Monday, April 18, 2022

Woody Herman, The Metropole Cafe and Gene Lees

 © Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


“Scuffling,” in the sense of getting by on a low income or struggling financially is not a term used very much these days in Jazz circles, although given the deleterious effects of two years of the pandemic on musicians’ incomes, it could very well be.


But it certainly was applicable to the lives of many of those attempting to make their way in Jazz during the years following the breakup of the big bands in the late 1940s and early 1950s.


Duke Ellington, Count Basie, Stan Kenton and Woody Herman managed to keep their bands going, although Basie and Herman resorted to smaller combos in the 1950s before reinstituting their larger ensembles.


Reviewing the trials and tribulations they encountered, sometimes one gets the sense that their passionate love of the music was the only thing that kept them alive during their early years of trying to make it in the music.


And this was true not only of this select group of big band leaders but it also pertained to those whose careers were based on writing about the music.


Given the success he had with his subscription-based Jazzletter from 1981 until his death in 2010, one might be surprised to learn that Gene Lees did his share of scuffling until the royalties from his English translations of the lyrics for some of the hit tunes associated with the bossa nova kicked in along with the subsequent revenues from his writings and books. 


One of these books is Leader of the Band: The Life of Woody Herman [1995]. Some Jazz fans - especially those awaiting his never-to-materialize biography of the late pianist, Bill Evans, with whom he was a close friend - were quite surprised when Gene wrote his Woody bio.


But after you read the following excerpts from the book, perhaps you’ll better understand why he took on this project. They will also give you a renewed appreciation for the scuffling the Jazz musicians endure to make the music happen.


“Of the time in his life just before the birth of the new band. Woody said, "Once again I was running out of gas. I took a small group on the road." And that group was the nucleus of the new band, which had the same rhythm section — Pierce, Andrus, and Hanna — and Chase as lead trumpeter.

"It was really tough to get bookings," Woody said. "And yet, that was the beginning of the '60s band, right there. What put it together was the Metropole."


The Metropole was a rowdy cavernous bar on the east side of Seventh Avenue in midtown Manhattan. It booked small jazz groups in its upstairs room. Its main, ground-floor room didn't even have a bandstand. Woody was asked by the management (and I never did find out who owned the place) to bring a big band into that room. But where could it play?


Behind the bar. The bar was very long, running perhaps fifty feet back into the darkness of the place. Behind the backs of the bartenders was a long platform. If a band were to play there, it would be under conditions that violated every principle of acoustics that big bands had always observed: saxes in a line in front, trombones seated behind them, trumpets behind them, on three platforms rising to the rear. Rhythm sections were placed to one side, usually stage right, audience left. The reason for this arrangement was a practical one: so the musicians could hear each other and thus play tightly. At the Metropole, if Woody brought in a big band, they would have to stand, not sit, in a straight line. Furthermore, the band would face a mirrored wall; not only would the musicians be staring at themselves, but their projected sound would come snapping back into their faces. Woody should have turned down the job; he didn't. The arrangement should have been a disaster; it wasn't.


The unorthodox formation baffled musicians who came in to listen. With the rhythm section in the middle and the saxes standing audience left, the brass audience right, the end man on the one side was a good fifty feet from the end man on the other, and the acoustic delay between the two ends of the band was considerable. How did they manage to play with rhythmic coherence? They had found an odd solution to the problem. They watched the drums in the mirror on the facing wall. More specifically, they watched Jake Hanna’s high hat, and played to that. And some of the band's hottest nights occurred at the Metropole.


The Metropole became the band's base of operations for the next several years. "It took a lot of responsibility off me," Woody said. "The salaries of the band and so on were paid by this place. And I was actually given a salary that simply would take care of my immediate needs. And we could pick and choose a time. If we got some good dates, we could go out for two weeks or four weeks, and come back and go back in for two or four weeks, or whatever we wanted. It was a great place to break in a band, by sheer necessity, because you either played together or you'd never see each other again. It was like being in a police lineup above a bar and playing into a mirror for a baffle. But it really worked into a remarkably quick way to get a band in shape.


"Another thing that made it all possible was, in the midst of this whole scene, I went in with the rhythm section and did a quartet album for Philips. It was the first successful album we'd had in several years, as far as sales and [air] play went. And from that I was able to convince them, because we were now in the Metropole, that they should record a big band. They had no eyes. Most labels didn't at that period. But they went ahead with it.


"Sal Nistico, Chuck Andrus, and Jake Hanna were there, constantly, and Nat Pierce and Chase were there every night, and Nat got different trumpet players at different times. They were usually guys from Boston or the New York area. That was his department. And then the trombones. It was some time during that earliest time when we brought in a guy from Richmond, Virginia, Henry Southall."


By now Abe Turchen was the band's business manager. He and Woody had taken office space at 200 West 57th Street, an outer room and then two smaller rooms, which looked north over 57th Street. At a desk to your left as you entered sat Dick Turchen, Abe's nephew, who sometimes had worked as the band's road manager; he had made the South American tour with Woody. But he now had a business of his own. Video Components, and was only peripherally involved with the band.


On the facing wall as you entered were two doors. The one on the right was Abe's. The one on the left led to a small room sublet from Abe and Woody by one of Woody's old friends, Lou Singer, an excellent orchestral composer and sometime amanuensis to composer Frank Loesser. Lou had written Sleepy Serenade and, after he actually heard someone make this order in a restaurant, One Meat Ball. That silly little song haunted him, but he was a well-trained composer, educated at Juilliard and Columbia University, who had studied with Wallingford Riegger. His office contained a spinet piano, a nondescript settee, a desk, chair, telephone, and nothing else. He was a very humorous man and kept the office bright.


The building was heavily tenanted by show-business people. Down the hall was the office of the Modern Jazz Quartet, run by their manager, Monte Kay. Elsewhere in the building was that of Woody Allen, whom Woody would occasionally encounter in the elevator, saying to the comedian, "Hi, I'm the old one."


