilson’s liner notes to the album might prove germane.

“The present bath of octet selections is played by a slightly different group than the preceding set. Newcomers to this octet, but familiar figures on the West Coast jazz scene, are Jimmy Giuffre on baritone saxophone, Bill Holman on tenor and Pete Jolly on piano. Along with the holdovers – Stu Williamson on trumpet, Bob Enevoldsen on valve trombone, Monty Budwig on bass, Shelly Manne on drums and, of course, Niehaus himself – they make up a select group of top-ranking Coast jazzmen.

Niehaus’ playing has an ease, an unharried continuity which can only be accomplished by a musician who is beyond being consciously concerned with technique, whose feeling in performance is instinctively a swinging one and who can, consequently, devote himself completely to the creative requirements of his performance. There can be no doubt that these creative requirements are exceedingly demanding. ….

[Niehaus’] tone is almost unique among modern alto saxophonists. It is rich, rounded and warmly full-blooded and yet light enough not to clog up the quickly moving line of his style. It gives a vitality to his playing which is missing in some of the more wraith-like attacks adopted by current alto men.

A rich tone and a riding sense of swing would be of little use to Niehaus, of course, if his ideas were routine. Fortunately, his concepts are fresh and provocative not only in his individual solo performances but in his writing, too.”


As previously noted, not included in Max’s article was any reference to Lennie Niehaus, Vol. 4: The Quintets and Strings [Contemporary C 3510; OJCCD 1858-2] that tracks with strings and Lennie on alto, strings augmented by Lennie on alto, Bill Perkins on tenor and Bob Gordon on baritone and four cuts with a quintet fronted by Lennie on alto and Stu Williamson on trumpet with a rhythm section of Hawes, Budwig and Manne.




[In his liner notes, Barry Ulanov offered the following reflections on Lennie’s playing:

“The alto is to the present jazz era what the tenor saxophone was to the one just before it; a great many musicians play it, and some of them inordinately well. As a result, the instrument currently enjoys much favor with the jazz public …. But if it has reached high jazz rank, it has also suffered: there is a terrible sameness about the work of all too many of these stars, a monotony based on the brilliant examples of a Parker, a Konitz or the like ….


All of which explains why I enjoy the playing of Lennie Niehaus as much as I do ….
One can say that it is his sound, a quite modern one, that makes him so welcome betwixt and alongside his colleagues; but others offer a not dissimilar sound. Perhaps, then, it is his beat; but that too, though not as familiar among present-day altoists, can be heard and felt on his horn. If not the sound and the beat, then the length of his lines. This, maybe, but not all by itself, for the long line is very much with us these days on alto, and good to have, but not any guarantee of identity.

No, not one of these things, but all of them in copious abundance, and held together, as he holds everything else in the proceedings in balance and bearing, by a widely resourceful musicianship. Thus diversity, thus originality; thus ripeness and no monotony and, for what it is worth, my very high esteem for Lennie Niehaus."]


[Max continues] On his fifth record [Lennie Niehaus Vol. 5: The Sextet, Contemporary C-3524; OJCCD 1944-2] for sextet, however, Niehaus included well-paced duets between alto and tenor saxophones and trumpet and baritone saxophone in Thou Swell, and Three of a Kind has an adroit fugal introduction and coda.





There are effective dialogues between soloist and ensemble here, also, particularly on Belle of the Ball and As Long As I Live, some imaginative scored background to solos ….

[The Original Jazz Classic CD tray plate notes offer this overview of the recording.

“In the mid-1950’s, Lennie Niehaus avoided cliché, incorporated audacious harmonic ideas, and distilled the essentials of big band writing into arrangements for small groups. His recordings are still notable in the 21st century for their freshness and daring.

In this fifth of his series of albums for the Contemporary label, Niehaus sets himself the chamber music challenge of achieving proportion among four horns, bass and drums, without piano to cushion the sound, delineate the harmonies, and unify the ensemble.


The result was a collection of pieces performed with gem-like clarity by players who executed his writing perfectly and brought to their solos the creativity that made them star improvisers.

Niehaus’ alto saxophone was matched by Bill Perkins, Jimmy Giuffre, Stu Williamson, Shelly Manne, and the brilliant, underappreciated bassist Buddy Clark.”
]


[Max concludes] In solo Niehaus is as good as before, although the only other improvisations of real merit on these recordings are by pianist Lou Levy in the first octet disc and by Stu Williamson on both trumpet and valve trombone in the sextet LP. Indeed, the assurance and conviction of the latter’s work on the former instrument in Thou Swell, I Wished on the Moon, Knee Deep and As Long As I Live mark it as being among his best on record. Bill Perkins, on tenor saxophone, is also heard to pleasing, if rather nonchalant, effect in Three of a Kind and As Long As I Live. The gulf (in terms of invention) between the leader and several of his other bandsmen, however, is rather clearly shown by the chase passages of Whose Blues? and Rick’s Tricks, and even more by the long series of twelve- and – twenty-four bar solos in Circling the Blues.

The point is confirmed in a different way by Niehaus’ success with slow ballads, particularly The Night We Called It a Day and Our Love is Here To Stay on the octet records. Best, however, is the quintet Day by Day, which begins and ends with some exceptionally subtle harmonic writing that creates a feeling of remoteness which is quite contrary to the original melody’s banality and exactly appropriate to Niehaus’ very sensitive improvisation.

This can stand beside Jimmy Giuffre’s beautiful Lotus Bud recorded with Shorty Rogers or Art Pepper’s Jazz Chorale recorded with John Graas. The same side of Niehaus’ musical personality is also reflected in two compositions, Night Life and Debbie, slow lyrical pieces of some melodic distinction. Also attractive are Take It from Me, which has a forty bar chorus instead of the usual thirty-two, and Elbow Room, a blues with a bridge.

Writing and playing like this did show perfectly explicit promise for Niehaus’ further growth. Despite a few excellent later recordings [I Swing for You, Mercury MG 36118; Lone Hill Jazz CD 10241], such as his striking version of Perkins’s Little Girl Blues and Benny Golson’s Four Eleven West, that promise was not really fulfilled, eventually he stopped making LPs, and, finally, dropped out of sight. Presumably Niehaus must be regarded as another casualty of the hostile circumstances in which jazz has always found itself.



The “hostile environment” for Jazz that Max refers to was to become even more hostile as the years rolled along, and Lennie was to survive it by taking his orchestrating skills into the Hollywood studies and to become a prolific writer for films. But we’ll save that part of Lennie’s story for another time.
The editors of JazzProfiles certainly agree with Ted Gioia’s following assessment of Lennie Niehaus:

“His powerful technical command of the saxophone, his intuitive linear approach to improvisation, and his sweet tone made Niehaus a likely candidate as the next alto star on the coast.” West Coast Jazz: Modern Jazz in California, 1945-1960 [p. 163].



And while a Niehaus' star did ascend, it would take on a different form.


Monday, June 1, 2020

The Stage Door Swings



All of the arrangements are by Lennie Niehaus.