Woody had enormous faith in Abe Turchen's acumen and gave him total control of the business. Abe, who stood about five-foot-eleven, was bulky now, his weight having risen to about 250 pounds. He always looked rumpled. Abe had married again. His second wife, Cindy Richmond, had worked briefly at the Copacabana. At the time of the marriage, she was nineteen, Abe was forty-three. She was very pretty. She and Abe had two sons, Steven, born August 3, 1957, and David, born June 22, 1959. They lived in a corner apartment on Riverside Drive at 78th Street that commanded a magnificent view of Riverside Park, the 79th Street Boat Basin, the smooth expanse of the Hudson River, and New Jersey beyond it. In the living room were a heavy and well-upholstered pale blue sofa and armchairs.


Abe Turchen had remarkable powers of persuasion and booked the band with ingenuity. At the same time, he was an indefatigable pessimist; his prognosis for almost everything was: "It'll never happen. It'll never happen." He liked show-business comics, particularly Jack E. Leonard, always called Fat Jack Leonard in the business, and I think Abe, whether consciously or unconsciously, affected Jack's misanthropic style of delivery. He tried to be humorous, with only intermittent success, his efforts to tell Jewish jokes foundering on his inability to get the hang of the accent. By contrast, Lou Singer, a native New Yorker, had the accent under perfect control, and always knew the latest Broadway jokes.


Abe would sit there every day, playing solitaire and watching sports on television, quietly placing bets on the telephone, shuffling the incredible clutter of papers on his big old wooden desk in a search for some phone number or other, and from time to time on sudden impulse or inspiration picking up the phone to place a bet or book the band into some improbable gig like the opening of a shopping mall. Meanwhile, as Woody noted to Stuart Troup, the outer office was "usually loaded with bookmakers, moneylenders, and others he was doing business with." Abe, as everybody said, was a character. Anyone who could book that band and carry all the information in his head would seem a natural at counting cards, and everyone who ever saw him play in Las Vegas said he was a master at blackjack. "It's too bad he went overboard," Ingrid Herman said, "and bet on the wrong things, instead of gambling like a professional."


The new band was taking form. And because of his obvious organizational abilities, Nat Pierce was road manager. This meant he was in charge of paying the men, getting them to and from each job, and seeing that things ran smoothly.


It was at this point that I got involved with Woody and with that office. I was editor of Down Beat from May, 1959, to September, 1961, when I resigned. In February, 1962, I left for Latin America with the Paul Winter Sextet. By the time we got back in July. I had translated into English some of the songs of a Brazilian composer I had met, the late Antonio Carlos Jobim. No one in New York was interested in them.


Those first months in New York were terrifying. I could not sell my writing, either my prose or my songs, and I was living at the West Side YMCA, a famous but depressing oasis for artists arriving in the city. Tennessee Williams wrote some of his early plays in that place.


I rapidly learned a dark lesson during that period. When I had been at Down Beat, I was useful to the record companies, and they treated me with a graciousness of which, fortunately, I was always a little suspicious. But now that I was needy, I learned quickly who my friends were. And they were the musicians. They were the ones who stood by me in a bad time, and I have never forgotten who they were. The complete list would be long, but their names include Art Farmer, Miles Davis, Gil Evans, Dave Brubeck, Paul Desmond, Bob Brookmeyer, Philly Joe Jones, Wynton Kelly, Gerry Mulligan, and, particularly; Woody Herman and Bill Evans.


Somehow or other I ran into Woody. I probably went to hear the band at the Metropole. I saw him repeatedly over the period of a month or so. And Abe Turchen said to me, "A guy like you shouldn't be living like this. Why don't you come to work for us? We can give you a small salary, and you'll have the use of the office." "Doing what?" I asked.


"I don't know," Abe said. "Publicity, You could help us with that."


I took the offer. Later, I was talking to Nat Pierce about the time when

Abe hired me. Nat said, "Abe didn't hire you. Woody told him to do it. I was

there."


Thus I became one of the many souls whose lives were reshaped by

Woody Herman.


With what Woody was paying me, I was able to take a small basement apartment at the rear of a brownstone (actually, the stone was gray) on West End Avenue between 70th and 71st Streets. A door opened onto my own cool, shaded little courtyard that let you look up at a geometric piece of sky against which the leaves of a locust tree made patterns. Around the corner from me, in a large modern building, lived Erroll Garner, Roger Kellaway, and many other musicians. My little apartment became a meeting place of sorts. Antonio Carlos Jobim came to New York, and we wrote a number of songs in that apartment. The first of the songs I had translated in Rio, Quiet Nights of Quiet Stars (Corcovado), began to be recorded, one of the first versions being by Stan Getz and Astrud Gilberto. I wrote some others with Gary McFarland.


I got used to the chaotic nature of the Woody Herman office. One day he called in from the road, seeking someone's phone number. He said, "Take a look in the files, and . . . . " He broke off, laughing, and said, "Hah! What files?"


When Woody ran out of clean shirts on the road, he simply bought more. He accumulated huge quantities of them, along with his shoes: he carried with him as many as twenty-six pairs of shoes hand-finished by his father. There was a suitcase full of shirts under a bench in the office, and more clothes in a closet. He came in from the road and said, "Have you got any room at your place for these things?"


"Yeah, I s'pose," I said.


"Would you mind taking 'em home and keeping 'em for me?" I remember that there was an excellent pair of gray slacks and a brass-buttoned blue blazer in this accumulation of unused wardrobe.


I had discovered a curious object in a drawer. Woody by then was losing his hair. It had thinned and receded from his forehead. It troubled me that he was, as it seemed to me, growing old: he was forty-nine. The object in the drawer was something hairy. I asked Abe, "What is this weird-looking thing?” Abe said, "It's Woody's rug. He hates it. Won't wear it." So when Woody asked me to take his clothes home, I opened the drawer, took out the toupee, dangled it between my thumb and forefinger, and said, "What would you like me to do with this?"


"Oh, that's disgusting!" Woody said. "Get rid of it!" And I tossed it into a wastebasket.


The musicians in those days in New York used to hang out in four bars, within walking distance of one another in the midtown area: Jim and Andy's, Junior's, Charlie's, and the Spotlight. Some favored one over the other, but most of the jazz musicians patronized all four. I was partial to Jim and Andy's. When Woody's band was in town, playing two or three weeks at the Metropole, its members could often be found at Jim and Andy's, Woody among them. You'd find him hanging out with his guys, listening to the woes of the younger musicians with a paternal patience. Everybody by now called him the Old Man. I do not know whether they had yet started calling him the Road Father, but that was the role he was more and more assuming: the great teacher, the one-man finishing school. 


The band was becoming phenomenal, now that it had overcome the problem of being stretched out in a line. On the left were the four saxes. Then came the drummer, Jake Hanna, then the bassist. Chuck Andrus. Then Nat Pierce, seated at a small upright piano, the only man with his back to the audience, and for that matter the only man who wasn't standing, playing the charts from memory. Then came the five trumpets, and on the far right, the three trombones.


And sometimes, standing at the bar, facing them, was in effect another Woody Herman band, veterans of the earlier herds, including trombonist Willie Dennis, Al Cohn, Zoot Sims, Stan Getz, Don Lamond (busy with studio work and a regular at Jim and Andy's), and more. Sometimes, when they were in New York, Johnny Mandel and Ralph Burns would wander by. The members of that Four Brothers band who had treated him with such contempt had grown up and now treated him with reverence. It was an incredibly celebratory atmosphere, for the old hands who came in would marvel at the prowess of this new generation of players. The band played Caldonia at twice the speed of the original record, and when he sang it, Woody stumbled over the time, trying to keep up. When the Neal Hefti trumpet unison passage arrived, Bill Chase would jump his part an octave above the others so that the thing bordered on the frightening.


Phil Wilson recalled, "The Tonight Show was at the Hudson Theater. When it let out, all the guys from the Tonight Shaw were there, hanging out. And you'd have Dizzy running in and Ben Webster, I was just in heaven. Woody used to call me a stranger in paradise, with all of these people. Wow. What a time."


The band was contracted for nine weeks at the Metropole that year, and had the management been able to get more time, it would have stayed there longer. But the bookings were accruing, I was managing to place a great deal of publicity about the band, but it soon became unnecessary; the publicity was generating itself, with critics and musicians alike saying this was the best band Woody had led since the Four Brothers band. By the end of 1962, Abe had booked the band all the way into August, 1963.


George Simon wrote in the New York Herald Tribune:


What is so exciting about this particular Herd?


First of all, it has the almost-forgotten sort of pulsing ensemble sound that makes you want to cheer. The arrangements are exciting. The brass is brilliant. The trumpets blast as one. They blow high, but they're accurate and they get a great blend. The saxes are loose and easy. And the rhythm section — well, if there's one reason why this Herd stands out from among all the rest, it's because of the rhythmic trio's fantastic, swinging drive .... In Jake Hanna, Woody has the most propulsive big-hand drummer to emerge on the jazz scene in years. The way he drives everything before him (with valuable assists from Chuck Andrus) is absolutely astounding.


He did not exaggerate. Quincy Jones had gone into debt trying to start a big band, and the magnificent Gerry Mulligan Concert Jazz Band could only make a living overseas. Who was responsible for this remarkable new band? 

The principals inclined to give rather than take credit.


Nat Pierce told me, "It's because of him — Woody. If there are so few big bands out here, it's because there are so few professional bandleaders. Woody's a pro.”

"Being a professional bandleader involves knowing when to let a guy play because he's playing exceptionally well. Some leaders might not like to see their sidemen getting a lot of applause. Woody's delighted. Another thing: Woody's an entertainer as well as a musician. He can get away with a lot of things on the mike, quips and that sort of thing, that younger guys couldn't.”


"One reason the guys love to work for Woody is that we never feel we're actually working for the man. It's more like working with him. He appreciates what we're doing, and he lets us know it. And the guys appreciate and respect him. So they work all the harder."


One night when Al Cohn came by to hear the band, I asked him why all

Woody's groups, no matter what their size, had the same quality of fire.,


"It's the way Woody rehearses a band." Al said. "He lets the guys play around with a new chart, run it down themselves, get their own feeling going on it. After that, he steps in and cleans it up. For this reason, the guys get a lot of themselves and a lot of feeling into it."


Bill Chase said that it was the same now as in Al's days with the band. "We'll get a thing run down," Bill said, "and then Woody will come in and say, 'That's good, but I don't like this other thing. So go from letter K over to here, and then take it out.' And he always seems to be right.


"I'd like to make this one point, though: that quality isn't always there. I've been with Woody when it wasn't there. We have to have the right rhythm section. Jake Hanna is very important to the feeling this band gets."


Jake said, "Woody's flexible. He goes along with the way the band feels instead of sticking strictly to the book. That makes it always interesting and exciting for us. If a man's really blowing, Woody doesn't stop him after eight bars because the arrangement says so. He lets him keep on wailing."


Woody said, "If I may be so bold, I'll compare myself to Basie and Ellington. If Duke had a whole bunch of new people tomorrow, it would sound just like Duke. The same with Basie.


"But I have to have the right kind of people. If you have people who are content in what they're doing and believe in it, you'll have a hell of a lot better result. If I haven't got the right people, I can't do it.


"I think I'm a good organizer and a good editor. I try to let the band have its head and then strengthen what they're doing.


"Mind you, for each guy I've told 'Go blow' there have been nine others I've told, 'Don't blow.' I don't mean to upset anyone's progress, but at that point I decide whether a guy should blow or not. For the first two weeks, I don't listen to a man. I'll hold off for a while. And then I want to hear him."


Actually, the process was a little softer than that. When a new young musician would come into the band. Woody would tell him not to worry about anything, just relax and get used to the book. Then, when it seemed the young man had become familiar with it, Woody would hold up a finger and nod to the musician, meaning, "Take one chorus." If that chorus went well, he might hold up two fingers, meaning, "Take another one." And thus he would judge. He was no martinet.


But, Woody said, "we've got to have pros in this band, in both attitude and playing ability.


"A guy who's been a tremendous aid to me has been Nat Pierce — his writing, his way of encouraging others. He's got everybody in the band writing. This band has more amateur writers! I'm even writing some."


Phil Wilson thinks Woody had mysterious abilities that defied analysis. "In front of a band he was very subtle," Phil said. "He would react. He never missed a note. He listened to what everyone was doing. He sold the music to the public by his reactions to it. It could be the facial expression, it could be the way he moved his coat. He had a show-biz sense. He could take something outrageous that we were doing back in the band, and react to it with an outrage, much like the Marx Brothers, and a lay person who knew nothing about music — particularly the stuff we were doing, because damn! it was advanced — would get it. Woody would make light of it, make fun out of it, make pathos out of it, he would react to it so that the common man would be able to say, 'Hey, there's something going on back there.' I watched him night after night after night, wondering, 'How can I ever do that?'


"For all the freedom of the band, there was a discipline there. Very strict. We had a respect for it. And you knew it. We were in shape. You could confront Woody in the most embarrassing situations you could imagine, and he was together when he had to be — always!"


Neal Hefti thinks that Woody was intimidated by the sheer brilliance of the players he had hired for the Second Herd. Phil Wilson concurs. Phil said:

"Woody was a great clarinet player. The problem with him is that the son of a bitch developed to such a musical degree that he got nervous in front of his own band. If we were playing the Dallas Country Club, which we often did, and the lights were out and we were doing great old standards and nobody was clapping, boy! how he played. I'm a connoisseur of clarinet players. I look at clarinet players like I look at great wines. Woody was a giant player. But when he had a high-pressure band, he was intimidated by it. And the band I was on was high pressure.


"God, what a musical band."


But mere musicality was not enough to make the band a success. The ballroom business was all but finished. Booking agencies were not interested in helping anyone build a band. The cost of transporting a band by bus had risen to fifty cents a mile — a small figure now, but not a small one then. Furthermore, booking agencies were inclined to kill a band with one-nighters. The reason was peculiar. The American Federation of Musicians allowed a booker to take 20 percent of the fee for one-night engagements, but only 10 percent for long engagements, known as locations, such as the Metropole. Further, the collective gross for a week of one-nighters ran higher than that for location jobs. So it was in the short-term financial interests of the bookers to get double the commission on a larger gross. But without being able to stay in one place at least for a little while from time to time, a band became exhausted.


Abe despised booking agents. He said in his mortuary voice, "We work with agencies but not for any one of them." And so he functioned as both manager and booker for the band, which technically was contrary to an AFM regulation forbidding anyone's filling both roles. But Abe collected only a manager's commission. His years on the road with the band stood him in good stead now that he was booking it. "For one thing," he told me, "I know every ballroom operator in the country."


And when any one market grew weak, Abe looked about for new ones. "I started the whole college market," he claimed. "I started in it in 1948 and 49. This was after we came back from Cuba and broke down to six men. The band business was down to a nub. I picked up the phone and started calling small colleges, with 500 students and up. I'd say, 'I know you don't operate in midweek, but how'd you like to have the Woody Herman band for nothing?'”


He would let the school take its expenses for tickets and publicity off the top. Woody would then get everything up to a predetermined figure, perhaps a thousand dollars, after which the proceeds were shared by the band and the school. This ingenious but simple plan took all risk out of the venture for the schools.


"Colleges were the only reason Woody survived for twelve years," Abe said.


Woody's view was different. When I told him what Abe had said, Woody said, "Abe's the reason I survived."






Thursday, April 14, 2022

Talking Jazz by Randy Smith

 © Copyright ® Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


Praise for Talking JAZZ


"Randy L. Smith has written many excellent pieces for Jazz Journal. . . . producing fresh, crisply presented new information on his subjects. Talking Jazz will be a stimulating and engaging read." 

-Mark Gilbert, editor, Jazz Journal,


"The author takes us on a fascinating journey from Tacoma, Seattle, Bellingham and Port Townsend in Washington State to the Kansai region of Japan. Along the way there are entertaining and informative portraits of Bud Shank, Red Rodney, Barney Kessel, Bill Crow, Ernestine Anderson and Eiji Kitamura. He has also interviewed several performers who may be new to readers but each has a compelling story to tell." 

-Gordon Jack, author Fifties Jazz Talk


"After scrolling through Talking Jazz, Randy's love for jazz and respect for the musicians who make it were obvious to me. I read the first few pages of the introduction and was hooked from the start. Congratulations, Randy, on a job well done!"

-Rebecca Kilgore, acclaimed jazz vocalist


"Randy Smith's Talking Jazz offers a treasure trove of new and original writings about the well-known and unknown lives of jazz musicians spanning four decades and six, different geographic locales. Almost as important as the subjects under discussion is the quality of the writing. The book is a joy to read; full of interesting pieces, interviews and contributions from guest writers. Books as illuminating and interesting as Talking Jazz don't come along very often, all the more reason to snap a copy of this one up and savor it."

- Steve Cerra, Jazzprofiles.blogpsot.com (blog)


"Randy L. Smith's subjects are not the superstars of jazz, but real working artists who provide the day-to-day sense that is so important to our understanding. Throughout, the author's personal accounts succeed in giving the reader a feel for the actual lives of lesser-known but nevertheless important jazz artists, all with stories to tell." 

-David Haney, editor, Cadence, The Independent Journal of Creative Improvised Music


"This conversational yet also detailed reminiscence of a life of listening to jazz is an altogether pleasant read and makes a considerable contribution to the body of knowledge about jazz in the Pacific Northwest."

-Paul de Barros, Down Beat, The Seattle Times, Earshot Jazz


"Great storytelling. I think it's particularly worthwhile in that it includes stories from around the region as well as Seattle. Lots of good info here I haven't seen elsewhere. I'll be back to it for more!" 

-Jim Wilke, host and producer of Jazz Northwest, KNKX


"I believe this book to be an important addition to our study of jazz music and its lexicon…. It has been a fun read and one that triggered so much in my own recollections. Randy has done a remarkable job with Talking Jazz.'

-Pete Fallico, The Doodlin' Lounge, San Jose, CA


I’ve included the above comments praising Talking Jazz: Profiles, Interviews, and Musings from Tacoma to Kansai to give you some perspective on the scope of this new book, as well as, it’s value as a compendium of original writings, interviews and reflections on the subject of Jazz by Randy L. Smith, a writer whose style is accessible, informative and entertaining.


Earning a living as a writer is no easy task under the best of circumstances and doubly so when the subject is Jazz, a form of musical artistry that has been bereft of a national audience and press for many, many years. 


And not only do we have to credit Randy for much new and original Jazz content, but we also have to thank him for the time and expense he incurred as a result of having to self-publish the book which is available through Amazon as a paperback selling for $19.99.


Randy sets the stage for his book at the outset with Kicking Off the Beat: A Note of Explanation: 


“I conceived this book assuming readers would have some familiarity with jazz. Having scanned the table of contents, the veteran listener will comprehend the significance of my section headings. I provide this note of explanation for those with limited jazz exposure.


The headings are meant to reference a typical jazz performance. First comes the opening theme, the statement of the head, or the melody of a tune. Accompanied by the rhythm section (piano, bass and drums), the head is played by the front-line instruments, say a saxophone and a trumpet, usually in unison or harmonized, sometimes in counterpoint. The start of "Ah-Leu-Cha" provides a good example of deft counterpoint by Miles Davis and Charlie Parker, commonly referred to as Bird. For my purpose, the opening theme serves as an introduction of how I came to jazz, and of how I grew up with the music to the point of wanting to document the lives and careers of the people who create it.


After the opening theme, I've inserted a solo break. That occurs when one of the instruments breaks away from the band, playing a brief unaccompanied lead-in to a solo chorus. Breaks can be dramatic, as with Bird's celebrated alto break after the thematic statement on Dizzy Gillespie's "Night in Tunisia." My solo break is a short tribute to the one-and-only Louis Armstrong.


Then come the choruses, the heart and soul of the jazz player's improvisation. A chorus consists of an equal number of measures and uses the same harmonic underpinning as the head. Upon this structure, the musician builds a solo. Some players let the tune itself guide their choruses, rifling off the melody; others favor the harmony, creating an entirely new melody with their solo. The lyrical cornetist Bobby Hackett was known as a melodic player, while a harmonically-advanced John Coltrane improvisation may give little indication of the original melody. The point is, what may seem like random notes to an uninitiated listener are actually based on either the melody or the harmony of the tune (or a combination of both). Some solos may be worked out, some spontaneous, but a good jazz musician is aware of the song at all times.


Sometimes players will have an idea in advance of how many choruses each will lake. Other times, circumstances influence the number. Paul Gonsalves, the great tenor man, famously put the Ellington Orchestra back on the jazz map after a fallow period for the Duke, closing his eyes and digging in for a marathon 27 choruses on "Diminuendo and Crescendo in Blue," nearly sparking a riot (or at least an orgy), at the 1956 Newport Jazz Festival.* For this book, choruses are analogous to chapters, each of the six corresponding to a geographical region that collectively illuminate my lifelong jazz journey.


After each soloist has had a say in the choruses, the leader might hold up four fingers, a signal to trade "fours." The chorus is divided into four-bar segments, each played by one of the musicians. It's akin to a musical conversation, each player riffing off the four bars a colleague has just played. Sometimes the horns alternate fours with the drummer. Fours are often playful, and in general, a lot of fun. So in that spirit, the fours here are given over to guest authors. Considering the brevity of a four-bar unit, I requested submissions of 600 - 1,000 words.


Finally, we have the closing theme (sometimes called the out chorus), a restatement of the head to end the performance. When the leader of a band points to his or her bean, that's a signal to wrap things up and take the song out. My closing theme consists of a summing up, plus two pieces I wanted to include in this book that did not fit into any of the six choruses.


So jazz novice, now you know everything you need to begin reading. Forge on, then—the wonderful world of jazz awaits!


But hold! One further point. Gale Madden, mystery woman of jazz, told me she and Chico Hamilton had been "running buddies." On the spot, I fell in love with the phrase. So if you chance to see it employed in these pages, please know that it refers to a very special kind of friend.


"Naturally, there is more to the story than this trim narrative suggests. Fodder, I guess, for my next book.”


In an earlier feature about Seattle-based pianist, Jack Brownlow, I wrote the following:


“Every town has one.


Whether it's Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Reno or Seattle.


Somewhere in these cities, there is an exceptional Jazz musician who is mainly known only to those familiar with the local Jazz scene.


For whatever reason, these local Jazz musicians don’t travel, preferring to stay close to home while working the occasional club date, party or benefit.


Every so often, a group of local admirers cobble some schimolies together and produce a compact disc to put on display their local favorite’s talents.


These fans know that their player is special and want portable accessibility to the music while at the same time doing their bit to document it for posterity.


Until the advent of e-commerce, the “distribution” of such recordings often consisted of making it available for sale on a card table that was staffed by someone before and/or after gigs or performances.


When you’ve listened to a lot of Jazz, you can usually tell when someone is special.


You hear it first in the phrasing and with the ready expression of ideas while soloing.


Jazz soloing is like the geometric head start in the sense that you never catch up.


When you improvise something it’s gone; you can’t retrieve it and do it again.


You have to stay on top of what you are doing as Jazz is insistently progressive – it goes forward with you or without you.


People who can play the music, flow with it. Their phrasing is in line with the tempo, the new melodies that they superimpose over the chord structures are interesting and inventive and they bring a sense of command and completion to the process of creating Jazz.


These qualities help bring some Jazz musicians to national, if not, international prominence. Deservedly so.  It’s not easy to play this stuff.


We buy their recordings, read articles about them in the Jazz press and attend their concerts and club dates.


But throughout the history of Jazz, be it in the form of what was referred to as “territory bands,” or local legends who never made it to the big time or recorded, or those who only played Jazz as a hobby, word-of-mouth communication somehow managed to inform us of the startling brilliance of these locally-based musicians.


Such was the case with pianist Jack Brownlow who for many years was one of the most highly regarded Jazz musicians in the greater-Seattle area.”


In Talking Jazz: Profiles, Interviews, and Musings from Tacoma to Kansai, Randy expands on this theme by “bringing to life” via a series of well-crafted interviews, relatively obscure Jazz artists based in the Pacific Northwest including Bill Ramsay, Chuck Stenz, Barney McClure, Don Lamphere, Freddie Greenwell, Bob Hammer and Floyd Sandifer, among many others.


In fairness, some like Bill Ramsay and Don Lamphere have had some national exposure along with other fine musicians hailing from the Pacific Northwest including bassist Red Kelly, vocalist Ernestine Anderson and bassist Buddy Catlett and Chuck Israels - all subjects with whom Randy visits in his book.


Jazz clubs including the New Orleans, the Pioneer Banque, Parnell’s and Jazz Alley are brought to life by Randy as the venues that gave these locals a chance to grow and develop along. He also provides informative background on the evolution of the Port Townsend Jazz Festival which provided a more expansive roster of Jazz talent including guitarist Barney Kessel, trumpeter Red Rodney, alto saxophonist Bud Shank, bassist John Clayton, and drummer Jeff Hamilton.


Randy’s travels also take him to Japan where he shares an insider’s look at Jazz musicians in the “Land of the Rising Sun” and later to Portland, OR where he conducts a marvelous interview with pianist-singer-songwriter, Dave Frishberg.


Randy’s writing is very straight-forward and direct. There’s not a lot of hyperbole or wasted language which makes for very enjoyable and compelling storytelling.


His book is a fun read and is arranged in such a way that the reader can take pleasure in what’s on offer at a leisurely pace.


If you are looking for something new and different on the subject of Jazz and its makers, Randy’s interviews and memoirs in Talking Jazz: Profiles, Interviews, and Musings from Tacoma to Kansai won’t disappoint.


Wednesday, April 6, 2022

“Fine As [Phineas] Can Be”: Phineas Newborn, Jr. [From the Archives; Revised]

 © -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved





[New Introduction for the previous posting of this piece plus the addition of a YouTube of Phineas playing Blues Theme for the Left Hand Only].

The annotation that accompanies the video of his appearance on Jazz Scene USA 1962 states that: "Now that the dust of history has settled, there can be no question that Phineas Newborn, Jr. [1931-1989] was one of Jazz's most important and enduring pianists." 

Blinded by his dazzling technique during the time he was on the scene, many critics dismissed him without catching on to his brilliant musicality.

We are fortunate that some producers (most notably Lester Koenig at Contemporary) saw fit to capture Newborn's artistry on record with at least some regularity."

Bassist Ray Brown had a great deal to do with keeping Phineas in the studios at Contemporary. After Les Koenig passed away, Ray enlisted the aid of Norman Granz at Pablo to record the reclusive Phineas.

While Norman's massive efforts on behalf of Jazz and its makers has finally been well-documented in Tad Hershorn's biography - Norman Granz: The Man Who Used Jazz For Justice - one wonders if the impresario efforts of Ray Brown will ever be documented in such fine fashion.

Dating back to his days with Dizzy Gillespie's Big Band in the mid-1940's until his death in 2002, Ray did so much to produce in-performance and recorded Jazz at the highest levels, efforts which, in many cases, remain anecdotal and largely undocumented.

Thank goodness Ray held Phineas near-and-dear-to-his-heart and created scenarios that brought him into the recording studio from time-to-time or the career of this great Jazz pianist would have been largely confined to recordings he made from about 1955-1965 [Phineas died in 1989.].

In addition to Phineas, Ray formed trios with pianists including Gene Harris, Benny Green, Larry Fuller, Geoff Keezer, Dado Moroni, not to mention his legendary association with pianist Oscar Peterson in the 1950s.

And then there are the numerous artists that Ray managed, including, for many years, vocalist Ella Fitzgerald, the almost countless number of recordings he made with artists that Norman Granz represented on his Verve and Pablo Records labels, and the Jazz concerts he produced both domestically and internationally for over forty [40] years.

I doubt that this side of Ray Brown's contributions to Jazz will ever be researched and written; I hope I'm wrong.

© -Steven Cerra, copyright protected; all rights reserved.


“This is the greatest thing that ever happened to Jazz – the greatest pianist playing today.  In every respect, he’s tremendous. He is just beautiful. A wonderful Jazz musician,”
- Jazz pianist, Gene Harris

“Technically, he was sometimes claimed to run a close second to Art Tatum. In reality, Newborn was a more effective player at slower tempos and with fewer notes; but he could be dazzling when he chose,…. A sensitive and troubled soul, even the lightest of his performances point to hidden depths of emotion.”
- Richard Cook and Brian Morton, The Penguin Guide to Jazz on CD, 6th Ed.

“I hear in him all that is emotional, as well as all that is cerebral and virtuosic, about jazz piano in one of its most sophisticated forms.”
- Leonard Feather

Legendary bassist Ray Brown, along with Les Koenig of Contemporary Records and Norman Granz at Pablo Records, were largely responsible for insuring that one of the greatest Jazz pianists of all-time – Phineas Newborn, Jr. [1931-1989] - didn’t slip into total obscurity following his initial acclaim.

Although Phineas was not a celebrity, he was highly regarded by knowledgeable Jazz fans, especially in the 1950's and 60's. ''In his prime, he was one of the three greatest jazz pianists of all time, right up there with Bud Powell and Art Tatum,'' said the late Leonard Feather, who for many years served as a Jazz critic for Downbeat magazine and The Los Angeles Times.

There was a time when Phineas looked set for stardom, but mental problems forced him to return to Memphis in the '60s, where he spent his remaining years struggling against the alcohol and drug problems that exacerbated an already fragile emotional state.

Whenever Phineas [who prefers to pronounce his name - “Fine as, ” with the accent of the first syllable, hence the title of Ray’s tribute tune] could pull himself together, Ray Brown brought him into the studio and recorded him in a trio setting along with Ray on bass and such drummers as Jimmy Smith or Elvin Jones on drums.

I got to know Phineas a little during the early 1960s when he played one of the week nights at The Manne Hole, drummer Shelly Manne’s venerable club in Hollywood. He usually worked with bassist Jimmy Bond and drummer Milt Turner, but drummer Frank Butler often performed with him, as well.

One night he told me “his [my] Count Basie story.  It seems that Bill Basie was a friend of his Dad, a drummer who led a Rhythm & Blues band on Memphis’ famous Beale Street during the late 1930s.  Basie nicknamed Phineas, Jr. “Bright Eyes” because ‘as a boy his eyes would light-up as soon as he heard the music!’”

It was staggering to try and take-in all that Phineas had to offer. His technique was phenomenal and he tossed off so many ideas while improvising that if you stopped concentrating even for a second you were lost.  Listening to him in such an informal and personal setting was an exhilarating experience. Sadly, it was often not much of a shared experience as he hardly drew an audience.

The legendary Jazz pianist George Shearing once said that the “trick” to this music is getting it from the head and into the hands. Based on my first-hand observation of Phineas, I had the feeling that he had invented the “trick!”

With his technique, harmonic mastery, rhythmic displacement, and brilliant tone, Phineas Newborn, Jr. was nothing short of a Jazz piano phenomena.



But prodigious technique is frequently more of a curse than a blessing in Jazz circles and is often heavily criticized.

As the late Jazz writer, Leonard Feather, pointed out in his liner notes to Phineas Newborn, Jr.: A World of Piano [Contemporary LP S-7600; OJCCD 175-2]:

“There has always been a tendency among music experts, and by no means only in jazz, to harbor misgivings about technical perfection. The automatic-reflex reaction is: yes, all the notes are there and all the fingers are flying, but what is he really saying? How about the emotional communication?

Art Tatum at the apex of his creative powers suffered this kind of treatment at the hands of a not inconsiderable pro­portion of the critics. Buddy De Franco, of course, has been a consistent victim. Phineas has been in similar trouble, and not because of any lack in his ability to transmit emotion but possibly, I suspect, because of the listeners' reluctance or in­ability to receive it. Nat Hentoff, in the notes for Maggie's Back in Town, pointed out that Phineas has "harnessed his prodigious technique during the past couple of years into more emotionally meaningful directions!" True, though conservative; I would lengthen the harness to four or five years. During that time, too, the technique has taken on even more astonish­ing means to accomplish even more incredible ends — witness one ploy that is uniquely remarkable: the ad lib use of galvanic lines played by both hands two octaves apart. Today, bearing in mind that Bernard Peiffer is French and Oscar Peterson Canadian, it would not be extravagant to claim that Phineas has no equal among American jazz pianists, from any standpoint, technical or esthetic. He is a moving, swinging, pianistically perfect gas.”

George Wein, the impresario who founded the Newport Jazz Festival, wrote these thoughts about Phineas and his music in 1956 as the liner notes to Phineas’ first album for Atlantic Records Here is Phineas [#1235; reissued on CD as Koch 8505].



For years now I've listened to people scream at me about unknown pianists they have discovered. "He’s greater than Bud . "He cuts Oscar . "He leaves Tatum standing still". As many times as I have heard these cries, that is how often I have been disappointed. In­variably, these unknowns are, at their best, simply minor talents, and, at their worst, pale copies of great pianists.

About a year ago I began to hear stories about a fan­tastic pianist in MemphisTenn. with the almost quaint sounding name of Phineas Newborn. Jr. Men I re­spected, such as John Hammond, Willard Alexander and, of course. Count Basie, among many others, insisted that I must hear this guy. Due to my previous sad experiences, I could not get excited. However, when I got a chance to really hear Phineas in Storyville [a nightclub in Boston which Wein owned], for the first time I was not disappointed. The unknown had lived up to his press notices.

Phineas Newborn, Jr. was born December 14. 1932 in MemphisTenn. I believe this makes him all of 23 years old at the recording of this album. In all my years of listening to music I have never encountered a music­ian of such tender years who had such a fantastic com­mand of his instrument. Perhaps my reaction to Phineas can be traced to my personal concern with the piano. If this was my only reason for liking him, then I say it would be sufficient, for to my knowledge the only pianist who has as great, or greater command of the piano is Art Tatum.



Phineas is a two handed pianist, as opposed to the tendency of modern pianists to dwell on the single finger, right hand style. The only time he can be ac­cused of being a one-handed pianist is when he puts his right hand in his pocket and plays two choruses of a ballad, such as Embraceable You. exclusively with his left hand. Unfortunately, he does not do this in this album, but when you see him in person, ask him to play a left-handed solo for you. His left hand is de­veloped to such an extent that he can and does execute any passage or chord with his left hand that he would do with his right. When you realize that he has the fattest right hand of anyone since Tatum (he might even exceed Tatum for sheer speed) then you get an idea of just what happens.

However, technique is only one facet of music. What of Phineas' basic musical style? From whence does he come and where is he going?

First, let me warn the reader of what not to do upon first hearing Phineas. Do not be so overpowered by his technique that you neglect to listen to the music he plays. Through all his technical intricacies I hear a wonderful musical mind, a mind that without copying has absorbed the music of the jazz masters. I get a funny feeling when I hear Phineas. I concentrate on his fan­tastically-"Bird'-influenced ideas and then I can't help but get the feeling that at any moment he is going to swing right into a Waller-James P. Johnson stride piano effect. He never quite does and I sometimes wish he would.

Phineas says his first jazz idols were Bird, Dizzy and Bud Powell. Later on, after he had begun to develop his own style, he heard Tatum. There is no doubt of the influence that these men left on Phineas. There is also evidence that he has listened to Erroll Garner.

However, there is never a question that Phineas has a unique approach to music. (In this album I believe Daahoud comes the closest to defining the Phineas Newborn style).


The only real criticism I have of his playing can be traced to his immaturity, both musically and in years. He tends to want to play everything in the same tempo. To be more explicit, he feels so relaxed at up-tempos that even in ballads he resorts to double-timing in order to utilize his technique. Also, he has a few figures of which he is fond. These appear a little too often in his playing. As soon as Phineas gets over the idea that he must create an impression the first time around the nightclub circuit, I am sure these minor faults will disappear.

Biographically, Phineas' history is not startling. The son of Phineas Newborn, Sr., a fine drummer and band leader in Memphis, he and his brother, Calvin, one year his junior, had an early musical beginning (Calvin plays guitar in the Phineas Newborn Quartet and is heard on some of the sides in this album). Phineas started the study of piano at the age of six with the pianist in his fathers band. He continued right through high (trumpet, tuba, baritone horn, French horn). Later on, he learned the vibes, and in college and the Army he acquired the baritone, tenor and alto saxophones. Those who have heard him say he is nearly as fantastic on these various instruments as he is on the piano. For­tunately, Phineas has concentrated on piano and does not try to impress us with his versatility.

His formal education, in addition to graduating from the Memphis School System, consists of two years as a music major at Tenn. A & I. Later on he spent a year at Lemoyne College in Memphis, before he was drafted into the Army in August 1953. He was discharged in June 1955, and played with his father's band until last month when he made the break after the Willard Alex­ander agency convinced him he should come North and let the world hear his talent. I am sure that Count Basie, who is Phineas' greatest booster, had much influence on his decision.

As in any record, the music in this album speaks for itself. My personal favorites are the Clifford Brown Daahoud, and a very Tatumesque Newport Blues. I also like his treatment of the Ellington standard I’m Beginning to See the Light. He is accompanied very ably by two jazz greats, Oscar Pettiford on bass and Kenny Clarke on drums, in addition to his brother Calvin on guitar.                                             

- GEORGE WEIN”



Leonard Feather, who, as noted, became an early and frequent champion of Phineas’ music, offered these cogent observations about him and comparisons with other Jazz pianists in the liner notes to Phineas’ 1969 Contemporary album, Please Send Me Someone to Love [S-7622; OJCCD 947-2:

“For a more than a half century, there was a series of evolutions in keyboard jazz, which originated in ragtime, then was marked by the successive advent of stride, with its volleying left hand; horn-style piano, characterized mainly by a fusillade of octaves or long runs of single notes in the right hand; bebop piano, with its central concern for harmonic experiments and relatively limited left-hand punctua­tions; and a 1950s trend marked by a concern for rich, full chords and a more expansive left-hand concept.

The only pianist who succeeded in absorbing many character­istics of each of these phases, in fact the first authentic and com­plete virtuoso of jazz piano, was Art Tatum. His death in 1956 seemed to close the book; there was no room for development, no area to examine that he had not already explored.

Time has shown that there were indeed other directions. The atonal improvisations of Cecil Taylor were acclaimed by many observers as taking jazz forward into a freer, more abstract music. Bill Evans launched what I once characterized, in an essay on jazz piano for Show magazine (July 1963), as the Serenity School, cre­ating new harmonic avenues, new voicings, swinging without hammering, asserting tersely yet subtly, rarely rising above a mezzo-forte. McCoy Tyner, armed with exceptional technical facili­ty, moved along still another route with extensive use of modes as a departure from the traditional chordal basis.

All these changes during the late 1950s and throughout the '60s did nothing to demolish the theory that Art Tatum represent­ed the ultimate. Coincidentally, it was during the year of Tatum's death that Phineas Newborn, Jr. first came to New York and emerged from Memphis obscurity (he was born Dec. 14,1931 in WhitevilleTenn.) to establish himself as the new pianistic pianist, in the Tatum tradition.

In the abovementioned Show article, I wrote: "Most astonish­ing of the dexterous modernists is Phineas Newborn, Jr. As small, timid, and frail as Peterson is big and burly, Newborn belies his meek manner with a relentlessly aggressive style. His technique can handle any mechanical problem and he has, moreover, a quick, sensitive response to the interaction of melody and harmo­ny." Commenting that most critics tended to be skeptical of tech­nical perfection, I wrote of Newborn's A World of Piano! album (Contemporary S-7600) that it was "the most stunning piano set since Tatum's salad days in the 1930s."



A year later, in 1964, I went out on a rare limb to declare unequivocally, in Down Beat, "Newborn is the greatest living jazz pianist."

Five years later, while perfectly content to let that categorical statement remain on the record, I reflected on what esthetic, what ratiocination led me to this conclusion. Under the spell of a set by Peterson in top form I might have made a similar remark. In either case, my reaction would have been primarily emotional, but the emotions in evaluating a work of art are often guided, per­haps subliminally, by a consciousness of the craftsmanship required for its creation.

Despite the chattering of the anti-intellectuals, I cannot see how any possible advantage can be found in technical limitation. Clearly technique can be abused, or used without imagination; 1 can think of a dozen popular pianists, some of them well-known via network television, who have made this point painfully clear. But a man like Newborn, who reached his present command of the instrument by practicing perhaps six or seven hours a day, automatically has an advantage over the simplistic artist, who resorts to simple figures and clichés only because that is as far as his fingers and mind will take him.

Phineas demonstrates all the virtues and none of the handi­caps (if there are any) inherent in knowing how to use the piano. Taking him on his own terms, he's an involved, committed artist, for whom the instrument is virtually an extension of the man. This would not be possible if he were in any way hamstrung by not being able to execute whatever idea may cross his mind.

I won't deny that when he uses a personal device, such as the parallel lines in unison an octave apart, I am impressed by the ease with which he dashes off such passages; but even more meaningful to me is the originality and artistry of the melodic structure he has been able to build.

When Phineas plays the blues, as he does on at least three tracks in this album, it is not down-home, backwoods blues, but it's just as deep a shade of blue, and comes just as straight from the heart, as if he were a primitive trying to make something meaningful out of three chord changes and a couple of riffs. I hear in him all that is emotional, as well as all that is cerebral and virtuosic, about jazz piano in one of its most sophisticated forms.”

If you spend some time listening to the music of Phineas Newborn, Jr., I think that it would be safe to say that you, too will “… hear in him all that is emotional, as well as all that is cerebral and virtuosic, about jazz piano in one of its most sophisticated forms.”

After all, if Leonard Feather is indeed correct, there have only been two other Jazz pianists comparable to Phineas in the history of Jazz: - Bud Powell and Art Tatum.

Not bad company, eh?